Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 388–393 | Cite as

Reaction of spruce cells toward heavy metals and the influence of culture conditions

  • Peter Schröder
  • Claudia Fischer
Research Articles

Abstract

Background

Plant cell cultures may serve as biosensors for the detection of heavy metals and other toxic substances. Standard culture media and protocols are frequently utilised, but in these media no care is usually taken to control the influence of hormones and nutrients on the reaction of the enzymes or metabolites under consideration as parts of the sensor. The present paper investigates the influence of media composition on the reaction of spruce cells towards heavy metals.

Methods

Spruce cell cultures were grown in a standard medium, either i) alone, ii) containing 0.3% sucrose or iii) containing 3% sucrose and the hormones BAP and NAA. The cell cultures were then incubated in medium with fungal elicitor, H2O2, CdSO4 (50 to 500 µM), or, alternatively, with a standard heavy metal mixture containing 80 µM Na2HAsO4, 150 µM CdSO4 and 200 µM PbCl2.

Results

Depending on the nutrient status and hormone availability, large differences in glutathione contents and the GSH/ GSSG ratio were observed. However, the cellular redox state seemed to remain more or less constant. Glutathione S-trans-ferase activity was determined with four substrates, and high induction rates for the conjugation of three substrates were observed when hormones were omitted from the media. 1,2-epoxy-nitrophenoxy-propane conjugation was highest in starving cells in the presence of hormones, showing a transient GST induction, with highest rates occurring after 16 hrs following incubation; the induction effect was lost after 24 hrs.

Conclusion

A medium containing 3 % sucrose and both hormones (BAP and NAA) appears to be most favourable for cellular growth as well as the expression of a basis level of detoxification enzymes and antioxidants. With this combination, early responses towards heavy metals at low concentration can be monitored.

Recommendations and Perspective

Plant cell cultures are valuable tools for the bioindication of heavy metals and toxic xenobiotics. If standard media and protocols are utilised, the influence of hormones and nutrients on the reaction of the biosensor have to be evaluated thoroughly.

Keywords

H2O2 arsenic cadmium culture methods glutathione glutathione S-transferase heavy metals lead oxidative burst plant reactions spruce 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Daniel V (1993): Glutathione S-transferases: gene structure and regulation of expression. Crit Rev Biochem Molecul Biol 28, 173–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dixit V, Pandey V, Shyam R (2001): Differential antioxidative response to cadmium in roots and leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L.). J Exp Bot 52 (358) 1101–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB (1974): Glutathione-S-transferases: the first step in enzymatic mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem 249, 7130–7139Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hayes JD, Pulford DJ (1995): The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: Regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 30 (6) 445–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Herbers K, Meuwly P, Metraux JP, Sonnewald U (1996): Salicylic acid-independent induction of pathogenesis-related protein transcripts by sugars is dependent on leaf developmental stage. FEBS Lett 397 (2–3) 239–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Klinedinst S, Pascuzzi P, Redman J, Desai M, Arias J (2000): A xenobiotic-stress-activated transcription factor and its cognate target genes are preferentially expressed in root tip meristems. Plant Mol Biol 42, 679–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Lamoureux GL, Rusness DG (1989): The role of glutathione and glutathione S-transferases in pesticide metabolism, selectivity and mode of action in plants and insects. In: Dolphin D., Poulson R., Avramovic O. (Eds.), Glutathione: chemical biochemical and medical aspects, Vol IIIB, Ser: Enzyme and Cofactors, pp 153–196. J. Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Messner B, Schröder P (1999): Burst amplifying system in cell suspension cultures of spruce (Picea abies): Modulation of elicitor-induced release of hydrogen peroxide (oxidative burst) by ionophores and salicylic acid. Appl Botany 73, 6–10Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Noctor G, Gomez L, Vanacker H, Foyer CH (2002): Interactions between biosynthesis, compartimentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signalling. J Exp Bot 53 (372) 1283–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Peel AE, Brice A, Marzin D, Erb F (1991): Cellular uptake and biotransformation of arsenic V in transformed human cell lines HeLa S3 and Hep G2. Toxicol. In Vitro 5, 165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Rauser W (1990): Phytochelatins. Annu Rev Biochem 59, 61–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Schmöger MEV, Oven M, Grill E (2000): Detoxification of arsenic by phytochelatins in plants. Plant Physiol 122, 793–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Schroder P, Berlcau C (1993): Characterization of cytosolic glutathione S-transferase in spruce needles: GST isozymes of healthy trees. Bot Acta 106, 301–306Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schröder P, Fischer C, Debus R, Wenzel A (2003): Reaction of detoxification mechanisms in suspension cultured spruce cells (Picea abies L. Karst.) to heavy metals in pure mixture and in soil eluates. ESPR -Environ Sci & Pollut Res 10 (4) 225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Schröder P, Götzberger C (1997): Partial purification and characterization of glutathione S-transferase isozymes from the leaves ofJuniperus communis, Larix decidua andTaxus baccata. Appl Botany 71, 31–37Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Siller-Cepeda JH, Chen THH, Fuchigami LH (1991): High performance liquid chromatography analysis of oxidized glutathione in woody plant tissue. Plant Cell Physiol 32, 1179–1185Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Tully DB, Collins BJ, Overstreet JD, Smith CS, Dinse GE, Mumatz MM, Chapin RE (2000): Effects of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead on gene expression regulated by a battery of 13 different promoters in recombinant HepG2 cells. Tox Appl Pharmacol 168, 79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Wagner U, Mauch F (2000): Glutathione S-transferases: A complex gene family in search of a function http://cost829.dhs.org/reports/sia31.htmGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Willekens H, Chamnongpol S, Davey M, Schraudner M, Langebartels C, van Montagu M, Inze D, VanCamp W (1997): Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO Journal 16, 4806–4816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Zhou J, Goldsbrough PB (1993): AnArabidopsis gene with homology to glutathione S-transferases is regulated by ethylene. Plant Mol Biol 22, 517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rhizosphere BiologyInstitute for Soil Ecology, GSF - National Research Center for Environment and HealthNeuherberg

Personalised recommendations