Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, 28:113 | Cite as

The cytology of certain intergeneric hybrids betweenFestuca andLolium

  • F. H. Peto
Article

Keywords

Parental Species Pollen Mother Cell Intergeneric Hybrid Chiasma Frequency Good Pollen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alvarez, W. C. (1931). “Testing the reaction of distilled water.”Science,74, 633–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ascherson, P. andGraebner, P. (1902).Synopsis der Mitteleuropäischen Flora,2. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
  3. Avdulow, N. (1931). “Karyo-systematische Untersuchung der Familie Gramineen.”Bull. Appl. Bot. Leningrad, Suppl. 44, 1–428.Google Scholar
  4. Beadle, G. W. (1930). “Genetical and cytological studies of Mendelian asynapsis inZea mays.”Cornell Univ. Expt. Sta. Mem. No. 129.Google Scholar
  5. Bergner, A. D. andBlakeslee, A. F. (1930). “Chromosome configurations in intra- and interspecific hybrids ofDatura.”Proc. V Int. Bot. Cong. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Bleier, H. (1928). “Zytologische Untersuchungen an seltenen Getreide-und Rübenbastarden.”Verh. V Int. Kong. Vererb. Wiss. Berlin,1, 447–52.Google Scholar
  7. Burnham, C. R. (1930). “Genetical and cytological studies of semi-sterility and related phenomena in maize.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 16, 269–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Catcheside, D. G. (1931). “Critical evidence of parasynapsis inOenothera.”Proc. Roy. Soc. B,109, 165–84.Google Scholar
  9. Church, G. L. (1929). “Meiotic phenomena in certain Gramineae. I.”Bot. Gaz. 87, 608–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darlington, C. D. (1929a). “Meiosis in polyploids. II. Aneuploid hyacinths.”Journ. Gen. 21, 17–56.Google Scholar
  11. —— (1929b). “Chromosome behaviour and structural hybridity in theTradescantiae.” Ibid.21, 207–86.Google Scholar
  12. —— (1930a). “Studies inPrunus. III.” Ibid.22, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —— (1930b). “Chromosome studies inFritillaria, III. Chiasma formation and chromosome pairing inF. imperialis.”Cytologia,2, 37–55.Google Scholar
  14. —— (1931a). “The analysis of chromosome pairing inTriticum hybrids.” Ibid.3, 21–5.Google Scholar
  15. —— (1931b). “The cytological theory of inheritance inOenothera.”Journ. Gen. 24, 405–74.Google Scholar
  16. Emerson, R. A. (1929). “Genetic notes on hybrids of perennial teosinte and maize.”Amer. Nat. 63, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans, G. (1926). “Chromosome complements in grasses.”Nature,118, 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faworski, N. (1927). “Vergleichende karyologische Untersuchungen einiger Arten vonLolium.”Planta,3, 282–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fukushima, E. (1931). “Formation of diploid and tetraploid gametes inBrassica.”Jap. Journ. Bot. 5, 273–83.Google Scholar
  20. Gaines, E. F. andAase, H. C. (1926). “A haploid wheat plant.”Amer. Journ. Bot. 13, 373–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gairdner, A. E. andDarlington, C. D. (1931). “Ring formation in diploid and polyploidCampanula persicifolia.”Genetica,13, 113–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gates, R. R. andRees, E. M. (1921). “A cytological study of pollen development inLactuca.”Ann. Bot. 35, 365–98.Google Scholar
  23. Gowen, J. W. (1928). “Mutation, chromosome non-disjunction and the gene.”Science,68, 211–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollingshead, L. (1930). “A lethal factor inCrepis effective only in an interspecific hybrid.”Genetica,15, 114–40.Google Scholar
  25. Holmberg, O. R. (1930). “Ein unzweifelhafter Bastard zwischenFestuca pratensis (Huds.) undLolium multiflorum (Lam.) nachgewiesen.”Bot. Notiser, No. 2, p. 91, Lund.Google Scholar
  26. Huskins, C. L. (1931). “A cytological study of Vilmorin’s unfixable dwarf wheat.”Journ. Gen. 25, 113–124.Google Scholar
  27. Janssens, F. A. (1924). “La chiasmatypie dans les insectes.”Cellule,34, 135–359.Google Scholar
  28. Jenkin, T. J. (1924). “The artificial hybridisation in grasses.”Welsh Plant Breeding Station Bull. H 2, 1–18.Google Scholar
  29. -- (1925). “The artificial production of intergeneric hybrids in grasses.”Report British Ass. Adv. Sci. Southampton, pp. 361–2.Google Scholar
  30. -- (1930). “The species concept (discussion).”Proc. V Int. Bot. Congress Cambridge, pp. 228–30.Google Scholar
