The Botanical Review

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 317–353 | Cite as

The Characeae, 1951

  • R. D. Wood


Botanical Review Botulism Freshwater Alga Internodal Cell Protoplasmic Streaming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Agardh, C. A. 1824. Systema Algarum. Lund.Google Scholar
  2. - ex Bruzelius. [cf. Bruzelius].Google Scholar
  3. Allen, G. O. 1925. Notes on Charophytes from Gonda, U. P. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.30(3): 589–599, pl. 1–5.Google Scholar
  4. -. 1927. [cf. Groves, J., and G. O. Allen].Google Scholar
  5. —. 1928. Charophyte notes from Saharanpur, U. P. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.7(2): 49–69, fig. 1–13, pl. 1–5.Google Scholar
  6. -. 1935. [cf. Groves, J.].Google Scholar
  7. —. 1936. Charophyte notes from Bareilly. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.15(1): 51–54.Google Scholar
  8. - ex Filarszky. 1936. [cf. Filarszky].Google Scholar
  9. —. 1938. Notes on British Charophytes. Jour. Bot.76: 48–50.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1940. Charophyta.In The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to Lake Titicaca in 1937. Trans. Linn. Soc. [London], (Bot.) III,1(2): 155–160.Google Scholar
  11. -. 1942. On the distribution of some Indian Charophytes. Royal Bot. Garden, Calcutta, 150th Anniv. Vol., Part 2: 183–189.Google Scholar
  12. -. 1950. British stoneworts (Charophyta). Haslemere. Figs. 1–52.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1951. Notes on Charophyta from British Columbia. Proc. Linn. Soc. [London]162(2): 148–152, 2 figs.Google Scholar
  14. — andW. G. Herter. 1934. Charales Uruguayensis. Revista Sudamer. Bot.1(3): 87–91, 1 fig.Google Scholar
  15. Allen, T. F. 1880. Characeae Americanae Exsiccatae. Fasc. I and II. [for dates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948].Google Scholar
  16. —. 1882. Development of the cortex inChara. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club9(4): 37–47, pl. 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —. 1883. Notes on the American species ofTolypella. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club10(10): 109–117, pl. 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —. 1887. Some notes on Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club14(10): 211–215, pl. 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. -. 1888a. Characeae Americanae Exsiccatae. Fasc. III and IV. [for dates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948].Google Scholar
  20. —. 1888b.Nitella (notTolypella) Macounii. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club15(1): 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. -. 1888c. The Characeae of America. Part 1: 1–64, fig. 1–54. New York.Google Scholar
  22. —. 1889. Characeae.In N. L. Britton, Catalogue of plants found in New Jersey. Geol. Survey N. J., Final Rep. State Geol.2: 356–357.Google Scholar
  23. —. 1892a. Notes on some Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club19(7): 230.Google Scholar
  24. -. 1892b. The Characeae of America, Part2, Fasc. 1: 1–8, pl. 1–8. New York. [for numbering of plates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948c: 334–335].Google Scholar
  25. —. 1893a. Notes on new Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club20(3): 119–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. —. 1893b. Notes on some Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club20(6): 258.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1894a. Remarks onChara gymnopus A. Br. with descriptions of new species ofChara andNitella. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club21 (4): 162–167, pl. 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. —. 1894b. Japanese Characeae. I. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club21(12): 523–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. —. 1894c. Notes onChara sejuncta A. Br. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club21(12): 526.Google Scholar
  30. -. 1894d. The Characeae of America, Part2, Fasc. 2: 9–17, pl. 19–17. New York. [for numbering of plates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948c: 334–335].Google Scholar
  31. —. 1895. Japanese Characeae. II. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club22(2): 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. —. 1896a.Nitella subspicata sp. nov. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club23(1): 6–7, pl. 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. —. 1896b. A new species ofNitella belonging to theN. flexilis series, with a review of allied species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club23(12): 533, pl. 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. —. 1896c. New species ofNitella belonging to the monoecious acuminatae group, with a review of allied species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club23(12): 534–536, pl. 285, 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. -. 1896d. The Characeae of America. Part2, Fasc. 3: 19–28, pl. 18–27. New York, [for numbering of plates, cf. Wood R. D., 1948c: 334–335].Google Scholar
  36. —. 1898. Contributions to Japanese Characeae. III. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club25: 73–82, 18 unnumbered plates. [the plates appeared only with reprints].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —. 1900. Three new charas from California. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club27(6): 299–304, pl. 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Arnold, G. E. 1935. Weed growths in reservoirs and open canals. Jour. Am. Water Works Ass’n.27(12): 1684–1693.Google Scholar
