Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 275–303 | Cite as

Non-disjunction inOenothera and the genesis of trisomics

  • C. E. Ford
Article

Keywords

Full Mutant Pairing Segment Gentian Violet Differential Segment Ring Pair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belling, J. (1930).The Use of the Microscope. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Blakeslee, A. F. (1930). “Extra chromosomes as a source of variations in the Jimson weed.”Smithsonian Report for 1930, pp. 431–50.Google Scholar
  3. Capinpin, J. M. (1933). “Studies on the genetics and cytology of triploid Oenotheras.”Cytologia,4, 355–426.Google Scholar
  4. Catcheside, D. G. (1933). “Chromosome configurations in trisomic Oenotheras.”Genetica,15, 178–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —— (1935). “X-ray treatment ofOenothera chromosomes.” Ibid.17, 314–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —— (1936). “Origin, anture and breeding behaviour ofOenothera Lamarckiana trisomics.”J. Genet. 33, 1–23.Google Scholar
  7. Darlington, C. D. (1931). “The cytological theory of inheritance inOenothera.” Ibid.24, 405–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, B. M. (1910). “Cytological studies onOenothera. II. The reduction, divisions ofO. biennis.”Ann. Bot.24, 631–51.Google Scholar
  9. —— (1911). “Cytological studies onOenothera. III. A comparison of the reduction, divisions ofO. Lamarckiana andO. gigas.” Ibid.25, 941–74.Google Scholar
  10. Dulfer, H. (1926). “Die Erblichkeitserscheinungen derOenothera Lamarckiana semigigas.” Diss. Amsterdam; J. H. de Bussy, pp. 71, figs. 8.Google Scholar
  11. Gates, R. R. (1908). “A study of reduction inOenothera rubrinervis.”Bot. Gaz.44, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —— (1923). “The trisomic mutations ofOenothera.”Ann. Bot. 37, 543, 563.Google Scholar
  13. -- (1936). “Genetical and Taxonomic investigations in the genusOenothera.”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Series B,226.Google Scholar
  14. Gates, R. R. &Catcheside, D. G. (1932). “Gamolysis of various new Oenotheras.”J. Genet.26, 143–78.Google Scholar
  15. Gates, R. R. &Nandi, H. K. (1935). “The cytology of trisomic mutations in a wild species ofOenothera.”Philos. Trans. B,225, 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Håkansson, A. (1930). “Zur Zytologie Trisomischer Mutanten ausOenothera Lamarckiana.”Hereditas,14, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoeppener, E. &Renner, O. (1929). “Genetische und Zytologische Oenotherastudien.” IIBot. Abhandl.15, 1–86.Google Scholar
  18. Renner, O. (1917). “Versuche über die Gametische Konstitution der Oenotheren.”Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre,18, 121–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sansome, E. R. (1932). “Segmental interchange inPisum.”Cytologia,3, 200–19.Google Scholar
  20. Sutton, E. (1935). “Half-disjunction in an association of four chromosomes inPisum Sativum.”Ann. Bot.49, 689–98.Google Scholar
  21. Vries, H. de (1916). “New dimorphic mutants of the Oenotheras.”Bot. Gaz.62, 249–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vries, H. de &Boedijn, K. (1923). “On the distribution of mutant characters among the chromosomes ofO. Lamarckiana.”Genetics,8, 233–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1936

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. Ford
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentUniversity of London, King’s CollegeUK

Personalised recommendations