Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science

, Volume 157, Issue 1, pp 5–7 | Cite as

Trisomy 18: A nine year review

  • A. Bergin
  • S. P. McManus
  • T. A. Clarke
  • M. Moloney
Article

Summary

A RETROSPECTIVE study confirmed the incidence of Edward’s Syndrome to be 1 in 3349-considerably higher than reported in most comparable studies. Median survival of the liveborn infants was four days, with a mean of 17 days, and a range of one hour to ten weeks. Fifty per cent of all liveborn babies with this potentially lethal genetic condition were delivered by caesarean section. The role that prenatal foetal assessment, including foetal karyotyping, might play in identifying such affected foetuses and determining their method of delivery is discussed. This is particularly important in view of the fact that a considerable proportion of the mothers of offspring with this condition are of advanced maternal age and high parity.

Keywords

Caesarean Section Caesarean Section Rate Polyhydramnios Lower Segment Caesarean Section Affected Foetus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Edward, J. H., Harnden, D. G., Cameron, A. H., Crosse, V. M., Wolff, O. H. A new trisomic syndrome. 1960: Lancet i, 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nielsen, J., Holm, V., Haar, J. Prevalence of Edward’s Syndrome. Clustering or seasonal variation? Humangentik. 1975: 26, 113–116.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conen, P., Erkman, B. Frequency and occurrence of chromosomal syndromes. II. E.Trisomy. Am. J. Hum. Gen. 1966: 18, 387.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, P. E., Pearn, J. H., Bell, J., Martin, N., Anderson, N. G. Survival in trisomy 18. Clin. Gen. 1985: 27, 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber, W. W. Survival and the sex ratio in trisomy 17–18. Am. J. Hum. Gen. 1967: 19, 369–77.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hodes, M. E., Cole, J., Palmer, C. G., Reed, T. Clinical experience with Trisomies 18 and 13. J. Med. Gen. 1978: 15, 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Young, I. D., Cook, J. P., Mehta, L. Changing demography of trisomy 18. Arch. Dis. Child. 1896: 61, 1035–1036.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    David, T. J., Glew, S. Morbidity of trisomy 18 includes delivery by caesarean section. Lancet 1980: 11, 1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schneider, A. S., Mennuti, M., Zackai, T. High caesarean section rate in trisomy 18 births: A potential indication for late prenatal diagnosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gyn. 1981: 140, 367–370.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor, A. I. Autosomal trisomy syndromes, a detailed study of 27 cases of Edward’s Syndrome and 27 cases of Patau’s Syndrome. J. Med. Gen. 1968: 5, 227–252.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, D. W. Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation (Major Problems in Clinical Paediatrics, Vol 7). W. B. Saunders Company. 1982: 14–17.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Grouchy, J. and Turleau, C. Autosomal Disorders. Emery, A. E., Rimoin, D. L., eds., Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne and New York. Churchill Livingstone. 1983: 170–192.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, A., Slink, M., Ruxton, T. Trisomy 18 in an 11 year old child. J. Ment. Defic. Res. 1978: 22, 277–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williamson, R. A., Weiner, C. P., Patil, S., Benda, J., Varner, M., Abu-Pousef, M. Abnormal pregnancy sonogram: Selective indication for fetal karyotype. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987: 69, 15–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bergin
    • 1
  • S. P. McManus
    • 1
  • T. A. Clarke
    • 1
  • M. Moloney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PaediatricsRotunda HospitalDublin 1

Personalised recommendations