Irish Journal of Medical Science

, Volume 163, Issue 1, pp 1–3 | Cite as

Bile duct injuries in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Apples and oranges

  • Thomas F. Gorey
  • Michael J. Kerin


Bile duct injuries are potentially devastating for the patient and the surgeon. Most bile duct injuries probably occur during the initial 12-15 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy done by any one surgeon(8,15). It is imperative therefore that surgeons in training or who are new to this technique are adequately supervised during this period. There seems to be an increased incidence of bile duct injury with the laparoscopic technique (0.6% compared with 0.2%). Laparoscopic bile duct injuries however, may be more common but less serious compared with the open approach. A high proportion of laparoscopic injuries are injures in continuity, which may be managed without recourse to laparotomy. The incidence of severe injury requiring a hepaticoenterostomy does not seem to have increased, though as yet we cannot comment on the incidence of late duct strictures from the laparoscopic approach. Laser and diathermy injuries are also more common with the laparoscopic procedure and the high reported incidence of bile leaks must be carefully analysed.

It has been suggested that large scale audit is more likely to reflect the true incidence of bile duct injury due to under-reporting of a relatively uncommon problem in published series(43). Analysis of bile duct injuries should therefore take into account different rates in reported and audit series, bile leaks, probable increased primary diagnosis at the original laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the learning curve as well as new mechanisms of diathermy or laser injury. With comparative analysis and experience the long term incidence of bile duct injuries may be similar to that after the open procedure, and indeed may even be less in some centres(50).

The mechanisms and gravity of biliary injuries may therefore differ with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and it is not surprising that approaches to treatment may differ also. It is not necessary to adopt the traditional common surgical approach with bilio-enteric anastomosis for all bile duct injuries occurring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This emphasises the importance of a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation and management of bile duct injuries. As previously, it is advisable to refer these patients to a unit with a special interest in the management of bile duct injuries where, together with surgery, there should be access to endoscopy and interventional radiology with the whole range of percutaneous and endoscopic stents and balloon dilatation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Couse, N. F., Delaney, C. P., Gorey, T. F. Evolving management of biliary tract disease. Nyhus Lloyd, M. (Ed), Surgery Annual, Part II Ch. 11, Appleton and Lange, Chicago, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muhe, E. Die erste Cholezystektomie durch das Laparoskop (abst). Arch Klin. Chir. 1986: 369; 804.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reddick., E.J., Olsen, D. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: a comparison with minilap cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc. 1989: 3; 131–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kent, P., Kerin, M. J., Wood, A. E., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Gorey, T. F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cardiac transplant patients - lower threshold for surgery? Min. Invas. Ther. 1993: 2; 181–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cameron, J. L., Gayler, B. W., Zuidema, G. D. The use of silastic transhepatic stents in benign and malignant biliary strictures. Ann Surg. 1978: 188; 552–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peters, J. H., Ellison, E. C, Innes, J. J. et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg. 1991: 213; 3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheslyn-Curtis, S., Emberton, M., Ahmed, H., Williamson, R. C. N, Habib, N. A. Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br. J. Surg. 1992: 79: 231–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davidoff, A. M., Pappas, T. N., Murray, E. A. et al. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992: 215; 196–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moossa, A. R., Mayer, A. D., Stabile, B. Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct - who, how, where? Arch Surg. 1990: 125; 1028–1030.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moossa, A. R., Easter, D. W., Van Sonneneberg, E., Casona, G., D’Agostino, H. Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct - a cause for concern. Ann Surg. 1992: 215; 203–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kozarek, R., Gannon, R., Baerg, R., Wagonfeld, J., Bull, T. Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of ERCP. Arch Intern. Med. 1992: 152: 1040–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walker, A. T., Shapiro, A. W., Brooks, D. C., Braver, J. M., Jumeh, S. S. Bile duct disruption and biloma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: imaging evaluation. A J R, 1992, 158: 785–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cronin, K., Kerin, J. M., Williams, N. N., MacMathuna, P., Crowe, J., Lennon, J., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Gorey, T. F. Endoscopic management of common duct stones with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Irish J. Med. Science 1991: 160; 263–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin, I. G., Holdsworth, P. J., Asker, J. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a routine procedure for gallstones: results of an all-comers policy. Br. J. Surg. 1992: 79; 807–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reddick, E. J., Olsen, D., Spaw, A. et al. Safe performance of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 372–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Voyles, C. R., Petro, A. B., Meenan, A. L., Haick, A. J., Koury, A. M. A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 36–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deziel, D. J., Millikan, K. W., Diran, M. C, Ko, S. T., Doolas, A. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey of 4292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604 patients. Am. J. Surg. 1993: 165; 9–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schirmer, B. D., Edge, S. B., Dix, J., Hyser, M. J., Hanks, J. B., Jones, R. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; treatment of choice for symptomtic gallstones. Ann Surg. 1991: 213; 665–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flowers, J. L., Zucker, Ka., Graham, S. M., Scovill, W. A., Imbembo, A. I., Bailey, R. W. Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg. 1992: 215; 209–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991: 324; 1075.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Graves, H.A., Bakkubger, J.F., Allderson, W. J. Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991: 213; 655–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cuschieri, A., Dubois, F., Mouiel, J. et al. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991, 161: 385–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zucker, K. A., Bailey, R. W., Gadacz, T. R., Imbembo, A. L. Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 36–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berci, G., Sackier, J. M. The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 382–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herschmann, M. J., Rosin, R. D. Laser laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our first 50 patients. Gut 1991: 32; A 1252.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilson, P., Leese, T., Morgan, W. P. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital. Lancet 1991: 338; 795–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McKernan, J. B. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. Surg. 1991; 57: 311–312.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Neugebauer, E., Troidl, H., Spangenberger, W., Dietrich, A., Lefering, R. The cholecystectomy study group. Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 150–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goodman, G. R., Hunter, J. G. Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university teaching hospital. Am. J. Surg. 1991; 162: 576–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Larson, G. M., Vitale, G. C., Casey, J. et al. Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1983 patients. Am. J. Surg. 1992; 163: 221–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soper, N. J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - the new gold standard. Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 917–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Davis, C., Arregani, M., Nagan, R. F. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the St. Vincent experience. Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy 1992: 2: 64–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Graffis, R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Methodist hospital experience. Surgical laparoscopy and endoscopy 1992; 2: 69–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johnston, G. W. Iatrogenic bile duct stricture: an avoidable surgical hazard. Br. J. Surg. 1986: 73; 245–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Collins, P. G., Gorey, T. F. Iatrogenic biliary stricture: Presentation and management. Br. J. Surg. 1984: 71; 980–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blumgart, L. H., Kelley, C. J., Benjamin, I. S. Benign bile duct stricture following cholecystectomy: Critical factors in management. Br. J. Surg. 1984: 71; 836–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pitt, H. A., Miyamato, T., Parapais, S., Tompkins, R. K., Longmire, W. P. Factors influencing outcome in patient with postoperative biliary strictures. Am. J. Surg. 1982: 144; 14–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hunter, J. G. Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kerin, M. J., Williams, N. N., Cronin, K., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Gorey, T. F. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Irish J. Med. Science 1992: 161; 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Petelin, J. B. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg. Laparosc. Enclose. 1991:1; 33–41.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Quattlebaum, J. K., Flanders, H. D. Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. Surg. Laparoscopy Endoscopy 1991: 1; 26–32.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stoker, M. E., Leveillee, M. D., McCann, J. C, Maini, B. S. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J. Laparoendoscopic. Surg. 1991: 1; 287–93.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    MacIntyre, I. M. C., Wilson, R. G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1993: 80; 552–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thistle, J. L., May, G. R., Bender, C. E. et al. Dissolution of cholesterol gallbladder stones by methyl ter butyl ether administered by percutaneous transhepatic catheter. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989: 320; 633–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Keating, J. P., Schroeder, D. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: our first 200 patients. Ann R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1993: 75: 67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dubois, F., Icard, P., Berthelot, G., Levard, H. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg. 1990; 211: 60–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gadacz, T. R., Talamini, M. A. Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161; 336–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McSherry, C. K. Cholecystectomy - the gold standard. Am. J. Surg. 1989: 158; 174–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gorey, T. F., Drumm, J., Collins, P. Haemobilia associated with a post-operative biliary stricture, HPB Surgery 1989: 1; 228–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Raute, M., Podlech, P., Jaschke, W., Manegold, B. C., Trede, M. Management of bile duct injuries and structures following cholecystectomy. World J. Surg. 1993: 17; 553–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas F. Gorey
    • 1
  • Michael J. Kerin
    • 1
  1. 1.Mater HospitalDublin 7

Personalised recommendations