Advertisement

KSME Journal

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 22–27 | Cite as

Accuracy improvement technique for measuring stress intensity factors in photoelastic experiment

  • Tae-Hyun Baek
  • Christian P. Burger
Article

Abstract

Fracture coefficients, together with the exact origin of the crack, were extracted from data sets produced an overdeterministic system solved by an iterative least squares method. Power series type williams equations were used in the analyses. The accuracy evaluation indicated that the first four terms of williams equations are sufficient to describe the stress field in the vicinity of the crack tip for both mode I and mixed mode cases. Experimental study showed that the first two terms of williams equations, which are the same as the modified westergaard equations, cannot be used to extract mixed mode fracture parameters accurately within the data collection region of 0.07 <r/a <0.30, where r and a are radial coordinate and crack length for an edge crack, respectively.

Key Words

Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) Crack Tip Analysis Photoelastic Experiment Williams Equations Mixed Mode Fracture Parameter Fracture Mechanics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baek, T.H., Koerner, B.H. and Burger, C.P., 1988, “A Digital Procedure for Photoelastic Fsinge Sharpening,” Proceeding of the VI International Congress on Experimental Mechanics, Vol. II, pp. 925–930.Google Scholar
  2. Baek, T.H., 1986, “Study of Mixed Stress Intensity Factors by Two-and Three-Dimensional Photoelasticity,” Ph. D. Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, W.B. and Kobayashi, A.S., 1970, “An-investigation of Propagating Cracks by Dynamic Photoelasticity,” Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Irwin, G.R., 1958, “Discussions of Analysis of Stress and Strains Near the end of a Crack Traversing a Plate,” Proceedings of Society for Experimental Stress Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 93–96.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, L.W. and Riess, D.R., 1982, “Numerical Analysis,” 2nd Edition, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, pp. 174–180.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Murthy, N. S. and Rao, P. R., 1984, “Photoelastic Determination of Mode I stress Intensity Factors in Tensile Strips: Effects of Crack Length,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 475–478.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Post, D., 1954, “Photoelastic Stress Analysis for an Edge Crack in a Tensile Stress Field,” Proceedings of Society for Experimental Stress Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 99–116.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Sanford, R. J. and Dally, J. W., 1979, “A General Method for Determining Mixed Mode Stress Intensity Factors from Isochromatic Fringe Patterns,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sanford, R. J., 1980, “Application of the Least Squares Method to the Photoelastic Analysis,” Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, C.W., 1980, “Photoelasticity in Fracture Mechanics,” Vol. 20, No. 11, pp. 390–396.Google Scholar
  11. Theocaris P. S., 1972, “Interactions of Cracks with Other Cracks or Boundaries,” Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 37–47.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Williams, M. L., 1957, “On the Stress Distribution at the Base of a Stationary Crack,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 24, pp. 109–114.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (KSME) 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tae-Hyun Baek
    • 1
  • Christian P. Burger
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical DesignKunsan National UniversityChonbukKorea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations