Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiac markers in the low-risk chest pain patient

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Review Article
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the arrival of point-of-care cardiac marker determination, emergency physicians may be able to arrive at the diagnosis of cardiac ischemia faster than ever before. However, these tests must be used with care, as a lack of understanding about when and how they should be obtained is important both for good patient care and to avoid medicolegal pitfalls. This report reviews risk stratification of patients who present with chest pain, provides an overview of cardiac markers and literature supporting their use, and concludes with a practice guideline for the utilization of cardiac markers in the emergency department.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Center for Health Statistics. Detailed diagnosis and procedures: national hospital discharge survey, 1996. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998: 13. Data from Vital and Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical policy for the initial approach to adults presenting with a chief complaint of chest pain, with no history of trauma. American College of Emergency Physicians.Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25: 274–99.

  3. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1366–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlson BW, Herlitz J, Wiklund O, Richter A, Hjalmarson A. Early prediction of acute myocardial infarction from clinical history, examination and electrocardiogram in the emergency room.Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 171–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1163–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu AH, Apple FS, Gibler WB, Jesse RL, Warshaw MM, Valdes R Jr. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Standards of Laboratory Practice: recommendations for the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery diseases.Clin Chem 1999; 45: 1104–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Welch RD, Zalenski RJ, Frederick PD, et al, for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 and 3 Investigators. Prognostic value of a normal or nonspecific initial electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction.JAMA 2001; 286: 1977–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee TH, Goldman L. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain.N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1187–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making.JAMA 2000; 284: 835–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts R, Kleiman NS. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction necessitates the need for a “new diagnostic mind-set”.Circulation 1994; 89: 872–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. www.biosite.com [Accessed October 15, 2005].

  12. Ng SM, Krishnaswamy P, Morissey R, Clopton P, Fitzgerald R, Maisel AS. Ninety-minute accelerated critical pathway for chest pain evaluation.Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 611–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCord J, Nowak RM, McCullough PA, et al. Ninety-minute exclusion of acute myocardial infarction by use of quantitative point-of-care testing of myoglobin and troponin I.Circulation 2001; 104: 1483–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I.N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1648–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Limkakeng A Jr, Gibler WB, Pollack C, et al. Combination of Goldman risk and initial cardiac troponin I for emergency department chest pain patient risk stratification.Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 696–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McCurren RH, Mikhail MG, Ensign LD, et al. Does time of onset and duration of chest pain reliably exclude the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in chest pain observation patients? [abstract]Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 540.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Balk EM, Ioannidis JP, Salem D, Chew PW, Lau J. Accuracy of biomarkers to diagnose acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37: 478–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagurney JT, Brown DF, Chae C, et al. The sensitivity of cardiac markers stratified by symptom duration.J Emerg Med 2005; 29: 409–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. American College of Emergency Physicians.Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 521–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gibler WB, Cannon CP, Blomkalns AL, et al, for the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group; Society of Chest Pain Centers. Practical implementation of the guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46: 185–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Herren KR, Mackway-Jones K, Richards CR, Seneviratne CJ, France MW, Cotter L. Is it possible to exclude a diagnosis of myocardial damage within six hours of admission to an emergency department? Diagnostic cohort study.BMJ 2001; 323: 372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maisel AS, Templin K, Love M, Clopton P. A prospective study of an algorithm using cardiac troponin I and myoglobin as adjuncts in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and intermediate coronary syndromes in a veteran’s hospital.Clin Cardiol 2000; 23: 915–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. UC Davis Emergency Medicine Chest Pain Evaluation Unit. www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/emergency/emergency/chest/ chest.htm [Accessed September 1, 2005].

  24. Pozner CN, Levine M, Zane R. The cardiovascular effects of cocaine.J Emerg Med 2005; 29: 173–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weber JE, Shofer FS, Larkin GL, Kalaria AS, Hollander JE. Validation of a brief observation period for patients with cocaine-associated chest pain.N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 510–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marsan RJ Jr, Shaver KJ, Sease KL, Shofer FS, Sites FD, Hollander JE. Evaluation of a clinical decision rule for young adult patients with chest pain.Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott G. Weiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiner, S.G., Grossman, S.A. Cardiac markers in the low-risk chest pain patient. Int Emergency Med 1, 223–228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02934744

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02934744

Key words

Navigation