  39. Ascherson, P. 1878. Noch einige Bemerkunge über die orientalischen Schismus-Formen und über Pflanzen der kleinen Oase. Oesterr. Bot. Zeits.28: 254–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Aspegren, G. C. 1823. Försök till en Blekingsk Flora. Carlskrona.Google Scholar
  41. Avetta, C. 1898. Nuova specie dieChara (Chara Pelosiana mihi). Malpighia12(5–8): 229–235.Google Scholar
  42. Baker, J. G. 1887. Further contributions to the Flora of Madagascar. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)22: 441–537. [cf. p. 537, by H. & J. Groves].Google Scholar
  43. Bauer ex Reichenbach. 1829. [cf. Reichenbach].Google Scholar
  44. Blinks, L. R. andM. J. Pickett. 1940. The effect of oxidants and reductants upon the bioelectric potential ofNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.24(1): 33–34, 8 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Braun, A. 1834. Esquisse monographique du genreChara. Ann. Sci. Nat. II. Bot.1: 349–357.Google Scholar
  46. —. 1835. Uebersicht der genauer bekannten Chara-Arten. Flora18(1): 49–73.Google Scholar
  47. —. 1843a. Charae Preissianae adiectis reliquis speciebus e nova hollandia hucusque cognitis. Linnaea17: 113–119.Google Scholar
  48. —. 1843b.In Drége und Meyer, Zwei pflanzeng. Documente. Flora2: 1–230. [cf. C. grandis, p. 137].Google Scholar
  49. - ex Kützing. 1845. [cf. Kützing].Google Scholar
  50. -. 1845. [Additional notices of the North American Characeae].In G. Engelmann and A. Gray, Plantae Lindheimerianae. Boston Jour. Nat. Hist.5(2): 264, footnote.Google Scholar
  51. —. 1847a. Uebersicht der schweizerischen Characeen. Neue Denkschr. Schweiz. Ges. Naturw.10(3): 1–23. [for date, cf. Bot. Zeit.7: 872, 1849. Signature date on reprints, 1847].Google Scholar
  52. —. 1847b.Chara Kokeilii, eine neue deutsche Art, beschrieben von Alexander Braun, Professor der Botanik in Freiburg in Breisgau. Flora30(2): 17–29.Google Scholar
  53. —. 1849a. Charae australes et antarcticae, or characters and observations on the Characeae of Australia and the southern circumpolar regions. Hooker Jour. Bot. & Kew Gard. Misc.1: 193–203.Google Scholar
  54. —. 1849b. Characeae Indiae orientalis et insularum maris pacifici; or characters and observations on the Characeae of the East Indian Continent, Ceylon, Sunda Islands, Marians, and Sandwich Islands. Hooker Jour. Bot. & Kew Gard. Misc.,1: 292–301.Google Scholar
  55. - ex Kützing. 1849. [cf. Kützing].Google Scholar
  56. —. 1852. Plantae Muellerianae. Linnaea25: 704–709.Google Scholar
  57. - ex Wallman, 1853. [cf. Wallman].Google Scholar
  58. — 1858 [?]. [Characeen aus Columbien, Guyana und Mittelamerika]. Monatsber. Künig. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1858): 349–368. 1859. [confirmation for 1858 has not been obtained].Google Scholar
  59. - ex Brébisson. 1859. [cf. Brébisson].Google Scholar
  60. -. 1860. Characeae.In J. D. Hooker, Flora Tasmaniae Vol. 2: 159–160. London.Google Scholar
  61. - ex Leonhardi. 1863. [cf. Leonhardi].Google Scholar
  62. - ex Leonhardi. 1864. [cf. Leonhardi].Google Scholar
  63. -. 1866. Characeen.In G. von Marten, Die Preussische Expedition nach Ost-Asien. Bot. Theil. “Die Tange”. Berlin. [cf. p. 143].Google Scholar
  64. —. 1867[?]. Die Characeen Afrika’s. Monatsber. Künig. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1867): 782–800, 873–944. [reprinted and repaged consecutively 782–872, and possibly issued in 1867; the journal appeared in 1868].Google Scholar
  65. -. 1873. Characeae.In G. Zeller, On Burmese algae. Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal42: [cf. p. 193, appendix].Google Scholar
  66. - in Cohn. 1876. [cf. Cohn].Google Scholar
  67. - in Ascherson. 1878. [cf. Ascherson, p. 257].Google Scholar
  68. - in Nordstedt. 1880. [cf. Nordstedt, p. 16].Google Scholar
  69. - andC. F. O. Nordstedt. 1882. Fragmente einer Monographie der Characeen. Nach der hinterlassenen Manuscripten A. Braun’s, herausgegeben von Dr. O. Nordstedt. pp. 1–211, pl. 1–7. Berlin. [also, Abh. König. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1882): l– 1–7, 1883].Google Scholar
  70. Brébisson, A. de. 1859. Flore de la Normandie. 3d ed. Caen.Google Scholar
  71. Britton, N. L. 1918. Flora of Bermuda.Google Scholar
  72. - andC. F. Millspaugh. 1920. The Bahama Flora. New York. [cf. pp. 617–618, largely by C. B. Robinson].Google Scholar
  73. Brooks, Matilda M. 1927. Studies on the permeability of living cells. VIII. The effect of chlorides upon the penetration of dahlia intoNitella. Protoplasma11: 420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Brown, R. 1810. Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae van-Dieman. London.Google Scholar
  75. - ex Braun. 1843. [cf. A. Braun, 1843a: 118].Google Scholar
  76. Bruzelius, A. 1824. Observationes in genusChara. Dissert., Lund. pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  77. Caballero, A. 1919. LaChara foetida A. Br., y las larvas deStegomyia, Culex yAnopheles. Bol. Royal Soc. Española Hist. Nat. Madrid19: 449–455.Google Scholar
  78. Cedercreutz, C. 1933. Die Characeen Finnlands. Mem. Soc. Fauna et Flora Fennica8: 241–254.Google Scholar
  79. Chevallier, F. E. 1827. Flore Générale des environs de Paris. Vol. 2: 123–128. Paris.Google Scholar