  31. -- (1931a). “The method and technique of selection, breeding and strain building in grasses.”Imp. Bur. Plant. Genet. Herb. Plants, Aberystwyth, No. 3, 5–34.Google Scholar
  32. —— (1931b). “The inter-fertility ofLolium perenne andL. perenne var.multiflorum.”Welsh Plant Breeding Station Bull. H 12, 121–5.Google Scholar
  33. —— (1931c). “Self-fertility in perennial rye-grass.”Welsh Plant Breeding Station Bull. H 12, 100–19.Google Scholar
  34. Kagawa, F. (1928). “Cytological studies inTriticum andAegilops, II.”Jap. Journ. Bot. 4, 1–26.Google Scholar
  35. Karpechenko, G. D. (1927). “Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L. ×Brassica oleracea L.” (English summary.)Bull. Appl. Bot. Leningrad,17, 305–410.Google Scholar
  36. Katterman, G. (1930). “Chromosomenuntersuchungen bei Gramineen.”Planta,12, 19–37,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —— (1931). “Ueber die Bildung polyvalenter Chromosomenverbände bei einigen Gramineen.” Ibid.12, 732–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kihara, H. (1929). “Conjugation of homologous chromosomes in the genus hybridsTriticum × Aegilops and species hybrids ofAegilops.”Cytologia,1, 1–15.Google Scholar
  39. La Cour, L. (1931). “Improvements in everyday technique in plant cytology.”Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. 51, 119–26.Google Scholar
  40. Levitsky, G. A. andKuzmina, N. E. (1927). “Karyological investigations on the systematics and phylogenetics of the genusFestuca.”Bull. Appl. Bot. Leningrad,17, 3–36.Google Scholar
  41. Longley, A. E. (1924). “Chromosomes in maize and maize relatives.”Journ. Agric. Res. 28, 673–82.Google Scholar
  42. Maeda, T. (1930). “On the configurations of gemini in the pollen mother cells ofVicia faba L.”Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto, B 5, 125–37.Google Scholar
  43. Mangelsdorf, P. C. andReeves, R. G. (1931). “Hybridisation of maize, tripsacum andEuchlaena.”Journ. Heredity,22, 329–43.Google Scholar
  44. McAlpine, A. N. (1898). “Production of new types of forage plants—clovers and grasses.”Trans. High. and Agric. Soc. Scotland,10, 135–58.Google Scholar
  45. McClintock, B. (1931). “A cytological demonstration of the location of interchange between the non-homologous chromosomes ofZea mays.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 16, 791–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moffett, A. A. (1932). “Studies on the formation of multi-nuclear giant pollen grains inKniphofia.”Journ. Gen. 25, 315–37.Google Scholar
  47. Navashin, M. (1926). “Variabilität des Zellkerns beiCrepis-Arten in Bezug auf die Artbildung.”Zeit. f. Zellforsch. u. mikro. Anat. 4, 171–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. —— (1931). “A preliminary report on some chromosome alterations by X-rays inCrepis.”Amer. Nat. 65, 243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nemec, B. (1898) “Ueber den Pollen der petaloiden Antheren vonHyacinthus orientalis.”Bull. int. de l’Acad. de Sci. de Bohème (after Schürhoff, 1926).Google Scholar
  50. Nilsson, F. (1930). “Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) ♀ ×F. gigantea (Vill.) ♂. Ein neuer Gattungbastard.”Bot. Notiser, pp. 81–90, Lund.Google Scholar
  51. Radeloff, H. (1930). “Zur Unterscheidung der Spelzfrüchte unserer wichtigstenFestuca undPoa Arten unter besonderer Beruchsichtigung ihrer Mikroskopie.”Mitt. Int. Ver. f. Samenkontrolle, Nos. 11 and 12.Google Scholar
  52. Sansome, E. R. (1932). “Segmental interchange inPisum.”Cytologia,3, 200–19.Google Scholar
  53. Sax, K. (1928). “Chromosome behaviour inTriticum hybrids.”Verh. V Int. Kongr. Wiss. Berlin, pp. 1267–84.Google Scholar
  54. Schürhoff, P. N. (1926).Die Zytologie der Blütenpflanzen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  55. Stählin, A. (1929). “Morphologische und zytologische Untersuchungen an Gramineen.”Wiss. Arch. f. Landw. 1, 330–98.Google Scholar
  56. Stow, I. (1930). “Experimental studies on the formation of the embryo sac-like giant pollen grain in the anther ofHyacinthus orientalis.”Cytologia,1, 417–39.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, W. P. (1926). “Chromosome behaviour in a cross between wheat and rye.”Genetics,11, 317–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1933

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Peto
    • 1
  1. 1.Welsh Plant Breeding StationAberystwyth

Personalised recommendations