Conclusion
We find that we can account quite well for the observed primary charge distribution by assuming (quite artificially) a model in which the original radiation consists only of iron (*). After about three mean free paths (6 g/cm2) a charge distribution is obtained which resembles very much the observed values. The good agreement is possible only if one uses results on «p » and «α» fragments obtained from meteorite measurements, and if one uses the smaller fragmentation probabilities obtained by the Bristol group for Li, Be and B.
Similar content being viewed by others
Refeeences
B. Peters inProgress in Cosmic Ray Physics, vol.1 (Amsterdam, 1952).
P. Morrison, S. Olbert andB. Rossi:Phys. Rev.,94, 440 (1954).
B. Rossi:Suppl. Nuovo Cimento,2, 275 (1955).
A. D. Dainton, P. H. Fowler andD. W. Kent:Phil. Mag.,43, 317 (1952).
S. F. Singer:Proc. of Duke Univ. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Nov. 1953), ed. by L. Nordheim (1954);S. F. Singer:Phys. Bev.,98, 1163 (1955) (A).
V. L. Ginzburg:Usp. Phys. Nauk,51, 343 (1953);V. L. Ginzburg,S. B. Pikel’ner andI. S. Sklovskij:Astron. Žu. SSSR,32, 503 (1955).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work has been supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Contract AF 18(600)-1038.
On the other hand Ginzburg and Fradkin [14] consider that they can explain the primary charge spectrum without an original enhancement of the heavies; however they useN L:N M⩽0.1 and large values for the relevant fragmentation probabilities. Therefore their conclusion is not surprising.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, S.F. On the origin of the charge spectrum of the primary cosmic radiation. Nuovo Cim 8 (Suppl 2), 549–555 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02962572
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02962572