Skip to main content
Log in

The sight of the peacock’s tail makes me sick: The early arguments on sexual selection

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why does a peacock have a beautiful train, while a peahen is sober without such flamboyance? Darwin proposed the theory of sexual selection to explain the differences between the sexes of the same species. Recently the study of sexual selection has been one of the most flourishing areas in evolutionary biology. However, the theory met with great resistance from biologists since the publication of the idea and the history of the theory included a lot of misunderstanding and confusion. There are several reasons for this. First, classical Darwinism failed to recognize social competition as an important selective force. Second, the good-for-the-species argument, which persisted in the days after Darwin, made the sexual selection argument more difficult to understand. Compared to the discussions on animals, Darwin’s argument on human sex differences is not satisfactory. The reason probably lies in the debate over human racial differences which prevailed in the 19th century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M 1994Sexual selection (Princeton: Princeton University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Argylle The Duke 1868The rein of law (London: Strahan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt F, Porter D M, Browne J and Richmond M (eds) 1993The correspondence of Charles Darwin vol. 8 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin H 1991The ant and the peacock: Altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond A and Moore J 1991Darwin (London: Michael Joseph)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes Pand Thomson J A 1889The evolution of sex (London: Walter Scott)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M T 1984The triumph of the Darwinian method (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J S 1938a Darwin’s theory of sexual selection and the data subsumed by it, in the light of recent research;Am. Nat. 72 416–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J S 1938b The present standing of the theory of sexual selection; inEvolution (ed.) G De Beer (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J S 1942Evolution: The modern synthesis (London: G Allen and Unwin)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottler M J 1980 Darwin, Wallace and the origin of sexual dimorphism;Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 124 203–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kottler M J 1985 Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace: Two decades of debate over natural selection; inDarwinian heritage (ed.) D Kohn (Princeton: Princeton University Press) pp 367–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Mivart St G 1871 Review of Darwin’s “Descent of Man”;Q. Rev. 131 47–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan T H 1916A critique of the theory of evolution: The Louis Clark Vanuxem foundation lectures, 1915–1916 (Princeton: Princeton University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan T H 1919The genetic and operative evidence related to secondary sexual characters (Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard J C 1855Natural history of man, 4th edition, vol. 1, 2 (London: H Bailliere)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace A R 1889Darwinism (London: Macmillan)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. The sight of the peacock’s tail makes me sick: The early arguments on sexual selection. J. Biosci. 25, 11–18 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985176

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985176

Keywords

Navigation