Summary
The clinical reactions and symptomatology following the successful smallpox vaccination of 736 university students are outlined.
No significant association was demonstrated between illness and sex, vaccination technique, or scar area from previous vaccination. A significant association exists between illness, the interval since last vaccination, type of reaction, the first appearance of the reaction, and the size of the lesion produced by vaccination.
The advantages cited for the multiple pressure method, as compared with the scratch method of vaccination are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourke, G. J. and Clarke, N. (1963).Brit. Med. J. ii, 281.
Buchanan, G. and Laidlaw, S. (1942).Brit. Med. J., ii, 394.
Cross, R. M. (1961).Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 25, 7.
Dixon, C. W. (1962a).Smallpox, p. 133, J. & A. Churchill (London).
-(1962b).Ibid., p. 131.
-(1962c).Ibid., p. 143.
-(1962d).Ibid., p. 131.
McClean, D. (1955).Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 13, 437.
Mole, B. H. (1947).Lancet, i, 597.
Parish, H. J. (1944).Brit. Med. J., ii, 781.
Parish, H. J. and Cannon, D. A. (1962a).Antisera, Toxoids, Vaccines and Tuberculins in prophylaxis and treatment, p. 206. Sixth Ed., E. & S. Livingstone Ltd., Edinburgh and London.
Parish, H. J. and Cannon, D. A. (1962b).Ibid., p. 204.
Pearson, H. E. S. and Joseph, J. (1963).Lancet, i, 415.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bourke, G.J., Clarke, N. Some observations on clinical reactions following smallpox vaccination. Ir. J. Med. Sc. 39, 75–84 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942305
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942305