Advertisement

The clinical importance of brucellosis in veterinary surgeons in private practice

  • D. G. McDevitt
Article

Summary

A survey of veterinary surgeons in ordinary (private) practice covering 97% of the total 125 was made to determine the amount of illness and to assess the extent to which this was attributable to brucellosis.

19 (15%) were already diagnosed as having brucellosis and there seemed good grounds for this. 25 (20%) were complaining of symptoms at the time of the survey of whom only 7 were already diagnosed as having brucellosis. Of the 18 cases with symptoms not already diagnosed as having brucellosis, 6 were probably suffering from another disease and 2 had negative serological tests. Most of the 17 (14%) who were probably suffering from symptomatic brucellosis, had illnesses consisting of repeated episodes resembling mild influenza.

It was found essential to interview individuals personally rather than by questionnaire to determine the precise nature of their work and the nature of their illnesses.

In spite of the fact that eradication of brucellosis from cattle in Northern Ireland has reached an advanced stage, it still seems an important source of illness amongst veterinary surgeons in private practice. The survey also revealed a high incidence of skin lesions resulting from animal midwifery which was not all related to brucellosis.

References

  1. Bartram, G. H., Bothwell, P. W., Jebb, W. H. H., McDiarmid, A. and Preston, A. E. (1963).Brucella abortus agglutinins in the sera of pregnant women and blood donors. Brit. J. prev. soc. Med. 17, 95.Google Scholar
  2. Beattie, C. P. (1938). Incidence of brucellosis clinical and latent among various groups of population. J. Hyg. (Lond.), 38, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodigan, M., McDiarmid, A., Mann, P. G. and Skone, J. G. (1961). Brucellosis—an island epidemiological study. Brit. med. J. 2, 1393.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cayton, H. R., Osborne, A. D. and Sylvester, D. G. H. (1967). Brucellosis in the community. Lancet, ii, 836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christie, T. E., Kerr, W. R. and McCaughey, W. J. (1968). Brucellosis eradication in Northern Ireland. Vet. Rec. 82, 176.Google Scholar
  6. Dalrymple-Champneys, W. W. (1960). Brucella infection and indulant fever in man. London, Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foley, B. V. and Corridan, J. P. (1968). Occupational brucellosis in County Cork. Brit. J. Industr. Med. 25, 126.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Henderson, R. J. (1967). Brucellosis in the dairy-farming community and allied workers of Worcestershire. Lancet, ii, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huddleson, I. F. and Johnson, H. W. (1930). Brucellosis. I. The significance of bruceila agglutinins in the blood of veterinarians. J. Amer. med. Ass. 94, 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kerr, W. R., Coghlan, J. D., Payne, D. J. H. and Robertson, L. (1966a). Chronic brucellosis in the practising veterinary surgeon. Vet rec. 79, 602.Google Scholar
  11. Kerr, W. R., Coghlan, J. D., Payne, D. J. H. and Robertson, L. (1966b). The laboratory diagnosis of chronic brucellosis. Lancet. ii, 1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McDevitt, D. G. and McCaughey, W. J. (1969). Brucellosis in Northern Ireland—a serological survey. J. Hyg. 67, 409.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McDevitt, D. G., (1970). The relevance of the anti-human globulin (Coombs) test and the complement-fixation test in the diagnosis of brucellosis. In press.Google Scholar
  14. Thomsen, A. (1931). Correlation of occupation with serologic reactions forBrucella abortus. J. infect. Dis. 48, 484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. White, E. G. (1960). Quoted by Bothwell P, W. (1960). Vet. Rec. 72, 933Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. McDevitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Therapeutics and PharmacologyQueen’s University of BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations