Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 87–101 | Cite as

A changing pedagogy in E-learning: From acquisition to contribution

  • Wim de Boer
  • Betty Collis
Article

Abstract

IN OUR FACULTY’S INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES, we have changed towards a blend of teaching and learning in which course Web sites are often being used as environments where learners can contribute their own experiences, or those of other persons, in their work environments. These submissions are not only "assignments" in a course or module, but also objects that become part of the learning resources of others. In university learning situations, this is a way to engage students more directly in the learning process as contributors as well as consumers of pre-selected learning materials. We conceptualize this pedagogical shift in terms of a move from an acquisition orientation to a contribution orientation. This change of orientation relates to one of several dimensions that we feel are critical for pedagogical decision making. We include a current example related to pedagogical dimensions and in particular to this contribution-oriented pedagogy.

Keywords

pedagogy Web-supported learning e-learning dimensions assignments Web-based tools and systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourne, J.R., McMaster, E., Rieger, J., & Campbell, J.O. (1997). Paradigms for online learning: A case study in the design and implementation of an asynchronous learning networks (ALN) course.JALN, 1(2). [Online] Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue2/assee.htmGoogle Scholar
  2. Collis, B. (2001, 28 June).Linking organizational knowledge and learning. Invited presentation at ED-MEDIA 2001, Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
  3. Collis, B., De Boer, W.F., & Van der Veen, J.T. (in press). Building on learner contributions: A Web-supported pedagogic strategy.Educational Media International.Google Scholar
  4. Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001).Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  5. Collis, B., & Boer, W.F. de (1999). The TeleTOP Decision Support Tool (DST). In J. van der Akker, N. Nieveen, & TJ. Plomp (Eds.),Design methodology and development research in education and training (235–248). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. De Boer, W.F. (2000).E-Learning models and dimensions. Internal Report of the Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente.Google Scholar
  7. Dunkin, M.J. (1987). Introduction to Section 4: Classroom practices. In M.J. Dunkin (Ed.),The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 313–326). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Harrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (1999).Authentic activity as a model for Web-based learning. [Online] Available: http://www-scam.cowan.edu.au/syte/research/authentic/home.html 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Honey P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Peter Honey Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Khan, B.H. (2001). A framework for Web-based learning. In B.H. Khan (Ed.),Web-based training (pp. 98–102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Mioduser, D., & Nachmias, R. (2001). WWW in Education. In H. Adelsberger, B. Collis, & J. Pawlowski (Eds.),Handbook of information technology for education and training. (in press). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Nicaise, M, & Crane, M. (1999). Knowledge constructing through hypermedia authoring.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reeves, T. (1999).Higher education and the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA, Montreal. [Online] Available: http://it2.coe.uga.edu/higherEd/framerA.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. Sfard, A, (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one.Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
  15. Van der Veen, J., De Boer, W.F., & Collis, B. (2000)Didactics for Web learning environments: Active learning. Report for the SURF-TeleTOP Alpha-Beta Project, DINKEL Institute, University of Twente, Enschede, NL.Google Scholar
  16. Weistra, H. (2000, November). E-Learning, waar zijn we mee bezig? (E-learning, what are we doing?). Keynote at the Best Practices E-Learning Conference, Nijmegen. [Online] Available: http://www.sbo.nl/Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Educational Science and TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations