Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 42–56 | Cite as

Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as a first step

  • Lisa Daniels


DESPITE THE PUSH for more technology, the majority of professors have not introduced technology into the classroom. For some, reluctance reflects the lack of recognition for the time spent developing technology-intensive courses and the pressing need to publish. Desktop Presentation Programs (DPPs), such as PowerPoint, offer an introductory first step. With minimal financial and economic costs, DPPs have the advantage of including visual appeal, organized notes, animated graphics, more class time for interactive activities, up-to-date information through links to the World-Wide Web (Web), and the ability to address various learning styles.

Based on a comparison of classes taught with and without DPP materials, this paper addresses the benefits and costs, student achievement, and student reaction to multimedia presentations. The results showed no significant change in student performance with DPP materials, however, learning styles do affect student performance. Student reaction to DPP materials was overwhelmingly positive.


PowerPoint learning styles student performance benefits costs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borg, M.O. & Stranahan, H. (1998). The effect of gender and race on student performance in principles of economics: The importance of personality type. Paper presented at the 1998 Western Economics Association Meetings, June 29 to July 3, Lake Tahoe, Nevada.Google Scholar
  2. Dominianni, C. (1997, August). Head to head: Presentation programs.Windows Magazine.pp. 141–43.Google Scholar
  3. Keirsey, D. & Bates, M. (1984).Please understand me: Character and temperament types.5th ed. Del Mar, CA:Prometheus Nemesis.Google Scholar
  4. Lawrence, G. (1993).People types & tiger stripes.Gainesville, FL:Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc. Google Scholar
  5. Myers, I.B. & McCaulley, M.H. (1985).Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. Google Scholar
  6. Poor, A. (1997). Lighter and brighter portable projectors.PC Magazine,16 (14), pp. 249–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Daniels
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWashington CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations