Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bile duct injuries in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Apples and oranges

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Bile duct injuries are potentially devastating for the patient and the surgeon. Most bile duct injuries probably occur during the initial 12-15 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy done by any one surgeon(8,15). It is imperative therefore that surgeons in training or who are new to this technique are adequately supervised during this period. There seems to be an increased incidence of bile duct injury with the laparoscopic technique (0.6% compared with 0.2%). Laparoscopic bile duct injuries however, may be more common but less serious compared with the open approach. A high proportion of laparoscopic injuries are injures in continuity, which may be managed without recourse to laparotomy. The incidence of severe injury requiring a hepaticoenterostomy does not seem to have increased, though as yet we cannot comment on the incidence of late duct strictures from the laparoscopic approach. Laser and diathermy injuries are also more common with the laparoscopic procedure and the high reported incidence of bile leaks must be carefully analysed.

It has been suggested that large scale audit is more likely to reflect the true incidence of bile duct injury due to under-reporting of a relatively uncommon problem in published series(43). Analysis of bile duct injuries should therefore take into account different rates in reported and audit series, bile leaks, probable increased primary diagnosis at the original laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the learning curve as well as new mechanisms of diathermy or laser injury. With comparative analysis and experience the long term incidence of bile duct injuries may be similar to that after the open procedure, and indeed may even be less in some centres(50).

