Advertisement

Mycotoxin Research

, Volume 18, Supplement 1, pp 20–23 | Cite as

Evaluation of glucomannan for its adsorbing ability of Aflatoxin B1 and T-2 Toxin in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Broiler Chickens

  • T. N. K. Murthy
  • B. N. Reddy
  • G. Devegowda
Article

Abstract

A biological experiment was conducted to evaluate the ability of glucomannan to adsorb aflatoxin B1(AFB1 and T-2 toxin in gut conditions of broiler chickens. Glucomannan (GM) was tested at 0.1 percent (1kg / ton) on a total of two hundred uniformly weighing five-week-old commercial broiler birds, which were randomly assigned to one of the ten dietary treatments with four replicates each. Four birds were sacrificed at 30 minutes intervals i.e., 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes from each treatment, and the gut contents were collected. The toxin concentrations in the dried gut samples were estimated and percent of AFB1 and T-2 toxin recovered was measured. Thein vivo results revealed that glucomannan had the ability to adsorb Aflatoxin upto 75–90% and T-2 toxin upto 30–35% in gastrointestinal tract of broilers.

Keywords

Aflatoxin B1 T-2 toxin Glucomannan Commercial broiler 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References:

  1. [1]
    Jelinek CF, Pohland AE, Wood GE 1989. World wide occurrence of mycotoxins in foods and feeds-an update. J. AOAC. 72: 223–23.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Kubena, LF, Harvey, RB, Huff WE, Corrier DE, Phillips TD, Rottinghaus GE 1990. Efficacy of hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate to reduce the toxicity of aflatoxin and T-2 toxin. Poultry. Sci, 69: 1078–1086.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Devegowda G 2002. Mycotoxins: Economic risks and their Control. In: Handbook of Poultry Nutrition, Published by American soybean association.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chestnut AB, Anderson PD, Cochran MA, Fribourg HA., Twinn KD 1992. Effects of Hydrated Sodium Calcium Aluminosilicate on Fescue Toxicosis and Mineral Absorption. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 2838–2846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kubena LF, Harvey RB, Bailey RH, Buckley SA, Rottinghaus GE 1998. Effect of a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (T-bind) on mycotoxicosis in young broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 77: 1502–1504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Devegowda G, Raju MVLN, Swamy HVLN 1998a. Mycotoxins: Novel solution for their counteraction, Feed Stuffs. 70: 12–15.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Trenholm HL, Prelusky DB, Young JC, Miller JD 1988. Reducing mycotoxins in animal feeds. Agriculture Canada Publication 1827 E.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Devegowda G, Raju MVLN, Afzali N, Swamy HVLN 1998b. Mycotoxin picture world wide: Novel solutions for their counteraction. Feed Compounder. 18: 22–27.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Raju MVLN, Devegowda G 2002. Esterified-glucomannan in broiler chicken diets-contaminated with Aflatoxin, Ochratoxin and T-2 toxin: Evaluation of its binding ability (in vitro) and efficacy as immunomodulator. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2002 15: 1051–1056.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shotwell OL, Hesseltine CW, Stubblefield RD, Sorenson WG 1966. Production of aflatoxin on rice. Appl. Microbiol. 14: 425–428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Romer T 1975. Qualitative/quantitative analysis for detection and estimation of aflatoxin B1. J. AOAC 58: 500–506.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Mycotoxin Research and Springer 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. N. K. Murthy
    • 1
  • B. N. Reddy
    • 1
  • G. Devegowda
    • 1
  1. 1.Research AssociatesCollege of Veterinary SciencesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations