Skip to main content
Log in

Techniques for the neurological examination of taxane-induced neuropathy

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taxanes are considered to be the key drugs in the treatment of breast cancer. Although physicians who treat patients with breast cancer have rarely seen patients with neuropathy as an adverse effect of treatment before the advent of taxanes, patients with breast cancer who are treated with taxanes frequent-ly exhibit peripheral neuropathy. As peripheral neuropathy often causes deterioration of the quality of life of patients, it is very important to precisely assess the extent of peripheral neuropathy at an early stage. Clinical oncologists should be familiar with the techniques of neurological examination. In this article we describe the basic techniques for the neurological examination of patients with tax-ane-induced peripheral neuropathy. In the hope of facilitating the precise evaluation of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy, the items of neurological examinations in this article are described with reference to the physician neuroexamination form (PNEF) designed by BioNumerik Pharmaceuticals Inc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PNEF:

Physician Neuroexamination Form

CSPOR-BC:

Comprehensive Support Project for Oncological Research of Breast Cancer

N-SAS BC:

National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer

HOR:

Health Outcome Research

References

  1. Holmes FA, Walters RS, Theriault RL, Forman AD, Newton LK, Raber MN, Buzdar AU, Frye DK, Hortobagyi GN: Phase II trial of Taxol, an active drug in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1797–1805, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reichman BS, Seidman AD, Crown JPA, Heelan R, Hakes TB, Lebwohl DE, Gilewski TA, Surbone A, Currie V, Hudis CA, Yao TJ, Klecker R, Jamis-Dow C, Collins J, Quinlivan S, Berkery R, Toomasi F, Canetta R, Fisherman J, Arbuck S, Norton L: Paclitaxel and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.J Clin Oncol 11:1943–1951, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D, Printer T, Belle SV, Vorobiof D, Duarte R, Gil MG, Bodrogi I, Murray E, Yelle L, von Minckwitz G, Korec S, Simmonds P, Buzzi F, Mancha RG, Richardson G, Walpole E, Ronzoni M, Murawsky M, Alakl M, Riva A, Crown J: Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.J Clin Oncol 17:2341–2354, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, Cirrincione CT, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, Ingle JN, Cooper MR, Hayes DF, Tkaczuk KH, Fleming G, Holland JF, Duggan DB, Carpenter JT, Frei E 3rd, Schilsky RL, Wood WC, Muss HB, Norton L: Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer.J Clin Oncol 21:976–983, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mamounas EP, Bryant J, Lembersky BC, Fisher B, Atkins JN, Fehrenbacher L, Raich PC, Yothers G, Soran A, Wolmark N: Paclitaxel following doxoru-bicin/cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:4 (Abstract 12), 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nabholtz JM, Pienkowski T, Mackey J, Pawlicki M, Guastalla JP, Vogel C, Weaver C, Walley B, Martin M, Chap L, Tomiak E, Juhos E, Guevin R, Howell A, Hainsworth J, Foraander T, Blitz S, Gazel S, Loret C, Riva A: Phase III trial comparing TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) with FAC (5-fluo-rouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node positive breast cancer patients: interim analysis of the BCIRG 001 study.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:36a (Abstract 141), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. van den Bent MJ, van Raaij-van den Aarssen VJM, Verweij J Doom PAV, Sillevis Smitt PAE: Progression of paclitaxel induced neuropathy following discontinuation of treatment.Muscle Nerve 20:750–752, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMyer WE: Technique of the neurological examination: A programmed text. Fourth edition, McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sugiura K: Illustrated guide to the neurologic examination. Ishiyaku Publishers Inc, Tokyo, 1993 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hilkens PHE, and van den Bent MJ: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.J Periper Nerv Syst 2:350–361, 1997.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendell JR, Kissel JT, Cornblath DR: Diagnosis and management of peripheral nerve disorders. Oxford University Press Inc, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iwata M: Textbook of symptomatology in neurology. Igaku-shoin, Tokyo, 1994 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shozo Ohsumi.

About this article

Cite this article

Ohsumi, S., Sunada, Y. Techniques for the neurological examination of taxane-induced neuropathy. Breast Cancer 11, 86–91 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968009

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968009

Key words

Navigation