Journal of Genetics

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 1–31 | Cite as

Familial selection and the evolution of social behavior

  • Francesco M. Scudo
  • Michael T. Ghiselin


This paper considers a few frequency models, in the deterministic, nonoverlapping generations case, for traits affecting familial behavior. It is assumed that a Mendelian mutant decreases the drive of offspring of either or both sexes to seek reproduction, so that they will be of more help in raising their sibs. The diploid mode of inheritance has been considered in the case of sex limited expression and equal selective effect in both sexes. In the haplodiploid case only expression limited to either sex is worked out. A selectionist interpretation in terms of different modes of inheritance had been proposed mainly by Hamilton, at a semi-quantitative level, to explain the higher incidence of social behavior in hymenopterans.

There is only some limited qualitative agreement between Hamilton’s tentative results and the more orthodox treatment presented in this paper. Thus an “inclusive fitness” of genes can be defined, but only in a very special approximate case. However exactly the opposite conclusions as Hamilton’s are reached by interpreting our models both from Hamilton’s and from other, more plausible, points of view.

Alternative explanations based on biological preconditions rather than the mode of inheritance are proposed for hymenopteran societies. On the other hand the reasoning in this paper might help to explain systematic differences in social behavior between mammals and birds, especially if they were determined by sex linked characters (points on which no information is available).


Haldane Inclusive Fitness Reciprocal Altruism Individual Competition Warm Blooded Vertebrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. 1974. The Role of Plasticity in Biological and Cultural Evolution.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 231: 43–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crozier, R.H. 1970. Coefficients of Relationship and the Identity by Descent of Genes in Hymenoptera.Am, Nat., 104: 216–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Darlington, P. J. 1971. Interconnected Patterns of Biogeography and Evolution,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68: 1254–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin, C. 1859 to 1882.The Origin of Species. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C. 1871 and 1874.The Descent of Man and Selection in. Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  6. Eshel, I. 1972. On the Neighborhood Effect and the Evolution of Altruistic Genes.J. Theor. Pop. Biol., 3: 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghiselin, M. T. 1974.The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley, U.C. Press.Google Scholar
  8. Haldane, J.B.S. 1924. The Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, I.Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc., 23: 19–41.Google Scholar
  9. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932.The Causes of Evolution. 1966 reprint, Cornell Un. Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior.J. Theor. Biol., 7: I, 1–16 and II, 17–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton, W.D. 1971. Selection of Selfish and Altruistic Behavior in Some Extreme Models, inMan and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior, Smithsonian Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Jayakar, S.D. and Spurway, H. 1966. Sex Ratios in some Mason Wasps.Nature, 212: 306–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jayakar, S.D. and Spurway, H. 1967. Reuse of Cells and BrotherSister Mating in Indian Species ofStenodynerus miniatus.J. Bombay. Nat. Hist. Soc., 63: 378.Google Scholar
  14. Kostitzin, V.A. 1934.Symbiose, Parasitisme at Evolution. Herman, Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Kostitzin, V.A. 1937.Biologie Mathematique. Armand Colin, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. Kroptkin, P. 1904.Mutal Aid, a Factor of Evolution. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  17. Lamarck, J. B. 1809.Phylosophie Zoologique. 1968 reprint, Union Generale, Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Levin, B. and Kilmer, W.I. (MS) Interdemic Slection and the Evolution of Altruism: a Computer Simulation Study. Submitted toEvolution.Google Scholar
  19. Lin, N. and Michener, C. D. 1972. Evolution of Sociality in Insects.Quart. Rev. Biol., 47: 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lorenz, K. 1965.The Evolution and Modification of Behavior. Chicago Un. Press.Google Scholar
  21. Maynard-Smith, J. 1964. Group Selection and Kin Selection.Nature, 201: 1145–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mainardi, D. 1974.L’Animale Culturale. Rizzoli, Milano.Google Scholar
  23. Michener, C. D. and Brothers, D. J. 1974. Were Workers of Eusocial Hymenoptera Initially Altruistic or Oppressed?Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71: 671–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montel, G. 1957.Lecons sûr les recurrences. Gautier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
  25. Orlove, M. J. 1974. A Model of Kin Selection not Invoking Coefficients of Relationship.J. Theor. Biol., 48: 557–577.Google Scholar
  26. Orlove, M. J. (MS) Some Further Insights into Kin Selection. In Press inJ. Theor. Biol.Google Scholar
  27. Ponce de Leon, A. and Scudo, F. M. (MS) Observational Learning of Alpaca from Sheep.Google Scholar
  28. Scudo, F. M. 1967a. L’Accoppiamento Assortative basato sul Fenotipo di Parenti.Ist. Lomb. (Rend. Sci.) B.101: 435–455.Google Scholar
  29. Scudo, F. M. 1967b. Selection on both Haplo-and Diplophase.Genetics, 56: 693–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scudo, F. M. 1968. On Mixtures of Inbreeding Systems.Heredity, 23: 142–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scudo, F.M. 1971. Vito Volterra and Theoretical Ecology.J. Theor. Biol., 2: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scudo, F.M. 1975. Genetics and Behavior. History of the Theories on and Variation. In press inProc. XX Meeting It. Genet. Soc.Google Scholar
  33. Scudo, F.M. (MS) Vadim A. Kostitzin and Evolutionary Models.Google Scholar
  34. Trivers, R. M. 1971. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.Quart. Rev. Biol., 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waddington, C. H. 1974, A Catastrophe Theory of Evolution.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 231: 32–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wallace, A. R. 1889.Darwinism.1905 edition, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  37. Wickler, W. 1972,The Sexual Code. Doubleday, London.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, E.O. 1971.Insect Societies. Belknap, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Wright, S. 1945. A Critical Review.Ecology, 26: 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wright, S. 1960, Physiological Genetics, Ecology and Populations and Natural Selection. InEvolution after Darwin, Vol. 1, Chicago Un. Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco M. Scudo
    • 1
  • Michael T. Ghiselin
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst
  2. 2.Dept. of Zoology and Bodega Marine LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations