Comparison of several polysaccharide-derived chiral stationary phases for the enantiomer separation ofN-fluorenylmethoxy-carbonyl α-amino acids by hplc
- 95 Downloads
The liquid chromatographic enantiomer separation ofN-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (FMOC) protected α-amino acids was performed on nine polysaccharide-derived chiral stationary phases (CSPs). The cellulose derived coated CSPs, Chiralcel OD-H (separation factor = 1.09– 2.70) and Chiralcel OD (separation factor = 1.08–2.55), had the best performance of all the CSPs for resolution ofN-FMOC α-amino acids and therefore, all analyte enantiomers were base-line separated on Chiralcel OD-H and/or Chiralcel OD. Enantioseparation on cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) derived CSPs (Chiralcel OD-H, Chiralcel OD and Chiralpak IB) is generally greater than that on amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) derived CSPs (Chiralpak AD-RH, Chiralpak AD and Chiralpak IA). Additionally, coated type CSPs (Chiralcel OD-H or Chiralcel OD, and Chiralpak AD) generally provided better enantioseparation for these analytes than the covalently bonded type CSPs (Chiralpak IB and Chiralpak IA) with the same chiral selector of cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) and amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate), respectively. However, Chiralpak IB and Chiralpak IA had an advantage over the coated type CSPs in that a broader range of solvents could be used due to its covalently bonded nature.
Key wordsChiral stationary phase Enantiomer separation N-Fluorenylmethoxy-carbonyl α-amino acids
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bodansky, M. and Bodansky, A., The Practice of Peptide Synthesis. Springer, New York, (1984).Google Scholar
- Burgess, K., Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 3rd Ed., New York, (2000).Google Scholar
- Czerwenka, C., Lämmerhofer, M., and Lindner, W., Structure- enantioselectivity relationships for the study of chiral recognition in peptide enantiomer separation on cinchona alkaloid- based chiral stationary phases by HPLC: Influence of theN- terminal protecting group.J. Sep. Sci., 26, 1499–1508 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greene, T. W. and Wuts, P. G. M., Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis. John Wiley & Sons. Inc, 3rd Ed., New York, (1999).Google Scholar
- Knoche, B., Milosavljev, S., Gropper, S., Brunner, L. A., and Powell, M. L., Enantioselective determination of selfotel in human urine by high-performance liquid chromatography on a chiral stationary phase after derivatization with 9-fluorenyl- methyl chloroformate.J. Chromatogr. B, 695, 355–363 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lämmerhofer, M. and Lindner, W., Quinine and quinidine derivatives as chiral selectors I. Brush type chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography based on cinchonan carbamates and their application as chiral anion exchangers.J. Chromatogr. A, 741, 33–48 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pirkle, W. H. and Lee, W., Separation of the enantiomers of N- benzyloxycarbonyl, 9-fluoromethoxycarbonyl and phthaloyl protected α-amino acids and their ester or amide derivatives.Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc., 19, 1277–1280 (1998).Google Scholar
- Subramanian, G. (Ed.), A Practical Approach to Chiral Separations by Liquid Chromatography. VCH, New York, (1994).Google Scholar
- Tang, Y., Zukowski, J., and Armstrong, D. W., Investigation on enantiomeric separations of fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino acids and peptides by high-performance liquid chromatography using native cyclodextrins as chiral stationary phases.J. Chromatogr. A, 743, 261–271 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar