Comparisons of predicted and measured results on performance and emission of engine effected by intake air dilution and supercharging
- 103 Downloads
An experimental study was conducted on a single cylinder direct injection diesel engine to investigate the effects of diluting intake air, with different gases and increasing intake pressure on combustion process and exhaust emissions. The intake O2 concentration is changed from 15% to 21% by diluting intake air with different gases (CO2, Ar, N2), and the intake pressure is changed from one to two bar by a screw compressor. A modified program for calculating heat release rate, is used to study the characteristics of combustion and exhaust emissions in detail. The main results show that the addition of either CO2 or Ar to the intake air increases the ignition delay. The variations of ignition delay with CO2 are much larger than those of ignition delay with Ar for the same O2 concentration. The emission of NOx decreases with the decrease of O2 concentration and the smoke level is lower with the addition of the CO2 than with that of Ar. As the intake pressure is increased, the ignition delay is shortened. Furthermore the high intake air pressure enhances the air-fuel mixing and diffusion combustion, and reduces the premixed combustion, so that NOx emission is decreased without increasing smoke emissions. The addition of CO2 at high intake pressure, drastically reduces NOx emissions and smoke emission simultaneously at a high load condition, and the addition of CO2 reduces NOx emissions without affecting the smoke emissions substantially at a low load condition. A zero-dimensional combustion simulation program incorporated with the present heat release correlation and ignition delay correlation is used to predict ignition delay, cylinder pressure and engine power. The results show that the correlations are likely to be adequate for the engine operating under diluted intake air and various intake pressure.
Key WordsIntake Gas Composition Supercharging Intake Pressure Exhaust Gas Recycling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arcoumanis C., Bae C., Nagwaney A., and Whitelaw J. H. 1995, “Effect of EGR on Combustion Development in a 1.9L DI Optical Engine,”SAE 950850.Google Scholar
- Asada T., and Nagai M. 1980, “Investigation on Recycle and Closed-cycle Diesel Engine,”SAE 800964.Google Scholar
- Hawley J. G., Reader G. T. 1994, “Experimental Performance Results from a Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen Breathing Diesel Engine,”SAE 941699.Google Scholar
- Heywood J. B. 1988,Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, Mcgraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Miyamoto N., and et al. 1985, “Discription and Analysis of Diesel Engine Rate of Combustion and Performance Using Wiebe’s Function,”SAE 850107.Google Scholar
- Uchida N., Daisho Y., and et al. 1993, “Combined Effects of EGR and Supercharging on Diesel Combustion and Emissions,”SAE 930601.Google Scholar
- Watson, N., and Kame, 1979, “Thermodynamic Efficiency Evaluation of an Indirect Injection Diesel Engine,”SAE 790039.Google Scholar
- Wiebe J. J. 1960, “Brenngesitz, ein Fortschnitt in der Thermodynamik der Kreigspozesse von Verbrennungsmotoren,” Kraftadrzeng technik, Vol.Google Scholar
- Yu R. C., Shahed S. M. 1981, “Effects of Injection Timing and Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Emissions from a D. I. Diesel Engine,”SAE 811234.Google Scholar
- Zeng M. and Reader G. T. 1995, “Preliminary Investigation of Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in a Nonair-Breathing Diesel Engine,”Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 117.Google Scholar