, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 263–272 | Cite as

The role of the monoterpene composition inPinus spp. needles, in host selection by the pine processionary caterpillar,Thaumetopoea pityocampa

  • R. Tiberi
  • A. Niccoli
  • M. Curini
  • F. Epifano
  • M. C. Marcotullio
  • O. Rosati
Research Papers


This paper presents preliminary results on attempts to extract and characterize the volatile secondary metabolites contained in needles of differentPinus species and to ascertain the role played by these substances on the behavior ofThaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis et Schiffermüller) females, which show a marked preference, during the oviposition period, for some indigenous and exotic species of host plants existing in mixed formation. Limonene is the most abundant monoterpene extracted fromP. pinea needles, the least favored species of pine processionary caterpillar (PPC) females, although it is present in only very low amounts in otherPinus species. An increase was observed in limonene production byP. pinea at the start of the flight period of the PPC adult, and subsequently at the beginning of the females’ oviposition period. Assays carried out in two pine stands in central Italy showed that limonene, emulsified with water and sprayed on foliage of four different pine species plants,P. sylvestris, P. nigra, P. pinaster andP. radiata, during the PPC oviposition period, provided a satisfactory degree of protection. In fact, the number of egg clusters collected from treated plants was often lower than the number of egg clusters collected from control plants and was comparable to the number of egg clusters laid onP. pinea plants. In particular (R)-(+)-limonene, although not produced in nature by pines, was the most effective deterrent. However, the effect of (S)-(-)-limonene, the enantiomer biosynthesized by pines, was also adequate.

Key Words

Pinus spp. Thaumetopoea pityocampa Terpenes Limonene bioassays 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Altaro, R.I., Pierce, H.D., Jr., Borden, J.H. and Oehlschlager, A.C. (1980) Role of volatile and nonvolatile components of Sitka spruce bark as feeding stimulants forPissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Can. J. Zool. 58:626–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Battisti, A. (1989)Thaumetopoea pityocampa: bio-ecologia e problemi di energetica in ecosistemi di pineta.Atti Convegno Awersità del Bosco e delle Specie Arboree da Legno (Firenze, Italy, 1987), pp. 223–234.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buxton, R.D. (1990) The influence of host tree species on timing of pupation ofThaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. (Lep. Thaumetopoeidae) and its exposure to parasitism byPhryxe caudata Rond (Dipt., Larvaevoridae).J. Appl. Entomol. 109:302–310.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calas, J. (1897) La Processionaire du Pin(Cnethocampa pityocampa). Rev. des Eaux et Forêt, pp. 705–723.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geri, C. (1980) Étude sur les populations de processionnaire du pin (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff., Lepidoptera Thaumetopoeidae).in: Grison, P. [Ed.] Études Écologiques et Ethnologiques dans le Niolu. Ch. VII.Ecol. Mediterr. 6:151–172.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geri, C. (1983) Répartition et évolution des populations de la processionnaire du pin,Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff., (Lep., Thaumetopoeidae) dans les montagnes corses. 1. Régimes d’apparition de l’insecte et dynamique des populations.Acta Oecol. Oecol. Appl. 4:247–268.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halperin, J. (1990) Life history ofThaumetopoea spp. (Lep., Thaumetopoeidae) in Israel.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:1–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huchon, H. and Demolin, G. (1970) La bioécologie de la Processionnaire du pin, dispersion potentielle, dispersion actuelle.Rev. For. Fr. n. sp. La Lutte Biologique en Forêt pp. 220–233.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jactel, H., Kleinhentz, M., Marpeau-Bezard, A., Marion-Poll, F., Menassieu, P. and Burban, C. (1996) Terpene variations in maritime pine constitutive oleoresin related to host tree selection byDioryctria sylverstella Ratz. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 22:1037–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leather, S.R. (1987) Pine monoterpenes stimulate oviposition in the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43:295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leather, S.R., Watt, A.D. and Barbour, D.A. (1985) The effect of host-plant and delayed mating on the fecundity and lifespan of the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): their influence on population dynamics and relevance to pest management.Bull. Entomol. Res. 75:641–651.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Masutti, L. (1964) Ricerche sui parassiti oofagi dellaThaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.Ann. Centro Econ. Mont. Venezie 4:205–271.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masutti, L. and Battisti, A. (1990)Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) in Italy. Bionomics and perspectives of integrated control.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:229–234.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mendel, Z. (1988) Host selection by the pine processionary caterpillarThawnetopoea wilkinsoni.Phytoparaxitica 16:101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mori, K. (1998) Semiochemicals — Synthesis, Stereochemistry and Bioactivity.Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1479–1489.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sadof, C.S. and Grant, G.G. (1997) Monoterpene composition ofPinus sylvestris varieties resistant and susceptible toDioryctria zimmermani.J. Chem. Ecol. 23:1917–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schopf, R. and Avtzis, N. (1987) Die Bedeutung von Nadelinhaltsstoffen für die Disposition von fünf Kiefernarten gegenüberThaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.).J. Appl. Entomol. 103:340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shu, S., Grant, G.G., Langevin, D., Lombardo, D.A. and MacDonald, L. (1997) Oviposition and electroantennogram responses ofDioryctria abietivorella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) elicited by monoterpenes and enantiomers from eastern white pine.J. Chem. Ecol. 23:35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stadler, E. (1974) Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition behavior of the eastern spruce budworm.Entoinol. Exp. Appl. 17:176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tiberi, R. (1983) Sulla distribuzione delle ovature diThaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) in un giovane impianto diPinus pinaster eP. insignis.Redia 66:603–614.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tiberi, R. (1989)Thawnetopoea pityocampa: convenienza delle iniziative di controllo e possibilità di interverti razionali.Atti Convegno Avversità del Bosco e delle Specie Arboree da Legno (Firenze, Italy, 1987), pp. 313–323.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Tiberi
    • 1
  • A. Niccoli
    • 2
  • M. Curini
    • 3
  • F. Epifano
    • 3
  • M. C. Marcotullio
    • 3
  • O. Rosati
    • 3
  1. 1.Istituto di Patologia e Zoologia Forestale e AgrariaUniversità degli StudiFirenzeItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Sperimentale per la Zoologia AgrariaFirenzeItaly
  3. 3.lstituto di Chimica Organica, Facoltà di FarmaciaUniversità degli StudiPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations