Skip to main content
Log in

A changing pedagogy in E-learning: From acquisition to contribution

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IN OUR FACULTY’S INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES, we have changed towards a blend of teaching and learning in which course Web sites are often being used as environments where learners can contribute their own experiences, or those of other persons, in their work environments. These submissions are not only "assignments" in a course or module, but also objects that become part of the learning resources of others. In university learning situations, this is a way to engage students more directly in the learning process as contributors as well as consumers of pre-selected learning materials. We conceptualize this pedagogical shift in terms of a move from an acquisition orientation to a contribution orientation. This change of orientation relates to one of several dimensions that we feel are critical for pedagogical decision making. We include a current example related to pedagogical dimensions and in particular to this contribution-oriented pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bourne, J.R., McMaster, E., Rieger, J., & Campbell, J.O. (1997). Paradigms for online learning: A case study in the design and implementation of an asynchronous learning networks (ALN) course.JALN, 1(2). [Online] Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue2/assee.htm

  • Collis, B. (2001, 28 June).Linking organizational knowledge and learning. Invited presentation at ED-MEDIA 2001, Tampere, Finland.

  • Collis, B., De Boer, W.F., & Van der Veen, J.T. (in press). Building on learner contributions: A Web-supported pedagogic strategy.Educational Media International.

  • Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001).Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B., & Boer, W.F. de (1999). The TeleTOP Decision Support Tool (DST). In J. van der Akker, N. Nieveen, & TJ. Plomp (Eds.),Design methodology and development research in education and training (235–248). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, W.F. (2000).E-Learning models and dimensions. Internal Report of the Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente.

  • Dunkin, M.J. (1987). Introduction to Section 4: Classroom practices. In M.J. Dunkin (Ed.),The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 313–326). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (1999).Authentic activity as a model for Web-based learning. [Online] Available: http://www-scam.cowan.edu.au/syte/research/authentic/home.html 2001.

  • Honey P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Peter Honey Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, B.H. (2001). A framework for Web-based learning. In B.H. Khan (Ed.),Web-based training (pp. 98–102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mioduser, D., & Nachmias, R. (2001). WWW in Education. In H. Adelsberger, B. Collis, & J. Pawlowski (Eds.),Handbook of information technology for education and training. (in press). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicaise, M, & Crane, M. (1999). Knowledge constructing through hypermedia authoring.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. (1999).Higher education and the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA, Montreal. [Online] Available: http://it2.coe.uga.edu/higherEd/framerA.html

  • Sfard, A, (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one.Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen, J., De Boer, W.F., & Collis, B. (2000)Didactics for Web learning environments: Active learning. Report for the SURF-TeleTOP Alpha-Beta Project, DINKEL Institute, University of Twente, Enschede, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weistra, H. (2000, November). E-Learning, waar zijn we mee bezig? (E-learning, what are we doing?). Keynote at the Best Practices E-Learning Conference, Nijmegen. [Online] Available: http://www.sbo.nl/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim de Boer.

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Wim de Boer is on the Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente. He is one of the designers and developers of the TeleTOP system and has responsibility for coaching instructors in the pedagogical aspects of course design. Currently, he is working on a Ph.D. For more information, see http://users.edute.utwente.nl/boerwf

Betty Collis is on the Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente. She is the scientific leader on the design and development of the TeleTOP system. Collis is a Professor of Tele-Learning and also Senior Researcher for Applications of Telematics in Education and Training in the multifaculty research institute Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT) at the university. She has extensive experience with pedagogical aspects of technology use.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Boer, W., Collis, B. A changing pedagogy in E-learning: From acquisition to contribution. J. Comput. High. Educ. 13, 87–101 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940967

Keywords

Navigation