  80. -. 1836. Flore Générale des environs de Paris. ed. 2. Paris. [non vidi].Google Scholar
  81. Cohn, F. 1876. Kryptogamen-Flora von Schlesien. Vol. 1. [Characeen, by A. Braun, pp. 355–411]. Breslau.Google Scholar
  82. Collins, F. S. andA. B. Hervey. 1917. The algae of Bermuda. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts & Sci.53(1): 1–196, 6 pl. [cf.Chara on p. 67].Google Scholar
  83. Colmeiro, A. M. 1867. Enumeracion de las Criptógamas de España y Portugal. Vol. 2. Madrid. [cf. pp. 222–224].Google Scholar
  84. Cook, S. F. 1926. The toxic action of copper onNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.9(6): 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Corillion, Abbé R. 1946. Contribution à l’étude des Charophycées du Massif amoricain. Bull. Soc. Sci. Bretagne21: 77–96.Google Scholar
  86. —. 1947. Addition à la flore Charologique de l’Ouest de la France. Bull. Soc. Bot. France94: 43–46.Google Scholar
  87. Crepin, F. 1863. Les Characées de Belgique. Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg.2(2): 115–131.Google Scholar
  88. Crocker, W. 1948. Growth of plants. Reinhold Publ. Corp., New York.Google Scholar
  89. Daily, Fay Kenoyer. 1949.Chara Kieneri, a new species from Nebraska. Butler Univ. Bot. Stud.9: 127–130, 1 pl.Google Scholar
  90. DeCandolle, A. R. 1813. Catalogus Plantarum Horti Botanici Monspeliensis. Monspelii. [cf. Chara, p. 12].Google Scholar
  91. Desfontaine, R. 1800. Flora Atlantica, sive Historia Plantarum quae in Atlante, Agro Tunetano et Algeriensi Crescunt. Paris.Google Scholar
  92. Desvaux, A. N. 1810.In J. L. A. Loiseleur-Deslongchamps, Notice sur les plantes à ajouter à la Flore de France. [cf. pp. 135–138]. Paris.Google Scholar
  93. Detharding ex Willdenow. 1809. [cf. Willdenow].Google Scholar
  94. Dixit, S. C. 1931. Some Charophyta from Salsette. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.10: 205–208, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar
  95. —. 1935. Charophytes of the Bombay Presidency. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.14(3): 257–263.Google Scholar
  96. —. 1940a. Algal investigations in the Bombay Presidency. Current Sci. (Bangalore)9(10): 453–454.Google Scholar
  97. —. 1940b. The Charophytes of the Bombay Presidency. II. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.18(4–6): 231–239, 1 pl.Google Scholar
  98. Durieu de Maisonneuve, M. C. 1846–1849. Exploration scientifique de l’Algérie. Botanique. Tom. 1. Cryptogamie. [non vidi].Google Scholar
  99. —. 1859. Note sur une nouvelle espèce du genreChara (Ch. jragijera DR.). Bull. Soc. Bot. France6: 179–186.Google Scholar
  100. - et Cosson. 1859. [cf. preceding].Google Scholar
  101. Engelmann, G. andA. Gray. 1945. [cf. Braun, A. 1845].Google Scholar
  102. Feldmann, Geneviève. 1945. Deux nouvelles espèces deChara de l’Afrique du Nord. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique du Nord37(8–9): 168–173, figs. 1, 2.Google Scholar
  103. —. 1946. Les Charophycées d’Afrique du Nord. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique Nord37: 64–118, figs. 1–20.Google Scholar
  104. Filarszky, F. [or N.]. 1893. A charafélék (Characeae L. Cl. Richard) különös tekintettel a Magyarországi Fajokra. [Die Characeen (Characeae L. Cl. Richard) mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die in Ungarn beobachteten Arten]. pp. 1–229, 5 pl. [German summary]. Budapest.Google Scholar
  105. -. 1926a. Chlorophyceae.In Ernö Csiki, Sándor Jávorka és Jenö Kümmerle. Adatok Albánia Flórajához (Additamenta ad floram Albaniae). Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Balkan-Kutatásainak Tudományos Eredményei (Budapest)3: 122–128.Google Scholar
  106. —. 1926b. Charafélék Szeged vidékén. Folia Cryptogamica1(4): 229–236. [cf. 1934a for summarization].Google Scholar
  107. —. 1926c. A magas Tátra alján termö néhány Charaféléröl. (Ueber einige Characeen am Fusse der Hohen Tátra). Magyar Botanikai Lapok 1/12: 5–14, pl. 1.Google Scholar
  108. —. 1930. A Budai Höforrások Nyélt Vizeinek Chara-Félée és néhány más érdekesebb, Ritkább Algafaja. (Die Characeen und einige andere seltenere Algen der ofener Thermalgewässer.) Matematikae és természeltudomaniji értesitö47: 652–674.Google Scholar
  109. —. 1931. Adatok Horvát-Szlavonország és a Balkán néhány más országának Chara-vegetációjához. (Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Charenvegetation Kroatien-Slavonien’s und einiger anderen Länder der Balkan-Halbinsel.) Magyar Botanikai Lapok (1931) (1/12): 86–99.Google Scholar
  110. —. 1934a. Enumeratio specierum et formarum Characearum in regionibus oppidi Szeged hucusque cognitarum et collectarum diagnosisque formarum novarum. Folia Cryptogamica1(10): 1307–1316. [summarizes earlier Hungaria work in Latin].Google Scholar
  111. —. 1934b. Die Characeen der deutschen Limnologischen Sunda-Expedition. Archiv. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 12. Tropische Binnengewässer4: 705–726, fig. 1–80.Google Scholar
  112. —. 1936. Idegenföldi charafélék határozása (Determinatio Characearum Exoticarum). Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Matematikai és Természettudományi Értesítöje55: 476–497, 8 pl.Google Scholar
  113. - etG. O. Allen ex Filarszky. 1936. [cf. Filarszky, 1936].Google Scholar
  114. - etJ. Groves. 1936. [cf. Filarszky, 1936].Google Scholar
  115. Formiggini, L. 1908a. Revisione critica della Caracee della Flora Veneta. Atti Accad. Sci. Veneto Trent.-Istri. III.1: 110–143.Google Scholar
  116. -. 1908b. Contributo alla conoscenza della Caracee della Sicilia. Bull. Soc. Bot. Ital. vol. ?: 81–86. [non vidi].Google Scholar
  117. Fries ex Aspegren. 1823. [cf. Aspegren].Google Scholar
  118. Fritisch, F. E. 1935. The structure and reproduction of the Algae. Vol. 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  119. —. 1944. The present-day classification of algae. Bot. Rev.10(4): 232–277.Google Scholar
  120. Gain, L. 1912. La flore algologique des régions antarctiques et subantarctiques. Deuxième expédition Antarctique Française (1908-1910). [not verified].Google Scholar
  121. Ganterer, U. 1847. Die bisher bekannten österreichischen Charen. Diss., Vienna. pp. 1–21, 2 pl.Google Scholar
  122. Gibbs, L. S. 1914. [cf. Groves, H., 1914].Google Scholar
  123. Gmelin, C. C. 1826. Flora Badensis Alsatica. Vol. 4: 643–647. Carlsruhe.Google Scholar
  124. Goebel, K. 1930. Die Deutung der Characeen-Antheridien. Ein Versuch. Flora124: 491–498.Google Scholar
  125. Gonçalves da Cunha, G. A. 1934. Liste des Characées du Portugal. Arq. Univ. Lisboa15: 1-?[non vidi].Google Scholar
  126. —. 1941. Additions à la flora Charologique du Portugal. Bull. Soc. Portugaise Sci. Nat.13(27): 153–156.Google Scholar
  127. —. 1942. Contribuição para o estudo des Carófitos Portugueses. Rev. Fac. C. Lisboa2: 227-? [non vidi].Google Scholar
  128. —. 1943a. Additions à la flore Charologique du Portugal. II Bull. Soc. Portugaise Sci. Nat.14: 87-? [non vidi].Google Scholar
  129. —. 1943b. Additions à la flore Charologique du Portugal. III. Bull. Soc. Portugaise Sci. Nat.14: 139–143. [non vidi].Google Scholar
  130. Gordon, M. 1943. Charales; plant benefactors of fishes. Aquarium12(7), 117–120.Google Scholar
  131. Gray, S. F. 1821. A natural arrangement of British plants. Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
  132. Griffith, W. 1849. Posthumous Papers. (Assembled by J. M. McClelland). I. Notulae ad Plantas Asiaticas. Part II. On the higher cryptogams [cf. pp. 275–283]. II. Icones Plantarum Asiaticarum. Part II. On the higher cryptogamous plants. [cf. pl. 63, 64]. Calcutta.Google Scholar
  133. Groves, H. and J. 1880. A review of the British Characeae. Jour. Bot.18: 97–103, 129–135, 161–167, pl. 207–210.Google Scholar
  134. — and J. 1881. Notes on British Characeae. Jour. Bot.19: 353–356, pl. 224.Google Scholar
  135. - in Baker. 1887. [cf. Baker].Google Scholar
  136. — and J.. 1890. Notes on the British Characeae for 1887–9. Jour. Bot.28: 65–69, pl. 296.Google Scholar
  137. — and J.. 1895. Notes on the British Characeae, 1890–1894. Jour. Bot.33: 289–92, pl. 350.Google Scholar
  138. — and J.. 1898. On the Characeae collected by Mr. T. B. Blow, F.L.S., in the West Indies. Jour. Linn Soc. [London] (Bot.)33: 323–6, pl. 19.Google Scholar
  139. -. 1906. On Characeae from the Cape Peninsula collected by Major A. H. Wolley-Dod, R.A. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)37: 285–287, pl. 11.Google Scholar
  140. -. 1911. Characeae.In Ignaz Urban, Symbolae Antillanae, seu Fundamenta Florae Indiae Occidentalis7(1): 30–44. Berolini.Google Scholar
  141. — and J.. 1912. Characeae from the Philippine Islands. Philippine Jour. Sci. C.7(2): 69–70.Google Scholar
  142. Groves, J. 1914. Characeae.In Lillian S. Gibbs, A contribution to the flora and plant formations of Mount Kinabalu and the highlands of British North Borneo. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.) 42: 1–240, pl. 1–8. [cf. pp. 16, 213].Google Scholar
  143. —. 1915. A new nitella. Jour. Bot.53: 41–43, pl. 536.Google Scholar
  144. —. 1916. On the nameLamprothamnus Braun. Jour. Bot.54: 336–337.Google Scholar
  145. —. 1919. Notes onLychnothamnus. Jour. Bot.57: 125–129.Google Scholar
  146. —. 1921. Charophyta from Annam and Guam. Philippine Jour. Sci.19: 663–664.Google Scholar
  147. -. 1922a. Charophyta.In W. H. Pearson, A systematic account of the plants collected in New Caledonia and the Isle of Pines by Mr. R. H. Compton, M.A., in 1914. Part III. Cryptogams (Hepaticae—Fungi). Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)46: 69–70, pl. 5.Google Scholar
  148. —. 1922b. On Charophyta collected by Mr. Thomas Bates Blow, F.L.S., in Ceylon. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)46: 97–103, pl. 6.Google Scholar
  149. —. 1924. Notes on Indian Charophyta. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)46: 359–376, pl. 35, 36.Google Scholar
  150. —. 1927. A new species ofNitella (Characeae) from southern Queensland. Proc. Royal Soc. Queensland38: 262.Google Scholar
  151. —. 1928. On Charophyta collected by Mr. Thomas Bates Blow, F.L.S., in Madagascar. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)48: 125–137, pl. 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. - ex Filarszky. 1936. [cf. Filarszky].Google Scholar
  153. — andG. O. Allen. 1927. On some Indian Charophyta. Jour. Bot.65: 335–339.Google Scholar
  154. —. 1935. A review of the Queensland Charophyta. Proc. Royal Soc. Queensland46: 34–59, 3 fig.Google Scholar
  155. — andG. R. Bullock-Webster. 1919. A new Nitella. Jour. Bot.55: 1, pl. 551. [Also in Irish Nat.28: 2, pl. 1].Google Scholar
  156. -and-. 1920. The British Charophyta. Vol.1. London.Google Scholar
  157. -and-. 1924a. The British Charophyta. Vol.2. London.Google Scholar
  158. —. 1924b. Notes on British Charophyta. Jour. Bot.62: 33–35, p. 570.Google Scholar
  159. — andEdith L. Stephens. 1926. New and noteworthy South African Charophyta. I. Trans. Royal Soc. So. Africa13: 145–158, pl. 12–15.Google Scholar
  160. —. 1933. New and noteworthy South African Charophyta. II. Trans. Royal Soc. So. Africa21: 271–289, pl. 13–16.Google Scholar
  161. Gulia, G. 1919. Le Caracee Maltesi. Bull. Soc. Bot. Italy.68: ? [non vidi]Google Scholar
  162. Halsted, B. D. 1879. Classification and description of the American species of Characeae. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist.20: 169–190.Google Scholar
  163. Hartman, C. J. 1843. Handbok i Skandinaviens Flora. 4th ed. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  164. Harvey, E. N. 1942. Hydrostatic pressure and temperature in relation to stimulation and cyclosis inNitella flexilis. Jour. Gen. Physiol.25(6): 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Hasslow, O. J. 1931. Sveriges Characeer. Bot. Not. (1931): 63–136.Google Scholar
  166. —. 1934. Några characeer från Amerika. Bot. Not. (1934): 346–348.Google Scholar
  167. —. 1936. Norges Characeer. Nyt Mag. Naturvidensk.75: 162–163.Google Scholar
  168. —. 1939a. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. Bot. Not. (1939): 295–301.Google Scholar
  169. —. 1939b. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. II. Bot. Not. (1939): 817–818.Google Scholar
  170. —. 1940. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. III. Bot. Not. (1940): 287–288.Google Scholar
  171. —. 1945. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. IV. Bot. Not. (1945): 121.Google Scholar
  172. Hate, V. N. 1909. Two species of “Chara” from the Bombay Island. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.19: 762–763.Google Scholar
  173. Herter, G. 1933. Estudios botanicos en la region Uruguaya. III. Florula Uruguayensis, Plantae Avasculares. Montevideo. [non vidi]Google Scholar
  174. -andG. O. Allen. 1934 [cf. Allen].Google Scholar
  175. Hertzsch, —. 1855. ZurChara filiformis Hertzsch. Hedwigia1: 81–82.Google Scholar
  176. Hill, S. E. 1941. The relation between protoplasmic streaming and the action potential inNitella andChara. Biol. Bull.81(2): 296.Google Scholar
  177. Hirn, K. E. 1900. Finska Characeer. Meddell. Soc. Fauna et Flora Fennica26: 91–99. [non vidi]Google Scholar
  178. —. 1906. Suomen Näkinpartaiset (Characeae). Luonnon Ystävä (1905): 305–326.Google Scholar
  179. Hitchcock, A. S. 1898. A list of cryptogams collected in the Bahamas, Jamaica, and Grand Cayman. Missouri Bot. Gard., Ann. Rep.9: 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Hoagland, D. R. andT. F. Broyer. 1942. Accumulation of salt and permeability in plant cells. Jour. Gen. Physiol.25(6): 865–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. — andA. R. Davies. 1929. The intake and accumulation of electrolytes by plant cells. Protoplasma6: 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Holtz, L. 1906. Ueber Characeen gesammelt in Australien und auf Sizilien. Mitth. Naturw. Verein Neuvorpommern und Rügen37: 36–43.Google Scholar
  183. Horn af Rantzien, H. 1950a. Studies in the series pluricellulatae ofNitella with special reference to American species. Meddel. från Göteborgs Bot. Trädgård18: 199–212, 17 figs.Google Scholar
  184. —. 1950b. Charophyta reported from Latin America. Arkiv för Botanik. II.1(8): 355–411.Google Scholar
  185. Howe, M. A. 1929. Two new species ofChara from tropical America. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser.,4(6): 159–161, pl. 16.Google Scholar
  186. Hy, F. 1889. [Species of Characeae found in Haute-Vienne by M. Malinvaud]. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, seance du Décembre 1889: 429.Google Scholar
  187. —. 1890a. Sur quelques Characées récoltées à la session de la Rochelle. Bull. Soc. Bot. France37: 46–50.Google Scholar
  188. —. 1890b. Sur les caractères généraux de la famille des Characées et leur importance taxonomique. Rev. Bot.8: 25–47.Google Scholar
  189. —. 1913. Les Characées de France. Soc. Bot. France., Mém.26: 1–47, pl. 1–3 [explanations for plates published in 1914].Google Scholar
  190. —. 1914. Les Characées de France, note additionnelle. Bull. Soc. Bot. France61: 235–241.Google Scholar
  191. Imahori, Kozo. 1949. Notes on the asiatic Charophyta. Bot. Magazin62: 1–4.Google Scholar
  192. Irwin, Marian. 1926. On the accumulation of dye inNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.8(2): 147–182, 12 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Itzigsohn, H. 1850. Charologisches. Bot. Zeit.8: 337–340.Google Scholar
  194. Jao, Chin-Chih. 1947a. Some Characeae from Kunming, Yunnan. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica1: 44.Google Scholar
  195. —. 1947b. Studies on the freshwater algae of China. XIV. Some freshwater algae from Kansu. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica1: 67–75.Google Scholar
  196. Josing, E. 1901. Einfluss der Aussenledingungen auf die Abhängigkeit der Protoplasmaströmung vom Licht. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.36: 197–228.Google Scholar
  197. Klein in Willdenow. [cf. Willdenow].Google Scholar
  198. Kornas, J. andA. Medwecka-Kornas. 1948. Les associations végétales sous-marines dans le golfe du Gdańsk (Baltique). Bull. Int. Acad. Polonaise Sci. et Lettres B. (1): 72–88.Google Scholar
  199. Kosanin, N. 1907. Characeen Serbiens. Oesterr. Bot. Zeits.57: 280–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Kuhn, M. 1883. [cf. Nordstedt].Google Scholar
  201. Kundu, B. C. 1932. A new species of polyarthrodactylousNitella with a review of the allied species. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.16(5): 263–268.Google Scholar
