Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 193–198 | Cite as

Ultrastructural evidence for the presence of secretory cells in the pineal parenchyma ofHeteropneustes fossilis

  • S. Srivastava
Articles

Abstract

There is an extensive literature dealing with the study of indoles, especially serotonin and melatonin, but with considerably less emphasis on the cells and cell types involved in the synthetic process. In the present electron microscopical investigation of the pineal end vesicle ofHeteropneustes fossilis, pinealocytes have been revealed in the pineal parenchyma characterized with extensive synthetic apparatus viz., rough endoplasmic reticulum, free ribosomes, lipid droplets, mitochondria and Golgi bodies. Two sub-populations of the pinealocytes are easily distinguishable on the basis of electron opacity and the preponderance of one or other morphological profile: light cells and dark cells. Light cells represent the active phase of secretion while dark cells represent the storage and release phase of secretion. A neuroendocrine role for the pineal body inHeteropneustes fossilis is suggested which may be significant in view of the nocturnal habit of the fish.

Keywords

Pineal pinealocytes secretory activity light cells dark cells 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agha A K and Joy K P 1989 Effect of pinealectomy on the histology of adrenocortical homologue and plasma cortisol level in the Indian catfish,Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch);J. Pin. Res. 6 335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collin J P 1981 New data and vistas on the mechanism of secretion of proteins and indoles in the mammalian pinealocyte and its phylogenetic precursors: the pinealin hypothesis and preliminary comments on membrane traffic; inThe pineal organ;Photobiology-biochronometry endocrinology (eds) A Oksche and P Pevet (Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press) pp 187–210Google Scholar
  3. Collin J P and Meiniel A 1972 L’organe pineal du genre Lacerta (Reptile, Lacertilien): action d’enzymes protoeolytiques sur les grains dense (500–3400 A) des photoreceptoreurs rudimentaires;C. R. Soc. Biol. 166 1Google Scholar
  4. Collin J P and Oksche A 1981 Structural and functional relationships in the nonmammalian pineal gland; inThe pineal gland, Vol. 1,Anatomy and biochemistry (ed.) R J Reiter (Boca Raton: CRC Press) pp 27–67Google Scholar
  5. Fenwick J C 1970 The pineal organ; inFish physiology (eds) W S Hoar and D J Randall (New York: Academic Press) Vol.4, pp 99–108Google Scholar
  6. Hafeez M A 1971 Light microscopic studies on the pineal organ in teleost fishes with special regard to its function;J. Morphol. 134 281–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herwig H J 1976 Comparative ultrastructural investigation of the pineal organ of the blind cave fishAnaptichthyes jordani and its ancestor the eyed river fish,Astyanax mexicanus;Cell Tissue Res. 167 297–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iigo M, Kezuka H, Adia K and Hanyu I 1991 Circadian rhythms of melatonin secretion from superfused goldfish(Carassius auratus) pineal glands in vitro;Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 83 152–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Joy K P and Agha A K 1993 A light microscopic study on pineal organ structure and innervation in the catfish,Heteropneustes fossilis;J. Hirnforsch. 34 545–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Juillard M T and Collin J P 1978 The avian pineal organ: evidence for a proteinaceous component in the secretion granules of the rudimentary photoreceptor cells. An ultracytochemical and pharmacological study in the parakeet;Extr.Biol. Cell 31 51Google Scholar
  11. Matty A J 1985Fish endocrinology (Sydney, London: Croom Helm)Google Scholar
  12. McNulty J A 1984 Functional morphology of the pineal complex in cyclostomes elasmobranchs and bony fishes;Pineal Res. Rev. 2 1–40Google Scholar
  13. Oguri M, Omura Y and Hibiya T 1968 Uptake of14C-labelled 5-hydroxy tryptophan into the pineal organ of the rainbow trout;Bull. Jpn Soc. Sci. Fish 34 687–690Google Scholar
  14. Omura Y 1975 Influence of light and darkness on the ultrastructure of the pineal organ in the blind cave fishAstyanax mexicanus;Cell Tissue Res. 160 99–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Owman C H and Rudeberg C 1970 Light fluoresence and electron microscopic studies on the pineal organ of the pike,Esox lucius L. with special regard to 5-hydroxytryptamine;Z-Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 107 522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sheridan M N and Reiter R J 1968 The fine structure of the hamster pineal gland;Am. J. Anat. 122 357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vivien-Roels B and Meiniel A 1981XI Conference of European Society for Comparative Endocrinology, Jerusalem, 10–14 August 1981Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Srivastava
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations