Journal of Genetics

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 303–339 | Cite as

The genetic structure ofTulipa

III. Meiosis in polyploids
  • Margaret Upcott


1. The tetraploid tulip species have a lower chiasma frequency at meiosis than the diploids and triploids and fewer changes of partner at pachytene than the latter. Consequently although autotetraploid, they form few quadrivalents and are sexually fertile.

2. The quadrivalents that they form may be classified in two ways:
  1. (a)

    According to the distribution of chiasmata among the four chromosomes. This shows to which of the ten possible types of quadrivalent they belong. These types depend on the number of changes of partner at pachytene and on the symmetry, half-symmetry or asymmetry of the chiasma distributions per chromosome.

  2. (b)

    According to the co-orientation of the centromeres at the first metaphase of meiosis, whether convergent, linear or indifferent. The type of co-orientation depends upon the distances apart of the centromeres in the multivalent at the time metaphase begins. Co-orientation fails altogether when the centromeres are further apart than they can be in bivalents. These principles agree with the repulsion theory of orientation.


3. The inter- and intranuclear mean squares show no significant correlation of chiasma frequency in the diploids. A slightly positive correlation in the tetraploids and variable correlation in the triploids is presumably to be attributed to the number of changes of partner their chromosomes undergo and to variable external conditions.


Side View Extra Chromosome Chiasma Frequency Chromosome Race Pachytene Nucleus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Crane, M. B. &Thomas, P. T. (1939). “Genetical studies in pears. I. The origin and behaviour of a new giant form.”J. Genet.37, 287–299.Google Scholar
  2. Darlington, C. D. (1929). “Meiosis in polyploids. II.”J. Genet.21, 17–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —— (1930). “Studies inPrunus. III.”J. Genet. 22, 65–93.Google Scholar
  4. —— (1931). “Meiosis in diploid and tetraploidPrimula sinensis.”J. Genet. 24, 65–96.Google Scholar
  5. —— (1935). “Internal mechanics of the chromosomes. I–III.”Proc. roy. Soc. B,118, 33–96.Google Scholar
  6. —— (1936a). “The analysis of chromosome movements. I.Podophyllum versipelle.”Cytologia, Tokyo,7, 242–7.Google Scholar
  7. —— (1936b). “The external mechanics of the chromosomes. I–IV.”Proc. roy. Soc. B,121, 264–319.Google Scholar
  8. —— (1936c). “Crossing-over and its mechanical relationships inChorthippus andStauroderus.”J. Genet. 33, 465–500.Google Scholar
  9. —— (1937).Recent Advances in Cytology, 2nd ed. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
  10. Darlington, C. D. &Gairdner, A. E. (1937). “The variation system inCampanula persicifolia.”J. Genet.35, 97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darlington, C. D. &Janaki-Ammal, E. K. (1932). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata. I. Diploid and tetraploidTulipa.”Bot. Gaz.93, 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darlington, C. D. &Mather, K. (1932). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata. III. TriploidTulipa.”Cytologia, Tokyo,4, 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. Haldane, J. B. S. (1931). “The cytological basis of genetical interference.”Cytologia, Tokyo,3, 54–65.Google Scholar
  14. Klingstedt, H. (1937). “On some tetraploid spermatocytes inChrysochraon dispar (Orth.).”Mem. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn.12, 194–209.Google Scholar
  15. Lawrence, W. J. C. (1931). “The genetics and cytology ofDahlia variabilis.”J. Genet.24, 257–306.Google Scholar
  16. Levan, A. (1933). “Cytological studies inAllium. III.”Hereditas, Lund,18, 101–14.Google Scholar
  17. —— (1936). “Cytological studies inAllium. III.”Hereditas, Lund,18, 101–14.Google Scholar
  18. —— (1936). “Zytologische Studien enAllium Schoenoprasum.”Hereditas, Lund,22, 1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —— (1937). “Cytological studies in theAllium paniculatum group.”Hereditas, Lund,23, 317–70.Google Scholar
  20. McClintock, B. (1933). “The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis inZea Mays.”Z. Zellforsch.19, 191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mather, K. (1936). “Competition between bivalents during chiasma formation.”Proc. roy. Soc. B,120, 208–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. -- (1939). “Competition for chiasmata in diploid and trisomic maize.”Chromosoma,1 (in the Press).Google Scholar
  23. Moffett, A. A. (1932). “Studies in the formation of multinuclear giant pollen grains inKniphofia.”J. Genet.25, 315–37.Google Scholar
  24. —— (1936). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata. XIII. Diploid and tetraploidCulex pipiens.”Cytologia, Tokyo,7, 184–97.Google Scholar
  25. Müntzing, A. (1936). “The evolutionary significance of autopolyploidy.”Hereditas, Lund,21, 263–378.Google Scholar
  26. Newton, W. C. F. (1927). “Chromosome studies inTulipa and some related genera.”J. linn. Soc. (Bot.),47, 339–54.Google Scholar
  27. Newton, W. C. F. &Darlington, C. D. (1929). “Meiosis in polyploids. I.”J. Genet.21, 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Ribbands, C. R. (1937). “The consequences of structural hybridity at meiosis inLilium × testaceum.”J. Genet.35, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson, M. M. (1936). “Structural hybridity inLilium Martagon album × L. Hansonii.”J. Genet.32, 411–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimotomai, N. (1933). “Zur Karyogenetik der Gattung Chrysanthemum.”J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. B,2, 1–100.Google Scholar
  31. Upcott, M. (1935). “The cytology of triploid and tetraploidLycopersicum esculentum.”J. Genet.31, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. —— (1937a). “The genetic structure ofTulipa. II. Structural hybridity.”J. Genet. 34, 339–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. —— (1937b). “The external mechanics of the chromosomes. VI. The behaviour of the centromere at meiosis.”Proc. roy. Soc. B,124, 336–61.Google Scholar
  34. Upcott, M. &La Cour, L. (1936). “The genetic structure ofTulipa. I. A chromosome survey.”J. Genet.33, 237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1939

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Upcott
    • 1
  1. 1.John Innes Horticultural InstitutionMerton, London

Personalised recommendations