Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science

, Volume 162, Issue 6, pp 218–220 | Cite as

Current alternatives to open cholecystectomy in the management of gallstones

  • A. L. Leahy
Article

Conclusions

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the principal treatment of symptomatic gallstones, however its safety will need to be carefully monitored. Newer technologies have been used to perform cholecystolithotomy safely in high risk patients. Other treatments such as ESWL and medical therapy must be still considered experimental, however they are likely to become applicable in the future. Chemical cholecystectomy is experimentally feasible and therefore requires to be evaluated in further studies.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Cystic Duct Shockwave Lithotripsy Bile Duct Injury Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Haeger, K. The illustrated history of surgery. AB Nordbock, Gothenburg, 1989; 225–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McSherry C. K. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am. J. Surg. 1989; 158,174–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates, T., Mercer, J. C., Harrison, M. Symptomatic gallstone disease before and after cholecystectomy GUT 1984; 24, A579–80.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheslyn-Curtis, S., Russell, R. C. G. New trends in gallstone management. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78,143–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Danzinger R. G., Hofmann, A. F., Schoenfield, L. J. Dissolution of cholesterol gallstones by chenodeoxycholic acid. N. Engl. J. Med. 1972; 286,1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fromm, H. Gallstone dissolution therapy: current status and future prospects. Gastroenterology 1986; 91, 1560–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Donnell, L. D., Heaton, K. W. Recurrence and re-recurrence of gallstones after medical dissolution: a long-term follow-up. GUT 1988; 29, 655–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sauerbrugh T., Delius, M., Paumgartner, G. Fragmentation of gallstones by extracorporeal shock waves. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986; 314, 818–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sackman, M., Delius, M., Sauerbruch, T. et al. Shock-wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. The first 175 patients. N. Engl. J. Med, 1988; 318–393–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darzi, A., Monson, J. R. T., O’Morain, C. et al. Extension of selection criteria for extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy. Br. Med. J. 1989; 299, 302–3.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darzi, A., Feeley, M., Leahy, A. L. et al. Symptomatology of patients post-gallstone clearance. Gut 1989; 30, A1508.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Darzi, A., O’Morain, C., Leahy, A. L. et al. Extended criteria for lithotripsy? Gastroenterology 1989; 96, A111.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Darzi, A., Leahy, A. L., O’Morain, C. et al. Gallstone clearance: a randomised study of extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy and chemical dissolution. Br. J. Surg. 1990; 77, 1265–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thistle, J. L., May, G. R., Bender, C. E. et al. Dissolution of cholesterol gallbladder stones by methyl tert-butyl ether administered by percutaneous transhepatic catheter. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989; 320, 633–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    Darzi, A., McCollum, P., Leahy, A. L. et al. Recurrence of gallstones following successful gallstone lithotripsy. Br. J. Surg. (in press).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Kellett, M. J.,Wickham, J.E.A., Russell, R.C.G. Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy. Br. Med. J. Clin. Res. 1988; 296, 453–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    Joyce, W. P., Keane, R., Burke, G.J. et al. Identification of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br.J.Surg. 1991; 10,1174–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    von Sonnenberg, E., Wing V. W., Pollard, J. W. L. et al. Life-threatening vagal reactions associated with percutaneous cholecystectomy. Radioloogy 1984; 151, 377–380.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    Leahy, A. L., Darzi, A. W., Murchan, P. M. et al. A safe new procedure for high-risk patients with symptomatic gallstones. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78,1319–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 18.
    Dubois, F., Icard, P., Vertholot, G, Levard H. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg. 1990; 211, 60–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 19.
    Reddick, E. J., Olsen, D.O. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 1989; 3,131–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 20.
    Grace, P. A., Bouchier-Hayes, D. J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the implications for surgical practices and training. J. Ir. Coll. Phys. & Surg. 1990; 19,180–1.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Grace, P., Qureshi, A., Darzi, A. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a hundred consecutive cases. Ir. Med. J. 1991; 84,12–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    Leahy, A. L., Hayes, D. B., Hyland, J. M. et al. Early experiences of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in five Irish hospitals. Ir. J. Med. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    Paterson-Brown, S., Garden, O. J., Carter, D. C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 131-132.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    The Southern Surgeons ’ Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991; 1073–8.Google Scholar
  27. 25.
    Cameron, J. L., Gadacz, T. R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg. 1991; 213,1–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 26.
    Qureshi, A., Brindley, N., Leahy, A. L. et al. Routine cholangiography is unnecessary for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1992; 72,510.Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    Bailey, R. W., Zucker, K. A., Flowers, J. L. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann. Surg. 1991; 214, 531–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 28.
    Berci, G., Sackier, J., Phillips, B. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Anomalies and bile duct injuries. World Congress of Surg. Stockholm, 1991; 142.Google Scholar
  31. 29.
    Hunter, J.G. Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991; 162, 71–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 30.
    Leahy, A. L. A decade of change in the management of gallstones. XIIth Terence Millin Memorial Lecture; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Nov. 1991.Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    Wilson, R.G., Macintyre, I.M.C., Nixon, S.J., Saunders, J. H., Varma, J. S., King, P. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis. Br. Med. J. 1992; 305,393–4.Google Scholar
  34. 32.
    Grace, P. A., Leahy, A. L., McEntee, G., Bouchier-Hayes, D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the scarred abdomen. Surg. Endosc. 1991; 5,118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 33.
    Getrajdman, G., O’Toole, K., Logerfo, P. et al. Transcatheter sclerosis of the gallbladder in rabbits. Invest. Radiol. 1985; 20, 393–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 34.
    Salomanowitz, E., Frick, M. P., Simmons, R. L. Obliteration of the gallbladder without formal cholecystectomy. A feasibility study. Arch. Surg. 1984; 119, 725–9.Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    Leahy, A. L., McCollum, P. T., O’Gorman, S. et al. Cystic duct obliteration and gall bladder mucosal destruction: a feasible alternative to cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78, 1321–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. Leahy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont HospitalDublin 9

Personalised recommendations