Abstract
Why does a peacock have a beautiful train, while a peahen is sober without such flamboyance? Darwin proposed the theory of sexual selection to explain the differences between the sexes of the same species. Recently the study of sexual selection has been one of the most flourishing areas in evolutionary biology. However, the theory met with great resistance from biologists since the publication of the idea and the history of the theory included a lot of misunderstanding and confusion. There are several reasons for this. First, classical Darwinism failed to recognize social competition as an important selective force. Second, the good-for-the-species argument, which persisted in the days after Darwin, made the sexual selection argument more difficult to understand. Compared to the discussions on animals, Darwin’s argument on human sex differences is not satisfactory. The reason probably lies in the debate over human racial differences which prevailed in the 19th century.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M 1994Sexual selection (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
Argylle The Duke 1868The rein of law (London: Strahan)
Burkhardt F, Porter D M, Browne J and Richmond M (eds) 1993The correspondence of Charles Darwin vol. 8 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Cronin H 1991The ant and the peacock: Altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Desmond A and Moore J 1991Darwin (London: Michael Joseph)
Geddes Pand Thomson J A 1889The evolution of sex (London: Walter Scott)
Ghiselin M T 1984The triumph of the Darwinian method (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)
Huxley J S 1938a Darwin’s theory of sexual selection and the data subsumed by it, in the light of recent research;Am. Nat. 72 416–433
Huxley J S 1938b The present standing of the theory of sexual selection; inEvolution (ed.) G De Beer (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Huxley J S 1942Evolution: The modern synthesis (London: G Allen and Unwin)
Kottler M J 1980 Darwin, Wallace and the origin of sexual dimorphism;Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 124 203–226
Kottler M J 1985 Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace: Two decades of debate over natural selection; inDarwinian heritage (ed.) D Kohn (Princeton: Princeton University Press) pp 367–432
Mivart St G 1871 Review of Darwin’s “Descent of Man”;Q. Rev. 131 47–90
Morgan T H 1916A critique of the theory of evolution: The Louis Clark Vanuxem foundation lectures, 1915–1916 (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
Morgan T H 1919The genetic and operative evidence related to secondary sexual characters (Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington)
Prichard J C 1855Natural history of man, 4th edition, vol. 1, 2 (London: H Bailliere)
Wallace A R 1889Darwinism (London: Macmillan)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. The sight of the peacock’s tail makes me sick: The early arguments on sexual selection. J. Biosci. 25, 11–18 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985176
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985176