Science educators as active collaborators in meeting the educational needs of students with disabilities

  • Greg Stefanich


Science Teacher Disable Learner Special Education Teacher Exceptional Child Cooperative Teaching 


  1. Atwood, R. K., & Oldham, B. R. (1985). Teacher’s perceptions of mainstreaming in an inquiry-oriented elementary science program.Science Education, 69, 619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cawley, J. F. (1994). Science for students with disabilities.Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 67–71.Google Scholar
  3. Cawley, J.F., Kahn, H., & Tedesco, A. (1989). Vocational education and students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 630–634.Google Scholar
  4. Center for Multisensory Learning. (1981).SAVI/SELPH. Berkeley: University of California, Lawrence Hall of Science.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, M. M. (1987). Beyond ability grouping: A review of the effectiveness of ability grouping and its alternatives.School Psychology Review, 16(3), 348–369.Google Scholar
  6. Donahoe, K., & Zigmond, N. (1988, April).High school grades of urban LD students and low-achieving peers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students.Harvard Educational Review, 57(4), 367–395.Google Scholar
  8. Harry, B. (1992).Cultural diversity, families, and the special education system. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boy Scouts of America. (1985).The Boy Scout Handbook (9th ed.). Irving, TX: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Hofman, H. (1994). Learning disabilities. In J. Engelston-Dodd (Ed.),A future agenda: Proceedings of a working conference on science for persons with disabilities (pp. 72–87). Cedar Falls: University of Northern Iowa.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, C. J. (1992).Enhancing self-concepts and achievements of mildly handicapped students. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  12. Lang, H. G. (1994).Silence of the spheres: The deaf experience in the history of science. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  13. Lovitt, T. C., & Horton, S. V. (1994). Strategies for adapting science textbooks for youth with learning disabilities.Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 105–116.Google Scholar
  14. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (Eds.). (1992).Guidelines for effective mainstreaming in science. West Lafayette, IN: Mainstream Instruction for Scientific Literacy.Google Scholar
  15. Oakes, J. (1986). Keeping track, part 1: The policy and practice of curriculum inequality.Phi Delta Kappan, 68(1), 12–17.Google Scholar
  16. Parmar, R. S., DeLuca, C. B., & Janczak, T. M. (1994). Investigations into the relationship between science and language abilities.Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 117–126.Google Scholar
  17. Patton, J., Polloway, E., & Cronin, M. (in press). Science education for the mildly handicapped students: A status report.Science Education.Google Scholar
  18. Raizen, S. (1988).Increasing educational productivity through improving the science curriculum. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Policy Research in Education.Google Scholar
  19. Stainback, W., Stainback, S., & Bunch, G. (1989). Introduction and historical background. In S. Stainback, W. Stainback, & M. Forest (Eds.),Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 3–14). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  20. Takes, M. J. (1993).Cooperative teaching as a method of collaboration between regular and special educators in an integrated setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls.Google Scholar
  21. United States Department of Education. (1990).Digest of educational statistics. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  22. United States Department of Education. (1991).America 2000: An education strategy. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. S. (1988). Enhancing success in heterogeneous classrooms and schools: The power of partnership.Teacher Education and Special Education, 11(4), 144–154.Google Scholar
  24. Wang, M. C., & Birch, J. W. (1994). Comparison of a full-time mainstreaming program and a resource room.Exceptional Children, 51(1), 33–40.Google Scholar
  25. Wang, M. C., & Reynolds, M. C. (1985). Avoiding the “catch 22” in special education reform.Exceptional Children, 51(6), 497–502.Google Scholar
  26. Wang, M. C., & Wahlberg, H. J. (1988). Four fallacies of segregationalism.Exceptional Children, 55(2), 128–137.Google Scholar
  27. Weisgerber, R. A. (1991).Science success for students with disabilities. Redding, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  28. Whitmore, J. (1981). Gifted children with handicapping conditions: A new frontier.Exceptional Children, 48, 106–114.Google Scholar
  29. Wolfensberger, W., & Thomas, S. (1983).Program analysis of service system’s implementation of normalization goals. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  30. Woodward, J. (1994). The role of models in secondary science instruction.Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for the Education of Teachers in Science 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg Stefanich
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Northern IowaCedar Falls

Personalised recommendations