Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 284–290 | Cite as

Principles and perspectives

  • Klaus Günter Steinhäuser
  • Steffi Richter
  • Petra Greiner
  • Jutta Penning
  • Michael Angrick
Sustainable Chemistry

Abstract

Background, Aim and Scope

With respect to the enormous increase of chemical production in the last decades and the tens of thousands of individual chemicals on the market, the permanent improvement of chemical management is a permanent target to achieve the goals of sustainable consumption and production set by the WSSD in Johannesburg 2002.

Main Features

Several approaches exist to describe sustainability of chemistry. However, commonly agreed criteria are still missing. There is no doubt that products of modern chemistry help to achieve important goals of sustainability and that significant improvements have occurred regarding direct releases from production sites, but several facts demonstrate that chemistry is far from being sustainable. Still too many chemicals exhibit hazardous characteristics and pose a risk to health and environment. Too many resources are needed to produce chemicals and finished products.

Results and Conclusion

Therefore, a strategy for sustainability of chemistry should be developed which comprises the following main elements:
  1. 1.

    Sustainable chemicals: sustainable chemical management includes a regulatory framework which makes no difference between new and existing chemicals, contains efficient information flow through the supply chain which allows users to handle chemicals safely and offers an authorisation procedure and/or an efficient restriction procedure for substances of high concern. This regulatory scheme should promote the development of inherently safe chemicals.

     
  2. 2.

    Sustainable chemical production: Sustainable chemical production needs the development and implementation of emerging alternative techniques like selective catalysis, biotechnology in order to release less CO, and less toxic by-products, to save energy and to achieve higher yields. Information exchange on best available techniques (BAT) and best environmental practices (BEP) may help to promote changes towards more sustainability.

     
  3. 3.

    Sustainable products: An integrated product policy which provides a framework for sustainable products promotes the development of products with a long-term use phase, low resource demand in production and use, low emission of hazardous substances and properties suitable for reuse and recycling. This may be promoted by eco-labelling, chemical leasing concepts and extended information measures to enhance the demand of consumers and various actors in the supply chain for sustainable products.

     

Recommendation and Perspective

Important tools for the promotion of sustainable chemistry are the abolition of barriers for innovation in legislation and within the chemical industry, more transparency for all users of chemical products, a new focus on sustainability in education and research, and a new way of thinking in terms of sustainability.

Keywords

Chemicals chemical production product policy sustainable chemistry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahrens A, von Gleich, Lißner 1, Braun A (2001): Innovation durch erfolgreiches Zusammenwirken von Wirtschaft, Staat und Zivilgesellschaft. UWSF (13) 5, 267–268Google Scholar
  2. Anastas PT, Warner JC (1998): Green Chemistry-Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. BASF (2003): Press release of 11.10.2003, P-03-495 ‘A big step forward in the extension of BASF’s vitamins business’ http://www.corporate.hasf. com/en/sustainability/presse/pm.htm?pmid=1187&:id=V00-R*3KS4r UYbcp**MGoogle Scholar
  4. Beller M (2003): Abfallvermeidung bei der Produktion von Spezialchemi- kalien. In: Abfallvermeidung bei Produktionen für organische Spezial- chemikalien durch den Einsatz weiterentwickelter Katalysatoren. Fachgespräch zum UBA-Forschungsprojekt (FKZ 201 94 313). UBA-Texte 17/03. Berlin, Umweltbundesamt, 43–60Google Scholar
  5. Bio (2002): Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Commitee: Vision for Bioenergy Sc Biobased Products in the United States, October 2002 http://www.hioproducts-bioenergv.gov/pdfs/BioVision03 Web.pdfGoogle Scholar
  6. BMLFUW (2002): Chemicals leasing: Modell für eine nachhaltige Stoffwirtschaft. Schriftenreihe des BMLFUW Band 13/2002, Republik Österreich ISBN 3-902 338-01-06Google Scholar
  7. BUND (2004): Endstation Mensch - Chemikalien im Alltag http://www. bund.net/lah/reddot2/chemiepolitik.htm> und http://www.bund.net/lab/reddot2/chemiepolitik 2681.htmGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunke B (2004): Indicators on chemicals: Sources, impacts and policy performance. Öko-Institut e.V., Freiburg. Presented at the workshop ‘Sus- tainable Chemistry - Integrated Management of Chemicals, Products and Processes’, 27 to 29 January 2004, Dessau http://www.sustainable- chemistry.comGoogle Scholar
  9. CEFIC - European Chemicals Industry Council (2002): Responsible Care is the chemical industry’s own, unique initiative - a voluntary programme that helps it to raise its standards and win greater trust from the public http://www.cefic.org/Files/Publications/RCreport2003.pdfGoogle Scholar
  10. DECHEMA (2003): Chemie mit Mikrowelle, Ultraschall und Laser. Pressemeldung vom 23. August 2003 http://www.chemlin.de/service/news/ 2003082204.htmGoogle Scholar
  11. DuPont (2003): DuPont Receives U.S. EPA’s Presidential Green Chemistry Award for New Innovation - Clothing from Cornfields: Bio-Based Process Uses Renewable Resources Instead of Petrochemicals, Press release of 24.06.2003 http://wwwl.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontplobal/corp/index.jsp.?pagecontent/US/en US/news/releases/2003/nr06 2403a.htmlGoogle Scholar
  12. EASHW (2004): European Agency for Safety and Health at Work http://europe.osha.eu.int/good practice/risks/dangerous substances/faq.stmGoogle Scholar
  13. Eissen M, Metzger J, Schmidt E, Schneidewind U (2002): 10 Jahre nach ‘Rio’ -Konzepte zum Beitrag der Chemie zu einer Nachhaltigen Entwicklung. In: Angew Chem 114, 2000–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EMAS - European Commission: Eco-Management und Audit-Scheme (EMAS) http://europa.eu.inf/comm/environment/emas/index en.htmGoogle Scholar
  15. EU Commission (2002): Study on the Potential for Reducing Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Due to the Use of Decorative Paints and Varnishes for Professional and Non-professional Use - Executive summary http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/pdf/decopaint xsum.pdfGoogle Scholar
  16. EU Commission(a) (2002): Richtlinie 2002/96/EG des Europäischen Parlamentes und Rates vom 27. Januar 2003 über Elektro- und Elektronik-Al tgerä te EuroChlor (2004):The European Chlor-Alkali Industry - Steps towards sustainable development. Progress reportGoogle Scholar
  17. Fluka Chemie GmbH (2004): Green chemistry - Ionic liquids. Vol 1, No. 7Google Scholar
  18. GDCh (2003): Positionspapier der Fachgruppe Umweltchemie und Ökotoxi- kologie der GdCh zu dem Beschluss des Rats für Nachhaltige Entwicklung ‘Perspektiven der Kohle in einer nachhaltigen Energiewirtschaft’ vom 30.09.2003 http://www.umweltchemie-gdch.de/PDF/Positionspapier %20CO2Seq uestrierun g. pdfGoogle Scholar
  19. GDCh (a) (2003): Green Chemistry-Nachhaltigkeit in der Chemie. 1. Auflage, 146 Seiten, gebunden, ISBN 3-527-30815-6. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenpeace International, European Unit (2003): New study reveals: Chemicals are out of control. Press release from 27 June 2003 http://eu. greenpeace.org/downloads/chem/F.uUprhamburg0.30627.docGoogle Scholar
  21. Greiner P (2002): Federal Environmental Agency - Information from the notification of new substancesGoogle Scholar
  22. ICCA - International Council of Chemicals Associations (2002): Responsible Care Status Report http://www.icca-chem.org/section02a.htmlGoogle Scholar
  23. IPPC (1996): Council-Directive 96/61/EG from 24.09.1996 for Integrated Prevention of Pollution Control. Published at 10.10.1996, No. L 257, 26Google Scholar
  24. Jastorff B, Störmann R, Wölcke U (2003): Struktur-Wirkungs-Denken in der Chemie - Ein Weg zu mehr Nachhaltigkeit. Universitätsverlag Asschenbeck und Isensee, Oldenburg [supported by Bundesanstalt für Arbeit und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) in Dortmund]Google Scholar
  25. Klöpffer W (2003): Life-Cycle Based Methods for Sustainable Product Development. Editorial for the LCM Section. Int J LCA 8 (3) 157–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klüppel H-J, Gordeler G, Kurz J (2004): Sustainability - A clean system for washing. Presented at the workshop ‘Sustainable Chemistry - Integrated Management of Chemicals, Products and Processes’, 27 to 29 January 2004, Dessau hrrp://www.sustainable-chemistry.comGoogle Scholar
  27. König B, Braig Ch, Hopf V, Nijakowski A, Bahadir M, Voigt R, Kreisel G, Diehlmann A, Ondruschka B, Nuechter M, Metzger J, Biermann U, Lenoir D, Parlar H, Wattenbach H, Jastorff B, Störmann R, Ranke J (2003): Nachhaltiges Organisches Praktikum (supported by Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, Osnabrück) http:// www.oc-praktikum.deGoogle Scholar
  28. Knitter R (2001): Molekulare keramische Mikroreaktoren für chemische MikroVerfahrenstechnik. Material- und Verfahrenstechnik mikrotechnischer Hochleistungsbauteile. Abschlusspräsentation am 23.10.2001, ForschungszentrumGoogle Scholar
  29. Karlsruhe GmbH, Wissenschaftliche Berichte, FZKA 6662, 101 - 107http://hikwww9.fzk.de/imf3/publikationen/knitter/KMR-Modulare% 20keramische%20Mikroreaktoren-2001 .pdfGoogle Scholar
  30. Kristensen P (2004): Product Panels in Denmark - Examples of market driven reduction in production and use of hazardous chemicals. Presented at the workshop ‘Sustainable Chemistry - Integrated Management of Chemicals, Products and Processes’, 27 to 29 January 2004, Dessau http://www. sustainable-chemistry.comGoogle Scholar
  31. Marscheider-Weidemann F, Hüsing B (2003): Forschungsbericht FKZ 201 94 313, ‘Abfallvermeidung bei Produktionen für organische Spezialche- mikalien durch den Einsatz hochspezifischer Katalysatoren’. Berlin, Umweltbundesamt, Oktober 2003, 25Google Scholar
  32. OECD (2003): Report of the OECD Workshop on Biomass and Agriculture, 10-13 June 2003, Vienna, in press Packroff R (2004): Inherently safe chemical products. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund. Presented at the workshop ‘Sustainable Chemistry - Integrated Management of Chemicals, Products and Processes’, 27 to 29 January 2004, Dessau http://www.sustainahle- chemistry.comGoogle Scholar
  33. REACH (2003): Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, Brussels 29 October 2003 COM (2003) 644Google Scholar
  34. Rio (1992): Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992), Rio de Janeiro; 3-14 June http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev> Seys A (2004): The European Chlor-Alkali Industry on the Move Towards Sustainable Development. Euro Chlor. Presented at the workshop ‘Sustainable Chemistry - Integrated Management of Chemicals, Products and Processes’, 27 to 29 January 2004, Dessau http://www.sustainahle- chemistry.comGoogle Scholar
  35. UBA - Umweltbundesamt (1998): Production-Integrated Rehabilitation of Environment incl. Dioxin-measuring Programme in the Buna-Sow-Leuna Olefinverbund GmbH, Site Schkopau. Report No. 3093Google Scholar
  36. UBA - Umweltbundesamt (2001): German notes on BAT for the production of large volume inorganic chemicals - Titaniumdioxid. Institut für Um-welrtechnik und Management an der Universität Witten/Herdeckc gGmbH http://www.umweltdaten.de/nfp-hat/titand.pdfGoogle Scholar
  37. UBA - Umweltbundesamt (2003): Verminderung diffuser Emissionen in der chemischen und Mineralölindustrie. Fachgespräch zum UBA-Forschungsprojekt (FKZ 200 44 322) am 27.11.2002, UBA-TEXTE 10/2003Google Scholar
  38. UN - United Nations (2002): Report on the World Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  39. UNEP - United Nations Programme for Environment (2001): Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), published by the Interim Secretariat for the Stockholm Convention, Geneva http://www.chem.unep.ch/sc/documents/convtext/convtext en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  40. VCI - Verband der chemischen Industrie (2003): Responsible Care 2003, Daten der chemischen Industrie zu Sicherheit, Gesundheit, Umweltschutz, VCI Juli 2003 http://www.vci.de/default.asp?cmd=shr&erub=739& docnr=90713&nd=l51&ond=5Google Scholar
  41. VCI (2004): Chemie Report Spezial http://www.vci.de/default.asp?cmd= shr&ruh=738&docnr=90708&:nd=(5.4)&cond=4Google Scholar
  42. Wagemann K (2003): Stand der Entwicklungen, Perspektiven und Anstöße aus Sicht der DECHEMA. Fachgespräch zum UBA-Forschungsprojekt (FKZ 201 94 313). UBA-Texte 17/03. Berlin: Umweltbundesamt, 38Google Scholar
  43. WWF (2003): The social costs of chemicals - The costs and benefits of future chemicals policy in the European Union. A WWF chemicals and health campaign report prepared by Pearce D, Koundouri P (May 2003) http://panda.org/downloads/europe/1654reachcbafindoc.pdfGoogle Scholar
  44. Ylä-Mononen L (2004): Criteria for PBT substances, European Commission; Presented at the workshop ‘Sustainable Chemistry - Integrated Management of Chemicals, Products and Processes’, 27 to 29 January 2004, Dessau http://www.sustainable-chemistry.comGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Günter Steinhäuser
    • 1
  • Steffi Richter
    • 1
  • Petra Greiner
    • 1
  • Jutta Penning
    • 1
  • Michael Angrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt-UBA)Berlin

Personalised recommendations