End-of-life of a polypropylene bumper skin

Some key elements for a pragmatic environmental management
  • Rozenn Le Borgne
  • Pascal Feillard
LCA Case Studies


The aim of this article is to show how, at PSA peugeot-citroën, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used as a tool to evaluate the environmental burdens associated with a product, a process or an activity by identifying and quantifying energy, material used and wastes released to the environment.

In this paper, the LCA methodology is applied to a practical case study: the comparison of various end-of-life scenarios (recycling versus incineration with or without energy recovery with landfill as a reference) for a polypropylene (PP) bumper skin. All the LCA steps (goal, inventory, impacts assessment, interpretation) are developed in this study. It is shown that in the particular case of PP, incineration with energy recovery is on an environmental point of view between 30 and 60% recycling. However, due to some uncertainties on data quality, the absolute values of the inputs/outputs for the inventory step may not be sufficient to allow strong decision making and the use of the factorial experiments (Taguchi) is then proposed to select the dominant parameters of the study. Strong environmental conclusions can then be drawn from the study.


Bumper skin case studies LCA methodology Life Cycle Assessment peugeot-citroën polypropylene bumper skin 


  1. [1]
    Consoli F et al. (19939: Guidelines for life cycle assessment: a ‘code of practice1, in SETAC Workshop. Sesimbra (Portugal): SETAC, p. 69Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Tillman AM et al. (1994): Choice of system boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2 (1) 21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Le Borgne R et al. (1996): Life Cycle Analysis: a European Automotive Experience, in Conference Life Cycle Engineering of Passenger Cars-Resources-Production-Usage-Recycling. Wolfsburg (Germany): Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI), pp. 41–50Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Le Borgne R, Verpy C (1996): Life Cycle Analysis-Data and Technologies, European Council of Automotive Research (EUCAR), Report no. 13.5, February 1996Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Habersatter H, Widmer F (1991): Bilan écologique des matériaux d’emballage-Etat en 1990, Office Fédéral de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Paysage (OFEP), Report no. 132, February 1991Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Boustead I, Hancock CK (1981): Energy and packaging. Ellis Horwood Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ekvall T (1992): Life cycle assessment: pilot study on inventory methodology and databases, in Product Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and methodology. Copenhagen (Denmark): 9th Nordic Council of MinistersGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Heintz B, Baisnee PF (1991): System boundaries, in Life Cycle Assessment (Inventory, Classification, Valuation, Databases). Leiden (The Netherlands): SETAC Europe (Brussels-Belgium), pp. 35-52Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Finnveden G (1994): Some comments on the allocation problem and system boundaries in LCA. in European Workshop on Allocation in LCA. Leiden (The Netherlands): SETAC Europe Brussels, pp. 65–71Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Steen B, Ryding SO (1992): The EPS Enviro-Accounting method. An application of environmental accounting principles for evaluation and valuation of environmental impact in product design, Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Lindfors LG et al. (1995): Nordic Guidelines on Life Cycle Assessment. Copenhagen (Denmark): Nordic Council of Ministers, p. 222Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    OFEFP (1984): Bilan êcologique des matêriaux d’emballages. Office Fêdêral de l’Environnement des Forêts et du Paysage: Bern (Switzerland)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Jensen AA (1994): Classification of impacts into impact categories, in Workshop Life Cycle Assessment Methodology. ETH Zürich (Switzerland), pp. 65–67Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Van Der Berg NW et al. (1995): Beginning LCA; Guide into environmental Life Cycle Assessment. Utrecht (The Netherlands): National Reuse of Waste Research Programme NaOH-NOVEM, p. 52Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Guinee JB (1995): Development of a methodology for the environmental Life Cycle Assessment of products with a case study on margarines, Leiden, p. 225Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Heijungs R et al. (1992): Environmental life cycle assessment of products-Backgrounds. CML (Centre voor Milieukunde): Leiden (The Netherlands)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kennedy DJ et al. (1996): Data quality, stochastic environmental Life Cycle Assessment modelling, a probabilistic approach to incorporate variable input data quality. Int. J. LCA 1 (4) 199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Alexis J (1995): Pratique industrielle de la methode Taguchi. Paris (France): AFNOR, p. 170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rozenn Le Borgne
    • 1
  • Pascal Feillard
    • 1
  1. 1.PSA Peugeot-Citroën, Division of Research and Automobile Innovation, Chemin de la MalmaisonBievresFrance

Personalised recommendations