Abstract
There is no uniformly accepted definition of a positive margin in breast conserving surgery. In 1999, the Japanese Breast Cancer Society created the “Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Treatment”(GBCT). At that time, we did a questionnaire survey about the definition of margin status. Although 57.1% of hospitals/institutes used the definition of cancer cells present at the surface, the GBCT adopted the definition of cancer cells present within 5 mm of the surface. Moreover, the GBCT required that the distance between the edge of the cancer cells and the surface be recorded in millimeters when cancer cells were present within 5 mm of the surface.
The risk factors for local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment were studied. From 1986 to 1995, 391 patients were treated with breast-conserving surgery at Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases. Of these, 35 patients developed local recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that positive margin (p = 0.0002), high degree of ductal proliferative change around the tumor (p = 0.0035) and high histological grade (p = 0.0041) were significant independent risk factors for local recurrence, while radiation therapy (p = 0.0327) significantly reduced local recurrence. There was no significant difference in the risk of local recurrence between the two different definitions of positive margin (tumor present at the surface and tumor present within 5 mm from the surface).
It is hoped that more hospitals/institutes will adopt the definition of margin positivity presented by the GBCT and that a practical definition of margin positivity will be established.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL: Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens. A clinically oriented approach.Am J Clin Pathol 98:125–137, 1992.
Komoike Y, Motomura K, Inaji H,et al: Long-term results of breast conserving surgery for stage I and II breast cancer: experiences at Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases.Beast Cancer 9:248–253, 2000.
“Guideline for Breast-Conserving Therapy”by Japanese Breast Cancer Society, 1999.
Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P,et al: Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation.N Eng J Med 345:1378–1387, 2001.
Akiyama F, Sakamoto G: Breast conservative therapy, practice in pathology.Byouri to Rinsho 15:41–49, 1997 (in Japanese).
Kasugai T, Mano M, Ishiguro S,et al: Intra- and postoperative pathological approach in “The practice of breast conservative therapy”edited by Koyama A, pp43–48, 1998.
General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Recording of Breast Cancer edited by Japanese Breast Cancer Society (The 12th Edition), 1996.
Ellis CW, Elston IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.Histopathology 19:403–410, 1991.
Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ,et al: Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.Cancer 78:1921–1928, 1996.
Noguchi S, Koyama H, Kasugai T,et al: A case-control study on risk factors for local recurrences or distant metastases in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.Oncology 54:468–474, 1997.
Ichihara S, Suzuki H, Kasami M,et al: A new method of margin evaluation in breast conservation surgery using an adjustable mould during fixation.Histopathology 39:85–92, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kasugai, T., Yoshida, Y., Sakai, K. et al. Pathological approach to breast conserving therapy. Breast Cancer 11, 350–355 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968042
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968042