The mechanisms and gravity of biliary injuries may therefore differ with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and it is not surprising that approaches to treatment may differ also. It is not necessary to adopt the traditional common surgical approach with bilio-enteric anastomosis for all bile duct injuries occurring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This emphasises the importance of a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation and management of bile duct injuries. As previously, it is advisable to refer these patients to a unit with a special interest in the management of bile duct injuries where, together with surgery, there should be access to endoscopy and interventional radiology with the whole range of percutaneous and endoscopic stents and balloon dilatation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Couse, N. F., Delaney, C. P., Gorey, T. F. Evolving management of biliary tract disease. Nyhus Lloyd, M. (Ed), Surgery Annual, Part II Ch. 11, Appleton and Lange, Chicago, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muhe, E. Die erste Cholezystektomie durch das Laparoskop (abst). Arch Klin. Chir. 1986: 369; 804.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reddick., E.J., Olsen, D. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: a comparison with minilap cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc. 1989: 3; 131–133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kent, P., Kerin, M. J., Wood, A. E., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Gorey, T. F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cardiac transplant patients - lower threshold for surgery? Min. Invas. Ther. 1993: 2; 181–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron, J. L., Gayler, B. W., Zuidema, G. D. The use of silastic transhepatic stents in benign and malignant biliary strictures. Ann Surg. 1978: 188; 552–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters, J. H., Ellison, E. C, Innes, J. J. et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg. 1991: 213; 3–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheslyn-Curtis, S., Emberton, M., Ahmed, H., Williamson, R. C. N, Habib, N. A. Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br. J. Surg. 1992: 79: 231–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidoff, A. M., Pappas, T. N., Murray, E. A. et al. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992: 215; 196–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moossa, A. R., Mayer, A. D., Stabile, B. Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct - who, how, where? Arch Surg. 1990: 125; 1028–1030.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moossa, A. R., Easter, D. W., Van Sonneneberg, E., Casona, G., D’Agostino, H. Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct - a cause for concern. Ann Surg. 1992: 215; 203–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozarek, R., Gannon, R., Baerg, R., Wagonfeld, J., Bull, T. Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of ERCP. Arch Intern. Med. 1992: 152: 1040–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, A. T., Shapiro, A. W., Brooks, D. C., Braver, J. M., Jumeh, S. S. Bile duct disruption and biloma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: imaging evaluation. A J R, 1992, 158: 785–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cronin, K., Kerin, J. M., Williams, N. N., MacMathuna, P., Crowe, J., Lennon, J., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Gorey, T. F. Endoscopic management of common duct stones with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Irish J. Med. Science 1991: 160; 263–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, I. G., Holdsworth, P. J., Asker, J. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a routine procedure for gallstones: results of an all-comers policy. Br. J. Surg. 1992: 79; 807–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reddick, E. J., Olsen, D., Spaw, A. et al. Safe performance of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 372–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Voyles, C. R., Petro, A. B., Meenan, A. L., Haick, A. J., Koury, A. M. A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 36–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deziel, D. J., Millikan, K. W., Diran, M. C, Ko, S. T., Doolas, A. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey of 4292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604 patients. Am. J. Surg. 1993: 165; 9–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schirmer, B. D., Edge, S. B., Dix, J., Hyser, M. J., Hanks, J. B., Jones, R. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; treatment of choice for symptomtic gallstones. Ann Surg. 1991: 213; 665–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Flowers, J. L., Zucker, Ka., Graham, S. M., Scovill, W. A., Imbembo, A. I., Bailey, R. W. Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg. 1992: 215; 209–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991: 324; 1075.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Graves, H.A., Bakkubger, J.F., Allderson, W. J. Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991: 213; 655–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cuschieri, A., Dubois, F., Mouiel, J. et al. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991, 161: 385–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zucker, K. A., Bailey, R. W., Gadacz, T. R., Imbembo, A. L. Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 36–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berci, G., Sackier, J. M. The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 382–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Herschmann, M. J., Rosin, R. D. Laser laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our first 50 patients. Gut 1991: 32; A 1252.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, P., Leese, T., Morgan, W. P. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital. Lancet 1991: 338; 795–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McKernan, J. B. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. Surg. 1991; 57: 311–312.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Neugebauer, E., Troidl, H., Spangenberger, W., Dietrich, A., Lefering, R. The cholecystectomy study group. Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 150–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Goodman, G. R., Hunter, J. G. Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university teaching hospital. Am. J. Surg. 1991; 162: 576–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Larson, G. M., Vitale, G. C., Casey, J. et al. Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1983 patients. Am. J. Surg. 1992; 163: 221–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Soper, N. J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - the new gold standard. Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 917–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis, C., Arregani, M., Nagan, R. F. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the St. Vincent experience. Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy 1992: 2: 64–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Graffis, R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Methodist hospital experience. Surgical laparoscopy and endoscopy 1992; 2: 69–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnston, G. W. Iatrogenic bile duct stricture: an avoidable surgical hazard. Br. J. Surg. 1986: 73; 245–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Collins, P. G., Gorey, T. F. Iatrogenic biliary stricture: Presentation and management. Br. J. Surg. 1984: 71; 980–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Blumgart, L. H., Kelley, C. J., Benjamin, I. S. Benign bile duct stricture following cholecystectomy: Critical factors in management. Br. J. Surg. 1984: 71; 836–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pitt, H. A., Miyamato, T., Parapais, S., Tompkins, R. K., Longmire, W. P. Factors influencing outcome in patient with postoperative biliary strictures. Am. J. Surg. 1982: 144; 14–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hunter, J. G. Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kerin, M. J., Williams, N. N., Cronin, K., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Gorey, T. F. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Irish J. Med. Science 1992: 161; 1–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Petelin, J. B. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg. Laparosc. Enclose. 1991:1; 33–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Quattlebaum, J. K., Flanders, H. D. Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. Surg. Laparoscopy Endoscopy 1991: 1; 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stoker, M. E., Leveillee, M. D., McCann, J. C, Maini, B. S. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J. Laparoendoscopic. Surg. 1991: 1; 287–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. MacIntyre, I. M. C., Wilson, R. G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1993: 80; 552–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Thistle, J. L., May, G. R., Bender, C. E. et al. Dissolution of cholesterol gallbladder stones by methyl ter butyl ether administered by percutaneous transhepatic catheter. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989: 320; 633–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Keating, J. P., Schroeder, D. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: our first 200 patients. Ann R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1993: 75: 67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dubois, F., Icard, P., Berthelot, G., Levard, H. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg. 1990; 211: 60–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gadacz, T. R., Talamini, M. A. Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 336–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. McSherry, C. K. Cholecystectomy - the gold standard. Am. J. Surg. 1989: 158; 174–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gorey, T. F., Drumm, J., Collins, P. Haemobilia associated with a post-operative biliary stricture, HPB Surgery 1989: 1; 228–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Raute, M., Podlech, P., Jaschke, W., Manegold, B. C., Trede, M. Management of bile duct injuries and structures following cholecystectomy. World J. Surg. 1993: 17; 553–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mater Hospital, Dublin 7

    Thomas F. Gorey & Michael J. Kerin

Authors
  1. Thomas F. Gorey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Kerin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorey, T.F., Kerin, M.J. Bile duct injuries in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Apples and oranges. I.J.M.S. 163, 1–3 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943003

Search

Navigation