Sugar Tech

, Volume 6, Issue 1–2, pp 95–98 | Cite as

Determination of invert ratio in juice to study the maturity trend of sugarcane clones and its relationship with other quality characters

  • S. Thangavelu
  • K. Chiranjivi Rao
Short Communication


An attempt was made to study the invert ratio in juice of top and bottom portion of 30 clones at 9, 10, 11 and 12 months. Differences between varieties, between stages and between top and bottom portions, interactions between varieties and stages, between varieties and portions, between stages and portions, interactions between varieties, stages and portions were significant. The mean invert ratio in juice of 4 stages ranged from 1.59 in CoC. 671 to 5.56 in Co 7717 in top portion of the cane and from 0.62 in Co C. 671 to 3.30 in CP 44-101 in bottom portion of the cane. The lowest invert ratio was 0.39 in CoC. 671 at 12 months in bottom portion cane while 12.54 in Co 7717 at 9 months in top cane juice was the highest. Co 775, Co 997, Co 62174, Co 6806, Co 7201, Co 7204, Co 7304, Co 7508, Co 7704, Co 7712, CoJ 64, CoC. 671 and CoA 7601 were classified as early maturing at 10.moths. Remaining 17 varieties were classified as late maturing both in top and bottom portions. Invert ratio in juice had significant positive correlations with reducing sugars, glucose, fructose and negative associations with brix, sucrose, purity, C. C. S%, hand refractrometer brix, F/G ratio, HR brix T/B ratio in top and bottom portion cane juice at 9, 10, 11 and 12 months.


Invert ratio reducing sugars sucrose sugarcane maturity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batta, S.K., Sukhjiwan Kaur. And Mann, A.P.S. (2002). Sucrose accumulation and maturity ehaviour in sugarcane is related to invertase activities under subtropical conditions. Sugarcane International, 2002, January/February, 10-13.Google Scholar
  2. Chirnjivi Rao, K., Thangavelu, S and Lalitha, E. (1974). Invert ratio — a reliable guide for classifying early and late maturing sugarcane.Sci;. and Cult.,40: 260–262.Google Scholar
  3. Irvine, J.E. (1974). Variations in the ratio of dextrose to levulose in sugarcane.Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Tech.,15: 1033–1039.Google Scholar
  4. Lakshimikantham, M. (1983). Technology in sugarcane growing. Second Edition. A.P.A.U. Hyderabad.Google Scholar
  5. Mamet, L.D. and Gatwey, N.W. (1999). A relationship between stalk elongation and earliness of ripening in sugarcane.Expt. Agri.,35: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Parthasarathy, K. and Vijayasarathi, M. (1958). Fructose — glucose relation during vegetative and reproductive stages in sugarcane.Curr. Sci.,27: 257.Google Scholar
  7. Parthasarathy, S.V. (1972). Sugarcane in India. K.C.P. Ltd., Madras — 6.Google Scholar
  8. Rousselet, G.R. (1967). Glucose ratio for maturity testing of sugarcane.Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Tech.,12: 715–721.Google Scholar
  9. Sayad, G., Badawi, A.A. and Mohamed, M.S. (1972). Quality of cane juice. III. Changes between cutting and milling of sugarcane. Tech. Bull. Egyptian sug. And Distillation Co. Sugarcane Dept.,38: 15.Google Scholar
  10. Singh, S. and Venkatramana, S. (1987). Growth characteristics in relation to earliness and lareness in maturity of sugarcane varieties, Sugarcane. 1987, Supplement, 23–26, 32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sugarcane Breeding InstituteCoimbatore — 641 007, Tamil NaduIndia

Personalised recommendations