Science and thinking: The write connection
- 70 Downloads
The effective use of writing in science instruction may open the way for students to grow in their ability to exercise higher order thinking skills (Bland & Koppel, 1988). Scinto (1986) makes a compelling case for writing as a means of stimulating thinking when he states:
The production of written text demands more elaborate strategies of preplanning. Written language demands the conscious organization of ensembles of propositions to achieve its end. The need to manipulate linguistic means in such a conscious and deliberate fashion entails a level of linguistic self-reflection not called forth in oral discourse (p. 101).
Science educators may find that the writing process is one technique to help them move away from the teacher-centered, textbook-driven science classroom of today, and move toward the realization of science education which will ensure that students are able to function as scientifically literate citizens in our contemporary society.
KeywordsScience Teacher Science Achievement Thinking Skill Educational Leadership Writing Process
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Applebee, A. N. (1981).Writing in the secondary school (Research Report No. 21). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989).Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Beyer, B. K. (1984). Improving thinking skills-defining the problem.Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 486–490.Google Scholar
- Beyer, B. K. (1984). Improving thinking skills — practical approaches.Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 556–560.Google Scholar
- Bland, C. & Koppel, I. (1988). Writing as a thinking tool.Educational Leadership, 45(7), 58–60.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
- Crow, L. W., & Haws, S. G. (1985, April).The effects of teaching logical reasoning upon students’ critical thinking and science achievement. Paper presented at the 58th annual meeting for the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. French Lick Springs, IN.Google Scholar
- Holdzkom, D. & Lutz, P. (Eds.). (1984).Research within reach: science education. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Hull. G., & Bartholomae, D. (1986). Teaching writing as learning and process.Educational Leadership, 45(7), 44–53.Google Scholar
- International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1988).Science achievement in seventeen countries. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughs, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1988).Dimensions of thinking: a frame work for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development..Google Scholar
- Mullis, I. V., & Jenkins, L. B. (1988).The science report card: Elements of risk and recovery. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Olson, C. B. (1984) Fostering critical thinking skills through writing.Educational Leadership, 41(11), 28–39.Google Scholar
- Osborn, J. H., Jones, B. F., & Stein, M. (1985). The case for improving textbooks.Educational Leadership, 42(7), 9–16.Google Scholar
- Pradl, G. M., & Mayher, J. S. (1985). Reinvigorating learning through writing.Educational Leadership, 44(5), 4–6.Google Scholar
- Scinto, L. F. M. (1986).Written language and psychological development. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar