Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1926-1967)

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 453–473 | Cite as

An organic chemist’s approach to the chemotherapy of tuberculosis

  • Vincent C. Barry
Article

Conclusion

This is a record of some individual approaches to the problem of finding an adequate chemical agent for the treatment of tuberculosis. The syntheses of the branched-chain fatty compounds which have been described was inspired by the occurrence of branched fatty acids in the lipoid fractions of mycobacteria. Although these synthetic substances show considerable promise, it is not claimed that their activity is in any way related to the occurrence of branched fatty acids in the tubercle bacillus. It seems likely, however, that more knowledge of the chemistry and biochemistry of the bacillus will furnish fresh clues to guide synthetic work on similar lines. The activityin vivo of these basic fatty substances is of especial interest, as it provides some justification for the long preoccupation of workers in this field with compounds of a fatty character.

As already described, the production of the active phenazine dyes was arrived at by a process of successive modifications of an antibiotic molecule (diploicin) which showed antituberculous activityin vitro. This is a game which anyone may play and the rules may be largely of his own devising. There can be no guarantee of success, but the probability of finding a synthetic chemotherapeutic agent for tuberculosis in this way should be no less than in a routine search for a natural antibiotic.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Doub, L. and Youmans, G. P. (1950).Amer. Rev. Tub. 61, 407.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behnisch, R., Mietzch, F. and Schmidt, H. (1950). Ibid. 61, 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernheim, F. (1941).J. Bact. 41, 387.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lehmann, J. (1946).Lancet. 250, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barry, V. C., Belton, J. G., Kelly, Rose M., and Twomey, D. (1950).Nature, 166, 303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barry, V. C., Belton, J. G., Conalty, M. L., and Twomey, D. (1948). Ibid. 162, 622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    French, F. S. (1949).Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 52, 729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wells, H. G. and Long, E. R. (1932).The Chemistry of Tuberculosis, p. 402. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson, R. and Chargaff, E. J. (1929).Biol. Chem. 85, 77; 83, 169.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanley, W. M., Coleman, G. H., Greer, C. M., Sachs, J. and Adams, R. (1932).J. Pharm. and Exp. Ther. 45, 121.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shriner, R. A., and Adams, R. J. (1925).J. A. C.S. 47, 2727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kennedy, G., Breen, J., Keane, J. and Nolan, T. J. (1937).Sci. Proc. Roy. Dub. Soc. N.S. 21, 557.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barry, V. C. and Twomey, D. (1947).Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 51B, 192.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Armstrong, W. McD.Personal communication.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spillane, P., Keane, J. and Nolan, T. J. (1936).Sci. Proc. Roy. Dub. Soc. 21, 333.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Algar, J., Nolan. T. J., McCann, E. P., Manahan, W. A. and Nolan, N. (1938). Ibid. 24, 319.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barry, V. C., and Twomey, D. (1950).Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 53B, 55.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barry, V. C., Belton, J. G., Conalty, M. L., O’Rourke, L., and Twomey, D. (1950). Ibid. 53B, 61.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greenberg, J.Personal communication.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feldman, W. H., and Hinshaw, H. C. (1943).Arch. Path. 36, 64.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Freedlander, B. L. and French, F. A. (1946).Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 63, 361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feldman, W. H., Hinshaw, H. C., and Moses, H. E. (1943). Ibid. 54, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kirkwood, S., Phillips, P. H., and McCoy, E. (1946).J. A. C.S. 68, 2405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feinstone, W. H.Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (1946). 63, 153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barry, V. C., O’Rourke, L., and Twomey, D. (1947).Nature, 160, 800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fischer, O. and Dischinger, A. (1896).Berichte, 29, 1602.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    White, H. J.Personal communication.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Albert, A. (1949).Proc. Roy. Soc. 136B, 145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1951

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent C. Barry
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Research Council LaboratoriesDublin

Personalised recommendations