Advertisement

Acta Endoscopica

, 27:339 | Cite as

Pancréatite aiguë après CPRE

  • J. C. Paris
  • J. P. Caucanas
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Mot-clés

CPRE Pancréatites aiguës 

Références

  1. 1.
    TITTOBELLO A. — Diagnosis and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.Endoscopy, 1997,29, 285–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BILBAO M.K., DOTTER C.T., LEE T.G., KATON R.M. — Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a study of 10 000 cases.Gastroenterology, 1976,70, 314–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    SHERMAN S., LEHMAN G. — ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.Pancreas, 1991,6, 356–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    FREEMAN M.L., NELSON D.B., SHERMAN S., HABER G.B., HERMAN M.E., DORSCHER P.J.et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.N. Engl. J. Med., 1996,335, 909–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    WOTJUN S., GIL J., GIETKA W., GIL M. — Endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A prospective single-center study on the short-term and long-term. Treatment results in 483 patients.Endoscopy, 1997,29, 258–265.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    SKUDE G., WEHLIN L., MARUYAMA T., ARIYAMA J. — Hyperamylasemia after duodenoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Gut, 1976,17, 127–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    SHERMAN S., TROIANO F.P., HAWES R.H., LEHMAN G.A. — Sphincter of Oddi manometry: decreased risk of clinical pancreatitis with use of a modified aspirating catheter.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1990,36, 462–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    SHERMAN S., HAWES R.H., SCOTT W., RATHGABER S.W., UZER M.F., SMITH M.T.et al. — Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized, prospective study comparing a low and high-osmolality contrast agent.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1994,40, 422–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    JOHNSON G.K., GEENEN J.E., BEDFORD R.A. — A comparison of non ionic versus ionic contrast media: results of a prospective multicenter study.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1995,42, 312–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    TESTONI P.A., CICARDI M., BERGAMASCHINI L., GUZZONI S., CUGNO M., BUIZZA M.et al. — Infusion of C1 inhibitor plasma concentrate prevents hyperamylasemia induced by endoscopic sphincterotomy.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1995,42, 301–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    CAVALLINI G., TITTOBELLO A., FRULONII L., MASCI E., MARIANI A., DI FRANCESCO V.et al. — Gabexate for prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.N. Engl. J. Med., 1996,335, 919–923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    PASRICHA P.J., TIETJEN T.G., KALLOO A.N. — Pure cutting vs blended current for endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective blinded controlled trial (abstract).Gastrointest. Endosc., 1994,40, 31.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ELTA G.H., BARNETT J.L., BROWN K.A., Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy causes less post-procedure pancreatitis than blendes current (abstract).Gastrointest. Endosc., 1995,41, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’CONNOR H.J., BHUTTA A.S., REDMOND P.L., CARRUTHERS D.A. — Suprapapillary fistulosphincterotomy at ERCP: A prospective study.Endoscopy, 1997,29, 266–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SHERMAN S., RUFFOLO T.A., HAWES R.H. — Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts.Gastroenterology, 1991,101, 1068–1075.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    BOENDER J., NIX G.A., DE RIDDER M.A. — Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: factors influencing the complication rate.Endoscopy, 1994,26, 209–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    CHEN Y.K., FOLIENTE R.L., SANTORO M.J., WALTER M.E., COLLEN M.J. — Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with non dilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1994,89, 327–333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    FREEMAN M.L. — Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review.Endoscopy, 1997,29, 288–297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    COTTON P.B., GEENEN J.E., SHERMAN S. — Sphincterotomy for stones is safer than advertised, even in young patients with smaller ducts: a multicenter prospective study (abstract).Gastrointest. Endosc., 1994,40, 104.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MEHTA S.N., PAVONE E., BOUCHARD S., BARKUN J.S., BARKUN A.N. — Predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis (abstract).Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1996,91, 1938.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    TARNASKY P., CUNNINGHAM J., COTTON P., HOFFMAN B., PALESCH Y., FREEMAN J., CURRY N., HAWES R. — Pancreatic sphincter hypertension increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis.Endoscopy, 1997,29, 252–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    NEOPTOLEMOS J.P., SHAW D.E., CARR-LOCKE D.L. — A multivariate analysis of perioperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones.Ann. Surg., 1989,209, 157–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ESCOURROU J., DELVAUX M., BUSCAIL L., FREGEVU J., FREXINOS J., RIBET A. — Clinical results of endoscopic sphincterotomy: comparison of two activity periods in the same endoscopy unit.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1990,36, 205–206.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    GOTTLIEB K., SHERMAN S., PEZZI J., ESBER E., LEHMAN G.A. — Early recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis by clinical assessment and serum pancreatic enzymes.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1996,91, 1553–1557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DE VRIES J.H., DUIJM L.E.M., DEKKER W., GUIT G.L., FERWERDA J., SCHOLTEN E.T. — CT before and after ERCP: detection of pancreatic pseudotumor, asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation, and duodenal diverticulum.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1997,45, 231–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    HUSAIN S., GARMAGER K., MCPHEE M.S.et al. — The significance of retroperitoneal air following endoscopic sphincterotomy [abstract].Gastrointest. Endosc., 1995,41, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    PRAT F., MALAK N.A., PELLETIER G., BUFFET C., FRITSCH J., CHOURY A.D., ALTMAN C., LIGUORY C., ETIENNE J.P. — Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.Gastroenterology, 1996,110, 894–899.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    MOREAUX J. — Traditional surgical management of common bile duct stones: a prospective study during a 20-year experience.Am. J. Sur., 1995,169, 220–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    ASBURN H.J., ROSSI R.L., HEISS F.W., SHEA J.A. — Acute relapsing pancreatitis as a complication of papillary stenosis after endoscopic sphincterotomy.Gastroenterology, 1993,104, 1814–1817.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    THAM T.C.K., VANDERVOORT J., WONG R.C.K., LICHTENSTEIN D.R., VAN DAM J., RUYMANN F.et al. — Therapeutic ERCP in outpatients.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1997,45, 225–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    CAUCANAS J.P., LAPUELLE J., CASSIGNEUL J., CLANET J., COULOM P., RUMEAU J. — Pancréatite après cholangiopancréatographie rétrograde par voie endoscopique (CPRE).Acta. Endoscopica., 1994,24, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Paris
    • 2
  • J. P. Caucanas
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinique des Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif, Clinique PasteurToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Clinique des Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif et de la NutritonHôpital Claude-HuriezLille Cedex

Personalised recommendations