Skip to main content
Log in

Fair electronic cash based on double signatures

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to decrease crimes such as money laundering, blackmailing etc. in electronic cash systems, fair electronic cash has been a major focus of academic research in electronic commence. When a bank finds some dubious cash or owner, the trusted entity or trustee can help him to revoke the anonymity of the cash. In the previous protocols, the trustee knows all the information of the cash whether he is trusted or not, that is, he can trace the user or cash unconditionally. Furthermore, the dishonest trustee may deceive a user, which means that he may withdraw cash while tracing other users. Such cases are unfair to the honest users.

A new fair electronic cash protocol based on untrustworthy trustees is proposed in this paper. The key idea is that the coin structure should include the signatures of both the trustee and the bank so that the trustee shares the information of the cash with the bank, while we do not use the secret sharing scheme. In contrast with the previous protocols, neither the trustee nor the bank can trace the money without the help of the other entity. In this way, the privacy of the user is protected furthest. Also, the trustee is off-line in the protocol, which means that he will not be involved in withdrawing the cash. Therefore, the protocol is efficient for implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaum D. Blind signature for untraceable payments. InProc. Eurocrypt’82, Plenum Press, 1983, pp.199–203.

  2. Chaum D, Fiat A, Naor M. Untraceable electronic cash. InProc. Crypto’88, LNCS 1000, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp.84–95.

  3. Brands S. Untraceable off-line cash in wallet with observers. InProc. Crypto’93, LNCS 773, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994, pp.302–318.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brickell E, Gemmell P, Kravitz D. Trustee-based tracing extension to anonymous cash and the marking of anonymous change. InProc. 6th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 1995, pp.457–466.

  5. Stadler M, Piveteau J M, Camenisch J. Fair blind signatures. InProc. Eurocrypt’95, LNCS 921, Springer-Verlag, 1995, pp.209–219.

  6. Camenisch J, Maurer U, Stadle M. Digital payment systems with passive anonymity-revoking trustees. InProc. Computer Security Esorics’96, LNCS 1146, Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp.33–43.

  7. Frankel Y, Tsiounis Y, Yung M. Indirect discourse proofs: Achieving fair off-line e-cash. InProc. Asiacrypt’96, LNCS 1163, Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp.286–300.

  8. Jakobsson M, Yung M. Revocable and versatile e-money. InProc. 3rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ACM Press, India, 1996, pp.76–87.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Camenisch J, Maurer U, Stadle M. An efficient fair payment system. InProc. 3rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ACM Press, India, 1996, pp.88–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Davida G, Frankei Y, Tsiounis Y, Yung M. Anonymity control in e-cash systems. InProc. Financial Cryptography’97, LNCS 1318, Springer-Verlag, 1997, pp.1–16.

  11. Juels A. Trustee tokens: Simple and practical anonymous digital coin tracing. InProc. Financial Cryptography’99, LNCS 1648, Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp.33–43.

  12. Sander T, Ta Shma A. Flow control: A new approach for anonymity control in electronic systems. InProc. Financial Cryptography’99, LNCS 1648, Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp.46–61.

  13. Sander T, Ta Shma A. Auditable, anonymous electronic cash. InProc. Crypto’99, LNCS 1648, Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp.555–572.

  14. Solms B V, Naccache D. On blind signatures and perfect crimes.Computers and Security, 1992, 11(6): 581–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pointcheval D. Self-scrambling anonymizers. InProc. Financial Cryptography’00, Springer-Verlag, 2000. Available at: http://cgi.di.ens.fr/cgi-bin/pointche/publications.html.

  16. Brands S. Untraceable off-line cash in wallets with observers. InProc. Crypto’93, LNCS 839, Springer-Verlag, 1993, pp.302–318.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60073052 and 19931010).

CHEN Xiaofeng was born in 1976. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Northwest University in 1998 and the M.S. degree in mathematics from Northwest University in 2000. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in cryptography at Xidian University. His research interests are electronic commerce and elliptic curve cryptography.

WANG Changjie was born in 1974. He received the B.S. and M.S. degrees from the School of Communication Engineering, Xidian University in 1996 and 1999. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in cryptography at Xidian University. His research interests are electronic commerce and network security.

WANG Yumin was born in 1936. He is now a professor and Ph.D. advisor in Xidian University, and a member of IEEE. His research interests are communication, information theory, coding and cryptography.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Wang, C. & Wang, Y. Fair electronic cash based on double signatures. J. Compt. Sci. & Technol. 17, 830–835 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960773

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960773

Keywords

Navigation