Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 29–36 | Cite as

Reading in science: Developing an operational conception to guide instruction

  • Larry D. Yore
  • James A. Shymansky
Article

Keywords

Science Teacher Reading Comprehension Instructional Strategy Reading Process Textual Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvermann, D. E., & Swafford, J. (1989). Do content area strategies have a research base?Journal of Reading, 32, 388–394.Google Scholar
  2. Armbruster, B., Anderson, T., & Ostertag, J. (1989) Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing.Reading Teacher, 43, 130–137.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. W. (1987). Strategic teaching in science. In B. F. Jones, A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, & E. G. Carr (Eds.),Strategic Teaching and Learning: Cognitive Instruction in the Content Areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Anderson, M. D. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information on connected discourse.American Educational Research Journal, 15, 433–440.Google Scholar
  5. Bransford, J. D. (1979).Human Learning, Understanding and Remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A. L. (1982). Learning how to learn from reading. In J. A. Langer & M. T. Smith-Burke (Eds.),Reader Meets Author/Bridging the Gap. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  7. Champagne, A. B. (1985, April). Structured peer interactions and physical science learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  8. Denning, D., & Yore, L. D. (1987). Science reading in B. C. secondary schools.B.C. Catalyst, 31 (2), 15–18.Google Scholar
  9. Farrell, R. T., & Cirrincione, J. M. (1984). State certificates in reading for content area teachers.Journal of Reading, 28, 152–157.Google Scholar
  10. Flood, J. (1986). The text, the student, and the teacher: Learning from exposition in middle school.Reading Teacher, 39, 784–791.Google Scholar
  11. Holliday, W. G. (1988, April). Studying science information using metacognitive knowledge and experiences. A paper presented at National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, Lake Ozark, MO.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction.Educational Psychologist, 22, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobowitz, T. (1988) Using theory to modify practice: An illustration with SQ3R.Journal of Reading, 32, 126–131.Google Scholar
  14. Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Some unexpected issues in prior knowledge and comprehension.Reading Teacher, 37, 760–764.Google Scholar
  15. Maria, K., & MacGinitie, W. (1987) Learning from texts that refute the reader’s prior knowledge.Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 222–238.Google Scholar
  16. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984).Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Osborne, R. J., & Freyberg, P. (1985).Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  18. Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process.Science Education, 67, 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. In L. B. Resnick, J. H. Larkin, & R. C. Anderson (Eds.),Cognition and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Paris, S. G. (1987).Reading and thinking strategies. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  21. Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction.Elementary School Journal, 88, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pearson, P. D., & Spiro, R. (1982, May). The new buzz word in reading is schema.Instructor, 46–48.Google Scholar
  23. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989) Strategies that improve childrens’ memory and comprehension of text.Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson, F. P. (1941).Effective Study. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  25. Rumelhart, D. E. (1976).Toward an Interactive Model of Reading (Tech. Rep. No. 56). San Diego: University of California, Center for Human Information Processing.Google Scholar
  26. Samuels, S. J. (1983). A cognitive approach to factors influencing reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Research, 76, 261–266.Google Scholar
  27. Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Good, R. (1991). Elementary teachers’ beliefs and perceptions of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks, and supportive instructional factors.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.).Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Steward, O., & Tei, E. (1983). Some implications of metacognition for reading instruction.Journal of Reading, 27, 36–43.Google Scholar
  30. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Witrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research in Science Teaching (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory.Human Development, 21, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wittrock, M. C. (1981). Reading comprehension. In F. J. Pirozzolo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.),Neuropsychological and cognitive processes of reading. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wittrock, M. C., Marks, C., & Doctorow, M. (1975). Reading as a generative process.Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yore, L. D. (1984).Content area reading activities: Science. Toronto: Doubleday Canada.Google Scholar
  35. Yore, L. D. (1987). A preliminary exploration of grade five students’ achievement and ability to read science textbooks as a function of gender, reading vocabulary, and reading comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 282 728)Google Scholar
  36. Yore, L. D. (1991). Secondary Science teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about science reading and science textbooks.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yore, L. D., & Denning, D. (1989). Implementing change in secondary science reading and textbook usage: A desired image, a current profile and a plan for change. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305 270)Google Scholar
  38. Yore, L. D., & Shymansky, J. A. (1985). Reading, understanding, remembering and using information in written science materials. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 258 825)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for the Education of Teachers in Science 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry D. Yore
    • 1
  • James A. Shymansky
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Social and Natural SciencesUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.University of IowaUSA

Personalised recommendations