Journal of Genetics

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 81–91 | Cite as

A cross-over shunt model for alternate potentiation of yeast mating-type alleles

  • Spencer W. Brown


Mating Type Regulatory Scheme Pericentric Inversion Regulatory Zone Opposite Mating Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AHMAD, M. (1965). Homogenic incompatibility: Incompatibility in yeasts. pp. 13–23 inIncompatibility in Fungi, K. Esser and J. R. Roper, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  2. HARASHIMA, S., NOGI, Y. and OSHIMA, Y. (1974). The genetic system controlling homothallism inSaccharomyces yeasts. Genetics 77: 639–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. HAWTHORNE, D.C. (1963). A deletion in yeast and its bearing on the structure of the mating type locus. Genetics 48: 1727–1729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. HOLLIDAY, R. and PUGH, J.E. (1975). DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science 187: 226–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. HOPPER, A.K. and HALL, B.D. (1975). Mutation of a heterothallic strain to homothallism. Genetics 80: 77–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. KETNER, G. and CAMPBELL, A. (1975). Operator and promoter mutations affecting divergent transcription in thebio gene cluster ofEscherichia coli. Jour. Molec. Biol. 96: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McCLINTOCK, B. (1953). Mutation in maize. Carnegie Inst. Washington Year Book No. 52 (1952–1953): 227–237. - (1961). Some parallels in gene control systems in maize and bacteria. Amer. Naturalist 95: 265–277.Google Scholar
  8. MacKAY, V. and MANNEY, T.R. (1974). Mutations affecting sexual conjugation and related processes inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Genetic analysis of nonmating mutants. Genetics 76: 273–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. NAUMOV, G.I. and TOLSTORUKOV, I.I. (1973). Comparative genetics of yeast. X. Reidentification of mutators of mating types inSaccharomyces. Genetika 9: 82–91.Google Scholar
  10. OSHIMA, Y. and TAKANO, I. (1971). Mating types inSaccharomyces: their convertibility and homothallism. Genetics 67: 327–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. SMITHIES, O. (1963). Gamma-globulin variability: a genetic hypothesis. Nature 199: 1231–1236. - (1967). Antibody variability. Science 157: 267–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. STERN, C. (1973).Principals of Human Genetics. 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. TAKANO, I., KUSUMI, T. and OSHIMA, Y. (1973). Anα mating-type allele insensitive to the mutagenic action of the homothallic gene system inSaccharomyces diastaticus. Molec. gen. Genet. 126: 19–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. TAKANO, I. and OSHIMA, Y. (1967). An allele specific and a complementary determinant controlling homothallism inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 57: 875–885. - (1970). Mutational nature of an allelespecific conversion of the mating type by the homothallic geneHOα inSaccharomyces. Genetics 65: 421–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. WILCOX, G., BOULTER, J. and LEE, N. (1974). Direction of transcription of the regulatory genearaC inEscherichia coli B/r. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71: 3635–3639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. WINGE, Ö. and ROBERTS, C. (1949). A gene for diploidization in yeast. Compt. Rend. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg, Sér. Physiol. 24: 341–346.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spencer W. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Theoretical StudiesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations