Advertisement

Sugar Tech

, Volume 6, Issue 1–2, pp 35–40 | Cite as

Regeneration and evaluation of sugarcane somaclonal variants for drought tolerance

  • M. E. Wagih
  • A. Ala
  • Y. Musa
Sugarcane

Abstract

The regeneration of drought tolerant variants from embryogenic callus of sugarcane (Saccharum hybrids) of three varieties (Q77N1232-tolerant, Co6519-moderate and Cadmus-sensitive) on a selective medium containing Polyethylene glycol (PEG) corresponded with the degree of tolerance to drought they possess. The three varieties produced 55%, 7% and 4% respectively, of the number of plants produced in the absence of PEG. A total of eight plants regenerated from the moderate and sensitive varieties were selected and grown in a greenhouse for further testing under water stress. Plants were decapitated and microsets were used to clonally propagate them in soil. Plants were further screened for drought tolerance by measuring parameters including Drought Tolerance Capacity (DTC), chlorophyll content, peroxidase activity, proline content and stomata dimensions were assessed at 93 days-old plants, three days after water withholding. DTC of the tolerant variety (Q77N1232) was high for both the control plants regenerated in the absence of PEG and three selected plants in the presence of PEG. There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in DTC between the parental line and its generants. On the contrary, DTC was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the regenerants of the moderate (Co6519) and sensitive (Cadmus) regenerants as compared to their control. These significant difference may qualify the obtain regenerants as Somaclones, with improved tolerance to drought, especially because the value of DTC of the regenerants were comparable to that of the tolerant variety, Q77N1232. The variants have shown a dramatic increase in proline content as a result of exposure to water stress under PEG, as compared to their respective controls. Differences among all tested plants in chlorophyll content were not significant (p > 0.05). Similarly, the trend in peroxidase activity was similar in all blots within treatment and among varieties. Stomata dimensions including length and width have shown significant reduction in the somaclonal variants as compared to their respective controls and due to exposure to water stress under PEG. No inferior agronomic traits were observed on the obtained somaclonal variants. The improved tolerance to drought found amongst the somaclonal variants would be valuable in enhancing the diversity of varieties with high degree of drought tolerance suitable for different areas in the tropics and subtropics prune to drought.

Keywords

Drought tolerance selection somaclonal variations sugarcane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adkins, S.W., Kananuvatchaidach, R. and Godwin, I.D. (1995). Somaclonal variation in rice: Drought tolerance and other agronomic characters.Australian J. Botany,43: 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins, S.W., Shiraishi, T., McComb, J.A., Ratanopol, S., Kupkanchanacul, T., Armstrong, L.J. and Schultz, A.L. (1990). Somaclonal variation from rice: Submergence tolerance and other agronomic characters.Physiologia Plantarum,80: 647–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoloxidase inBeta vulgaris.Plant Physiol.,24: 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P. and Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Short communication.Plant and Soil,39: 205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capelladcs, M., Fontarnau, R., Carulla, C. and Debergh, P. (1990). Environment influences anatomy of stomata and epidermal cells in tissue-culturedRosa multiflora.J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.,115(1): 141–145.Google Scholar
  6. Dwivedi, S., Kar, M. and Mishra, D. (1988). Rapid test for drought resistance in sugarcane.Sugar Cane, Spring Supplement, 31–32.Google Scholar
  7. Handro, W. (1981). Mutagenesis andin vitro selection. In:Plant Tissue culture, methods and application in agriculture, (ed) Thorpe, T.A., Academic Press, New York, pp 155–180.Google Scholar
  8. Heinz, D.J., Krishnamurthi, M., Nickell, L.G. and Marectzki, A. (1977). Cell, tissue and organ culture in sugarcane improvement. In;Applied and Fundamental Aspects of Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture: Reinert, J. and Bajaj, Y.P.S. (eds), Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  9. Heinz, D.J. and Mee, G.W.P. (1969). Plant differentiation from callus ofSaccharum species.Crop Sci.,9: 346–348.Google Scholar
  10. Karp, A. and Maddock, S.E. (1984). Chromosome variation in wheat plants regenerated from cultured immature embryos.Theoretical and Applied genetics,67: 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krishnamurthi, M. and Tlaskal, J. (1974). Fiji disease resistant Saccharum var. Pindar subclones from tissue cultures.Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Tech.,15: 130–36.Google Scholar
  12. Larkin, P.J. and Scowcroft, W.R. (1981). Somaclonal variation: A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement.Theor. Appl. Genet.,60: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lat, J.B. and Lantin, M.M. (1976). Agronomic performance of sugarcane clones derived from callus culture.Philippine J. Crop Sci.,1: 117–123.Google Scholar
  14. Liu, M.C. (1981). In vitro methods applied to sugarcane improvement. In:Plant Tissue Culture Methods and Application in Agriculture, (Ed.) Thorpe, T.A., Academic Press, New York, pp 299–323.Google Scholar
  15. Liu, M.C. and Chen, W.H. (1974). Histological studies on the origin and process of plantlet differentiation in sugarcane callus mass. In:Proc. 15thISSCT, Durban, South Africa, pp. 118–129.Google Scholar
  16. Liu, M.C. and Chen, W.H. (1978). Tissue and cell culture as aids to sugarcane breeding II. Performance and yield potential of callus derived lines.Euphytica,27: 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mousa, N. (1987). Biochemical genetic studies on yeast. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Egypt.Google Scholar
  18. Wagih, E.E. and Fletcher, J. (1993). Zymoblot, a new microtechnique used to detect enzyme activity in spiroplasmas and bacteria.Canadian J. Microbiology.39: 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wagih, M.E., Kaiulo, J.V., Ala, A. and Musa, Y. (2001). Screening Sugarcane Varieties for Drought Tolerance.Science in New Guinea,26(1,2,3): 38–45.Google Scholar
  20. Wagih, M.E., Ala, A. and Musa, Y. (2003). Biomass Analysis and selection of sugarcane genotypes for drought tolerance.Sugar Tech,5(4): 257–263.Google Scholar
  21. Wagih, M.E. and Adkins, S.W. (1998). Embryogenic callus culture for Fiji disease virus elimination in sugarcane.4thbreeding and germplasm workshop, ISSCT, Mauritius-22 May, 1–15.Google Scholar
  22. Wagih, M.E. and Wagih, E.E. (1997). The Zymoblot technique: Potentials in Ag-biotechnology.Proc. Indonesian Biotechnology Conference, IPB, Jakarta, Indonesia, 12-20 June 1997.Google Scholar
  23. Wagih, M.E. and Wagih, E.E. (1999). Transgenic sugarcane regenerated from protoplasts expressing the GUS reporter gene.African Crop Science J.,4: 21–26.Google Scholar
  24. Yang, R. (1993). The contents of ten nutrients elements in leaves of nine sugarcane genotypes. Sugarcane, November/December, No.6 : 10–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Biotechnology CentreThe University of TechnologyLaeNorth of Australia
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureHasanuddin UniversityMakassarIndonesia

Personalised recommendations