Journal of Genetics

, 31:1 | Cite as

The cytology of triploid and tetraploidLycopersicum esculentum

  • Margaret Upcott


1. The multivalent configurations in the triploid and tetraploidLycopersicum esculentum are of the types which would be expected, if they were determined by a random distribution of chiasmata.

2. They vary in frequency from cell to cell, but remain statistically constant at successive stages, as they would be expected to do on this assumption.

3. The configurations (contrary to the opinion of previous authors, but as is expected on analogy with all other cases of chiasma pairing) are constant between diplotene and metaphase.

4. The metaphase chiasma frequency is highest in the diploid and lowest in the triploid. This is attributed to a similar difference in original chiasma frequency rather than to a greater reduction in number in the triploid during terminalisation.

5. The curve of variance is higher in the polyploids than in the diploids, as has previously been found inTulipa andHyacinthus.

6. The formation of trivalents and univalents in the triploid gives rise to irregularities in the second division, and to the formation of restitution nuclei.

7. The formation of quadrivalents in the tetraploid leads to numerical non-disjunction which is reflected in reduced fertility.


Chiasma Frequency Polar View Triploid Plant Chromatid Segregation Nather 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Afify, A. (1933). “The cytology of the hybrid betweenLycopersicum esculentum andL. racemigerum in relation to its parents.”Genetics,15, 225–39.Google Scholar
  2. Dark, S. O. S. (1931). “Chromosome association in triploidPrimula sinensis.”J. Genet. 25, 91–5.Google Scholar
  3. Darlington, C. D. (1928). “Studies inPrunus. I and II.”19, 213–56.Google Scholar
  4. (1929). “Meiosis in Polyploids. II.”21, 17–53.Google Scholar
  5. (1931). “Meiosis in diploid and tetraploidPrimula sinensis.”24, 65–96.Google Scholar
  6. -- (1932).Recent advances in cytology. London.Google Scholar
  7. Darlington, C. D. andMather, K. (1932). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata, III. TriploidTulipa.”Cytologia,4, 1–15.Google Scholar
  8. Haldane, J. B. S. (1930). “Theoretical genetics of autopolyploids.”J. Genet. 22, 359–72.Google Scholar
  9. Humphrey, L. M. (1934). “Meiotic divisions of haploid, diploid and tetraploid tomatoes.”Cytologia,5, 278–99.Google Scholar
  10. Jørgensen, C. A. (1928). “Experimental formation of heteroploid plants in the genusSolanum.”J. Genet. 19, 133–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kostoff, D. andKendall, J. (1934). “Studies in polyploid plants. III. Cytogenetics of tetraploid tomatoes.”Gartenbauwiss. 9, 20–44.Google Scholar
  12. La Cour, L. (1931). “Improvements in everyday technique in plant cytology.”J. R. Micr. Soc. 51, 119–26.Google Scholar
  13. Lesley, J. W. andLesley, M. M. (1929). “Chromosome fragmentation and mutation in tomato.”Genetics,14, 321–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lesley, M. M. (1926). “Maturation in diploid and triploid tomatoes.”11, 267–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lesley, M. M. andLesley, J. W. (1930). “Mode of origin and chromosome behaviour in pollen mother-cells of a tetraploid seedling tomato.”J. Genet. 22, 419–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mather, K. (1933). “Relation between chiasmata and crossing-over in diploid and triploidDrosophila melanogaster.”27, 243–59.Google Scholar
  17. McClintock, B. (1930). “Cytological demonstration of the location of an interchange between two non-homologous chromosomes inZea Mays.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,16, 791–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsuda, H. (1934). “Cytological studies of the giantPetunia.”Res. Bull. Gifu Coll. Agric. (Japan).Google Scholar
  19. Redfield, H. (1932). “Comparison of triploid and diploid crossing-over for chromosome II ofDrosophila melanogaster.”Genetics,17, 137–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sansome, F. W. (1931). “Graft hybrids and induction of polyploids inSolanum.”Proc. 9th Int. Hort. Cong. pp. 92–99.Google Scholar
  21. (1933). “Chromatid segregation inSolanum Lycopersicum.”J. Genet. 27, 105–32.Google Scholar
  22. Sansome, F. W. andPhilp, J. (1932).Recent advances in Plant Genetics. London.Google Scholar
  23. Stone, L. H. A. andMather, K. (1932). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata, IV. Diploid and triploidHyacinthus.”Cytologia,4, 16–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1935

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Upcott
    • 1
  1. 1.John Innes Horticultural InstitutionMerton, London

Personalised recommendations