Skip to main content
Log in

The biomass alternative

A national insurancy policy to protect the US strategic supply of chemical feedstocks

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prospects for biomass commodity chemicals are currently unfavorable as a result of: generic deficiencies in fermentation processes with respect to generally low (below 5%) product concentrations and slow fermentation rates, and lack of a presently competitive advantage for renewable materials compared with depressed prices for crude oil. However, research can alter the first limitation, and Middle East politics, the second.

In the meantime, the continuation of a national research program on biomass conversion is strongly urged as a strategic insurance policy to protect the American organic chemicals industry against further disruptions in crude oil-based feedstocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conoco, Inc. Wilington, DE, Sept. 1986.

  2. McNabb, James E., Mgr. (1987), Economics & Policy Div., Coordination and Planning Dept, Conoco Inc., Houston, TX, private communication.

  3. Busche, R. M. (1985),Biotech. Prog. 1, 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Keim, C. R. (1980),Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Devt. 19, 482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 1982 Corn Annual, Corn Refiners Association, Washington, DC (1982), p. 15.

  6. Janke, R. A. and Koppel, F. F. (1980), Corn Products International, Argo, IL.

  7. Greek, B. F. (1987), C&E News, p. 9.

  8. Keller, George E., Union Carbide, May, 1987.

  9. Relsch, M. S. (1987), C&E News.

  10. Synthetic Organic Chemicals—United States Production and Sales—1985, USITC Publ. #1892, United States International Trade Commission, Sept. 1986.

  11. Chemical Marketing Reporter, June 25, 1985.

  12. Modern Plastics Encyclopaedia 1985–1986 (1985), McGraw Hill, New York.

  13. Lowenheim, F. A. and Moran, M. K. eds. (1975),Faith, Keyes, & Clark’s Industrial Chemicals, 4th ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Windholz, M., ed. (1983),The Merck Index, 10th ed., Merck & Co., Rahway, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopaedia of Chemical Technology (1982), 3rd ed., Wiley,

  16. Shreve, R. N. and Brink, J. A., Jr. (1977),Chemical Process Industries, 4th ed., McGraw Hill, 665.

  17. Agricultural Statistics-1980 (1981), US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, p. 419.

  18. The Outlook for Timber in the United States (1974), FSR #20, USDA Forest Service, Washintgon, DC.

  19. Wahlgren, H. G. and Ellis, T. H. (1978),TAPPI 61, 37.

  20. US Department of Agriculture, Report LMS-201 (1975).

  21. Busche, R. M.(1983),Ind. Chem. News.

  22. Novak, M., Strehaiano, P., Moreno, M., and Goma, G. (1981),Biotech Bioeng. 23, 201–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maiorella, B., Blanch, H. W., and Wilke, C. R. (1983),Biotech. Bioeng. 25, 103–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rogers, P. L., Lee, K. J., Skotnicki, M. L., and Tribe, D. E. (1982),Adv. Biochem. Engr. 23, 37–84.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peppier, H. J. and Perlman, D. (1979),Microbial Technology and Microbial Processes, Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prescott, S. C. and Dunn, C. G. (1959),Industrial Microbiology, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Allen, Billy (1987), Battelle Memorial Institute, private communication.

  28. Wang, D. I. C, Filipe, V., and Tyo, M. A. (1978),US/ROC Symp. Ferm. Eng. Fund. University of Pennsylvania.

  29. Busche, R. M. (1984).Inst. Gas Technol. Symp. Lake Buena Vista, FL.

  30. Schwarz, R. D. and Keller, F. A., Jr. (1982),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ng, T. K., Hessler, R. R., Steiglitz, B., and Ling, L. B. (1986),8th Symp. Biotechnol. Fuels and Chem. Gatlinberg, TN.

  32. {au{fnClark}, {gnI. T.}} ({dy1958}), {jtInd. Eng. Chem.} {vn50}, {pp1125}.

  33. Larcher, A. W. US Patent 1,963,999, Jan. 26, 1934.

  34. Tanikella, M. J. US Patent 4,404,411, Sept. 13, 1983.

  35. Ben-Amotz, A. and Avron, M. (1980),Algae Biomass Production and Use, Shelef, G. and Soeder, C.J., eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 603–610.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Browning, B. L. (1963),The Chemistry of Wood, Interscience, New York, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wenzl, H. F. J. (1970),The Chemical Technology of Wood, Academic, New York, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Paturau, J. M. (1969),By-Products of the Cane Sugar Industry, Elsevier, New York, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vasllakos, N. P. and Barreiros, M. T. (1984),Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Devt. 23, 755–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Faber, M. D., Huibers, D. T. A., and Rakow, M. S. (1980), Am. Inst. Chem. Engr. Meeting Philadelphia, PA.

  41. Parkhurst, H. J., Huibers, D. T. A., and Jones, M. W. (1980),Amer. Chem. Soc. Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

  42. O’Sullivan, D. A. (1984),C&E News p. 63.

  43. Goldstein, I. S., Holley, D. L., and Deal, E. L. (1978),For. Prod. J. 28, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Arola, R. A. and Miyata, E. S. (1981), USFor. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-200.

  45. Reilly, P. J. (1978), Dept. Chem. Engr., Iowa State University, Iowa City, IA.

  46. Moon, G. D., Jr., Messick, J. R., Easley, C. E., and Katzen, R., D.O.E. Automotive Technology Development Contractor Coordination Meeting, Dearborn, MI, Oct. 24, 1979.

  47. Katzen, R., US Department of Energy Report HCP/J6639-01, Dec. 1978).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Busche, R.M. The biomass alternative. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 20, 655–674 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936515

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936515

Index Entries

Navigation