Advertisement

The uses of prospective and retrospective population surveys in the study of coronary heart disease — With a note on Ireland’s suitability for epidemiological studies

  • Risteard Mulcahy
Article

Summary

Problems in the elucidation of the causes of coronary heart disease are discussed. The author refers in detail to the prospective and retrospective epidemiological techniques. The author contends that the retrospective approach is neglected by workers in the coronary heart disease research field. The reasons for this neglect are discussed and suggestions are put forward to ensure the acceptability of the retrospective approach. Results from a comprehensive retrospective study are reported by the author and compared with results from prospective studies. A special note is made of Ireland’s suitability for epidemiological studies.

References

  1. 1.
    Dawber, T. R. and Kannel, W. B. (1962). “Atherosclerosis and you: Atherogenetic implication from Epidemiologic Observation.”Jr. Amer. Ger. Soc., 10, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dawber, T. R., Kannel, W. B. and Lyell, L. P. (1963). “An approach to longitudinal studies in a community: The Framingham Study.”Ann. New York Acad. of Scs., 107, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deegan, K. and Hayward, P. J. (1965). “Serum Lipid Changes following myocardial infarction.”Je. Ath. Res., Vol. 5, No. 3, 265.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doll, R. and Hill, A. B. (1964). “Mortality in relation to smoking: Ten years observation of British doctors.”Brit. Med. Jr., 1, 1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doyle, J. T., Dawber, T. R., Kannel, W. B., Kinsh, S. H. and Kahn, H. A. (1964), “Relationship of cigarette smoking to Coronary Heart Disease.”J.A.M.A., 190, 886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Epstein, F. N., Ostrander, L. D., Johnson, J. B. and Francis, T. (1965). “Epidemiological studies of Coronary Heart Disease in a Total Community—Tecumseh, Michigan.”Ann. Intern. Med., 62, 1170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frank, C. W., Weinblatt, E., Shapiro, S. and Sager, R. V. (1966). “Physical inactivity as a lethal factor in Myocardial Infarction among men.”Circulation, 34, 1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keen, H., Rose, G., Pyke, D. A., Boyns, D., Chlouverakis, C. and Mistry, S. (1965). “Blood Sugar and Arterial Disease.”Lancet, 2, 505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paul, O. (1967). “Value of Prospective Studies.”Proc. Royal Soc. Med., 60, 53.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reid, D. D. (1967). “Value of Prospective Studies.”Proc. Royal Soc. Med., 60, 53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shapiro, S., Weinblatte, E., Frank, C. W. and Sager, R. V. (1965). “The H.I.P. Study of Incidence and Prognosis of CHD: Preliminary findings on incidence of myocardial infarction and angina.”Jr. Chron. Dis., 18, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sowton, E. (1962). “Cardiac Infarction and the Glucose Tolerance Test.”Brit. Med. Jr., 1, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Risteard Mulcahy
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiac DepartmentSt. Vincent’s HospitalDublin

Personalised recommendations