  202. —. 1937. A new Nitella from Rajshahi, Bengal. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.15: 223–226.Google Scholar
  203. —. 1941. Two new Nitellas. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.42(4): 843–846, pl. 2.Google Scholar
  204. Kützing ex Reichenbach. 1832. [cf. Reichenbach].Google Scholar
  205. Kützing, F. T. 1834. Beschreibung einiger neuen Arten der GattungChara. Flora17: 705–707.Google Scholar
  206. -. 1843. Phycologia Generaiis, oder Anatomie, Physiologie, und Systemkunde der Tange. Leipzig, [cf. pp. 313–321].Google Scholar
  207. -. 1845. Phycologia Germanica. Nordhausen, [cf. pp. 255–260].Google Scholar
  208. -. 1849. Species Algarium. Leipzig, [cf. pp. 513–526].Google Scholar
  209. —. 1857. Tabulae Phycologicae, oder Abbildungen der Tange7: 10–32, pl. 26–81. Nordhausen.Google Scholar
  210. Lakowitz, K. 1907. Die Algenflora der Danziger Bucht. Danzig. [cf. pp. 46–49].Google Scholar
  211. -. 1929. Die Algenflora der gesamten Ostsee. Danzig. [cf. pp. 193–204].Google Scholar
  212. Lam, H. J. 1934. Materials towards a study of the flora of the island of New Guinea. Blumea1(1): 115–159. [non vidi]Google Scholar
  213. Lange, J. 1856–59. Haandbog i den danske Flora. 2nd. ed. (cf. pp. 696–710). København.Google Scholar
  214. Leonhardi, H. F. von. 1863a. Ueber die böhmischen Characeen. Lotos13: 55–80, 110–111.Google Scholar
  215. —. 1863b. Weitere Characeen-Fundorte. Lotos13: 129–132, 145–148.Google Scholar
  216. —. 1864. Die bisher bekannten österreichischen Armleuchter-Gewächse besprochen von morphogenetischen Standpuncte. Verhandl. Naturf. Vereins Brünn2: 122–224.Google Scholar
  217. Lindenbein, W. 1927. Beitrag zur Zytologie der Charales. Planta4(4): 438–466, 22 fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Vol. 2. Stockholm. [cf. pp. 1156, 11547].Google Scholar
  219. Loiseleur-Deslongchamps, J. L. A. 1810. Notice sur les plantes à ajouter à la Flore de France (Flora Gallica). Paris. [cf. pp. 135–139].Google Scholar
  220. McAtee, W. L. 1939. Wildfowl food plants. Their value, propagation, and management. Ames.Google Scholar
  221. MacCaughey, V. 1918a. Algae of the Hawaiian Archipelago. I. Bot. Gaz.65: 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. —. 1918b. Algae of the Hawaiian Archipelago. II. Bot. Gaz.65: 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Marino, T. 1929. Why do not study about Japanese Characeae. Jour. Jap. Bot.6: 369–402, 29 pl. [In Japanese. Plates are duplications of T. F. Allen’s Japanese Characeae].Google Scholar
  224. Migula, W. 1890–1897. Die Characeen.In L. Rabenhorst, Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz. Vol. 5: 1–765, 149 fig. [for dates, cf. Groves and Bullock-Webster, 1924a: 111].Google Scholar
  225. —. 1904. Characeae Rossicae. Act. Hort. Petrop.23(3): 535–539.Google Scholar
  226. —. 1914. … Hedwigia55: [incl. p. 183] [fide G. O. Allen, corresp.,non vidi].Google Scholar
  227. -. 1925. Charophyta (Charales).In A. Pascher, Die Süsswasserflora Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz11: 207–250, fig. I-XIV. Jena.Google Scholar
  228. —. 1930. Ueber einige japanische Characeen. Hedwigia70: 211–215, 1 fig.Google Scholar
  229. Miquel, F. A. G. 1840.In H. C. van Hall, Flora Belgii Septentrionalis sive Florae Batavae Compendium. Vol. 2: [cf. pp. 422–433]. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  230. Morioka, Hideo. 1940.Nitella jallosa Morioka (Characeae). Iconographia Plantarum Asiae Orientalis3: 293–295, pl. 102.Google Scholar
  231. —. 1941a. Charophyta Japonica. Jour. Jap. Bot.17: 57–70, fig. 1–9.Google Scholar
  232. —. 1941b.Chara Benthamii Al. Braun. Iconographia Plantarum Asiae Orientalis4: 335–336, pl. 112.Google Scholar
  233. Müller ex Braun. 1852. [cf. Braun].Google Scholar
  234. Müller, J. 1881. Les Characées genévoises. Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève2: 42–94.Google Scholar
  235. Nordstedt, C. F. O. 1878. De algis aquae dulcis et de Characeis ex insulis Sandvicensibus a Sv. Berggren 1875 reportatis. Symb. Soc. Physiog. Lund. Vol. ?: 23–24, 1 pl.Google Scholar
  236. - in T. F. Allen. 1880. [cf. Allen, T. F.].Google Scholar
  237. —. 1880. De Algis et Characeis. 2. Characeae Novae Zeelandiae. Lunds Univ. Årsskr.16(4): 15–20.Google Scholar
  238. -. 1882. Fragmente einer Monographie der Characeen. [cf. Braun, 1882].Google Scholar
  239. -. 1883. Characeae.In M. Kuhn, Ueber Farne und Charen von der Insel Socotra. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.1(6): 238–243.Google Scholar
  240. —. 1888a. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. Hedwigia27(7 &8): 181–196, 2 pl.Google Scholar
  241. - in T. F. Allen. 1888. [cf. Allen, T. F., 1888a].Google Scholar
  242. —. 1889. De Algis et Characeis. Lunds Univ. Årsskr.25(4): 2–41.Google Scholar
  243. -. 1891. Australasian Characeae. Part L, 10 pl. Lund.Google Scholar
  244. —. 1900. Characeae. Mém. l’Herbier Boissier20: 2–3. Genève.Google Scholar
  245. —. 1918. Australasian Characeae. Proc. Royal Soc. Victoria, n. s.,31: 1–6[a synopsis to supplement plates of 1891].Google Scholar
  246. Nyman, C. F. 1884. Conspectus Florae Europaeae. Suppl. 1: 859–879, and index, pp. 882–1046. [cf. pp. 874–9].Google Scholar
  247. Olsen, S. 1944. Danish Charophyta, chorological, ecological, and Biological investigations. Kongel. Danske Vidensk. Selskab., Biol. Skrifter3: 1–240, 2 pl.Google Scholar
  248. Ophel, I. L. 1947. Notes on the generaLychnothamnus andLamprothamnium (Characeae). Trans. & Proc. Royal Soc. So. Australia71(2): 318–323, 2 fig.Google Scholar
  249. Osterhout, W. J. V. 1939. Changes of apparent ionic mobilities in protoplasm. IV. Influence of guaiacol in the effects of sodium and potassium inNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.22(3): 417–427, 6 fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. Pal, B. S. 1932. Burmese Charophyta. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)49: 47–92, pl. 8–18.Google Scholar
  251. Pascher, A. 1925. [cf. Migula, 1925].Google Scholar
  252. Petkoff, S. 1914. Les Characées de Bulgarie. Nuova Notarisia, ser. 25 (1914): 35–56. (Modena) [In Russian; transi.: Révue Acad. Bulgarie Sci. 7].Google Scholar
  253. —. 1922. La végétation des eaux de Vitocha. Ann. Univ. Sofia (1912–2),18: 1–270 [non vidi].Google Scholar
  254. Prósper, E. R. 1910. Las Carofitas de España. Madrid. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  255. Quortrup, E. R. andR. L. Sudheimer. 1942. Research note on botulism in western marsh areas with recommendations for control. Trans. North Am. Wildlife Conf.7: 284–293.Google Scholar
  256. Rafay, S. A. 1933. A survey of the flora and fauna of the water-supplies of the Madras Presidency. Indian Jour. Med. Res.20(4): 1083–1100.Google Scholar
  257. Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature; ou Tableau de l’univers et des corps organises. Palerme. [cf. p. 209].Google Scholar
  258. Reichenbach, H. G. L. 1829. Mössler’s Handbuch der Gewächskunde. ed. 2. Altona. [cf. pp. 1592–1601].Google Scholar
  259. -. 1832. Flora germanica excursoria. Vol. 1: [cf. 147–150]; 2: [cf. 843]. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  260. -. 1834. Mössler’s Handbuch der Gewächskunde. ed. 3. Altona. [cf. pp. 1662–71].Google Scholar
  261. Reinsch, P. F. 1876. Species ac genera nova algarum aquae dulcis quae sunt inventa in speciminibus in expeditione Vener. transit. hieme 1874–75 in Insula Kerguelensi a clar. Eaton collectis. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)15: 205–221. [cf. p. 219].Google Scholar
  262. Rickett, H. W. 1951. Some changes in the International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature made at Stockholm in 1950. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club78(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Robinson, C. B. 1906. The Chareae of North America. Bull. N. Y. Bot. Gard.4: 244–308.Google Scholar
  264. Salzmann ex Braun. 1835. [cf. Braun].Google Scholar
  265. Samano Bishop, Amelia. 1932.Chara tehuacanensis Samano ad interim. Anal. Inst. Biol. (Mexico)3: 233–234, 3 fig.Google Scholar
  266. Saunders, D. A. 1901. Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition. 25. The Algae. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci.3: 391–486, pl. 43–62. [cf. p. 416]Google Scholar
  267. Schaffner ex Nordstedt. 1882. [cf. Braun, 1882].Google Scholar
  268. Schleicher, J. C. 1821. Catalogus Plantarum in Helvetia ciset transalpina sponte nascentium. ed. 4. Gamberi. [cf. p. 13].Google Scholar
  269. Schur, F. 1870. Phytographische Fragmente. Oesterr. Bot. Zeit.20: 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  270. Setchell, W. A. andN. L. Gardner. 1903. Algae of northwestern America. Univ. Cal., Pub. Bot.1: 165–418, pl. 17–27. [cf. p. 233].Google Scholar
  271. Smith, G. M. 1938. Cryptogamic Botany. Vol. 1. Algae and Fungi. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  272. —. 1950. The Fresh-Water Algae of the United States. ed. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  273. Sonder, C. 1890. Die Characeen der Provinz Schleswig-Holstein und Lauenburg nebst eingeschlossenen fremden Gebietstheilen. Diss. Kiel. 63 pp.Google Scholar
  274. Soulat-Ribette, -. 1892. Famille des Characées, description et analyse des espèces et des genres observés dans les Departements de la Haute-Vienne, de la Correze, de la Crouse, de la Charente et de la Dordogne. Limoges. 40 pp.Google Scholar
  275. Spfxazzini, C. 1883. Characeae platenses. Anal. Soc. Cient. Argentina15: 218–231.Google Scholar
  276. Stroede, W. 1931. Ökologie der Characeen. Diss., Univ. of Berlin. pp. 1–119, 2 pl.Google Scholar
  277. —. 1933. Ueber die Beziehungen der Characeen zu den chemischen Faktoren der Wohngewässer und des Schlammes. Arch. Hydrobiol.25: 192–229.Google Scholar
  278. Sydow, P. 1882. Die bisher bekannten europäischen Characeen. Berlin. 104 pp.Google Scholar
  279. Teleźyński, H. 1929. Garnitures des chromosomes et synchronisme des divisions dans les filaments d’anthérozoides chez certaines espèces du genre Chara Vaill. Act. Soc. Bot. Poloniae6(3): 230–247, 2 pl.Google Scholar
  280. Teodoresco, E. C. 1907. Matériaux pour la flore algologique de la Roumanie. Ann. Sci. Nat. IX. (Bot).5: 1–155, pl. 1–7. [cf. 125–135].Google Scholar
  281. Thuillier, J. L. 1799. La Flore des Environs de Paris. (Paris) [cf. pp. 471–474].Google Scholar
  282. Trabut ex Feldman. 1946. [cf. Feldman].Google Scholar
  283. Turpin, P. E. 1817.In Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles [Paris] Vol. 18 [pl. at p. 164].Google Scholar
  284. Uechtritz, R. von. 1866. Aufzählung der Schlesischen Characeen. Jahrb. Schles. Ges. Vat. Kulture44: 88–90.Google Scholar
  285. Umrath, K. 1930. Untersuchungen über Plasma und Plasmaströmung an Characeen. IV. Potentialmessungen anNitella mucronata mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Errungserscheinung. Protoplasma9(4): 576–597, 14 fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  286. —. 1934. Der Einfluss der Temperature auf das elektrische Potential, den Aktionsstrome und die Protoplasmaströmung beiNitella mucronata. Protoplasma21(3): 329–339, 3 fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  287. Verdam, H. D. 1938. The Netherlands’ Charophyta. Blumea3: 5–33.Google Scholar
  288. Vilhelm, J. 1907. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Charophyten von Bulgarien, Montenegro,und der Athos-Halbinsel. Hedwigia47: 66–70.Google Scholar
  289. —. 1912. Zweiter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Charophytenflora von Montenegro und Bulgarien. Hedwigia53: 23–33, 3 fig.Google Scholar
  290. —. 1914. Monografická Studie o ceskych paroznatkách (Bohemian Characeen). Vštník Král. České Spol. Nauk. (1914): 1–168, 41 fig. [In Czech., with no summary].Google Scholar
  291. —. 1923a. Novae species et formae Characearum. I. Characeae bohemicae. Hedwigia64: 148–163.Google Scholar
  292. — 1923b. Nouveau Chara d’eau thermale et radioactive des bains de Pištany en Slovaquie. Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Bohême (1923): repr. p. 1–3.Google Scholar
  293. -. 1928 [?]. Characeae Europae orientalis et Asiae ex herbario instituti cryptogamici horti botanici reipublicae rossicae (ante Petropolitani). Spisy vydávané přírodovědeckou fakultou karlový university (Publ. Faculté des Sci. l’Univ. Charles) (1928?): rep. p. 1–24, 1 pl.Google Scholar
  294. —. 1930. [Additional study of the Characeae of the U.S.S.R.] Bull. Jard. Bot. Princ. URSS29(5–6): 582–596. [Russian, with French summary].Google Scholar
  295. Wahlstedt, L. J. 1862. Bidrag till kännedomen om de Skandinaviska Arterna af Vaxtfamiljen Characeae. Diss., Lund. 43 pp.Google Scholar
  296. —. 1875. Monografi öfer Sveriges och Norges Characeer. Aftryck ur Christianstads Högre Elementar-Läroverks Inbjudningskrift (1875): 1–37.Google Scholar
  297. Wallman in Zetterstedt. 1839. [cf. Zetterstedt].Google Scholar
  298. Wallman, J. 1853. Försök till en systematisk üppställning af växtfamiljen Characeae. Stockholm [also in Kongl. Vets.-Akad. Handl. (1852): 230–331. 1854].Google Scholar
  299. Wallroth, K. F. G. 1815. Annus Botanicus sive supplementum tertium ad Curtii Sprengelii Floram Halensem. Halsae. [cf. pp. 175–194, pl. I–VI].Google Scholar
  300. -. 1833. Flora Cryptogamica Germaniae. Vol. 2. Norimbergae. [cf. pp. 101–114].Google Scholar
  301. Warming, E. 1876. [cf. Zeller, C., 1876].Google Scholar
  302. Whelden, R. M. 1946. Note on Argentine Charas. Farlowia2: 305–308.Google Scholar
  303. —. 1947. A note on a Chara new to the Philippine Island. Farlowia3: 67–71.Google Scholar
  304. Willdenow, C. L. 1805a. Du genre nomméChara. Mém. Acad. Royal Berlin (1803): 79–90, pl. 1, 2.Google Scholar
  305. -. 1805b. Caroli a Linne Species Plantarum. Vol. 4. Berlin. [cf. Chara, pp. 183–7].Google Scholar
  306. —. 1809. Fünf neue Pflanzen Deutschlands. Ges. Nat. Freunde3: 296–298.Google Scholar
  307. Womersley, H. B. S. andI. L. Ophel. 1947.Protochara, a new genus of Characeae from Western Australia. Trans. & Proc. Royal Soc. So. Australia71: 311–317, 2 fig.Google Scholar
  308. Wood, R. D. 1948a. On Rafinesque’s names for the Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club75: 282–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  309. —. 1948b. Proposed dates for T. F. Allen’s exsiccatae (Characeae). Farlowia3: 327–329.Google Scholar
  310. —. 1948c. A review of the genusNitella (Characeae) of North America. Farlowia3: 331–398.Google Scholar
  311. —. 1949. Monographic studies on the Characeae. I. Emendation ofNitella Morongii Allen. Rhodora51: 13–18, pl. 1119.Google Scholar
  312. —. 1950. Stability and zonation of Characeae. Ecology31(4): 642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  313. —. 1952. An analysis of ecological factors in the occurrence of Characeae of the Woods Hole region, Massachusetts. Ecology33(1): 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  314. Zaneveld, J. S. 1939.Nitella madagascariensis, nov. spec., with notes on the Charophyta of Madagascar. Blumea3: 372–378, 1 fig.Google Scholar
  315. —. 1940. The Charophyta of Malaysia and adjacent countries. Blumea4: 1–224, 20 fig.Google Scholar
  316. —. 1942a. Some notes on Charophyta collected in the Netherlands West Indies, North Venezuela and Colombia. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.38: 141–146. [1941 ?].Google Scholar
  317. —. 1942b. An historical review of the identification of the Netherlands’ Charophyta. Blumea5: 257–267. [also inHet Nederlandsch Kruidk. Arch.,52: 114–142, 1942, in Dutch].Google Scholar
  318. Zeller, G. 1873. On Burmese Algae. Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal42: 193-? [cf. p. 193] [non vidi].Google Scholar
  319. -. 1876. Algae Brasiliensis.In E. Warming [Edit.], Symbolae ad Floram Brasiliae Centralis Cognoscendam. [cf. p. 428].Google Scholar
  320. Zetterstedt, J. W. 1839. Berättelse om en Natur-Historisk resa genom några Provinser af Nordligare Skandinavien, och särdeles Jemtland. år 1840. Kongl. Vet. Acad., Års Berättelse om Bot. Arb. (1838): 567–639. 1842. [commonly cited as “Wikstrom’s Års-ber.”]Google Scholar
  321. Ziz[iani?] ex Braun. 1834. [cf. Braun, A.].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1952

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Rhode IslandKingston

Personalised recommendations