Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison between the efficacy of lectures given by emergency and non-emergency physicians in an international emergency medicine educational intervention

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Original Article
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The Tuscan Emergency Medicine Initiative is an international collaboration designed to create a sustainable emergency medicine training and qualification process in Tuscany, Italy. Part of the program involves training all emergency physicians currently practicing in the region. This qualification process includes didactic lectures, clinical rotations and practical workshops for those with significant emergency department experience. Lectures in the didactic portion were given by both emergency medicine (EM) and non-EM faculty. We hypothesized that faculty who worked clinically in EM would give more effective lectures than non-EM faculty.

Methods

Fifty-one emergency physicians from the hospitals surrounding Florence completed the course, which included 48 one-hour lectures. Twenty lectures were given by practicing emergency physicians and 28 were given by non-EM faculty. Participants completed an evaluation at the end of each session using a 5-point Likert scale describing the pertinence of the lecture to EM, the efficacy and clarity of the presentation, the accuracy of the information and the didactic ability of the lecturer.

Results

A mean of 38.5 evaluations was completed for each lecture. Every factor was significantly higher for lectures given by EM faculty: the pertinence of the lecture to EM (4.46 vs 4.16, p<0.001), the efficacy of the faculty (4.10 vs 3.91, p<0.001), the accuracy of the lecture content (4.16 vs 3.96, p<0.001), and the didactic ability of the instructors (4.02 vs 3.85, p=0.001).

Conclusions

When teaching EM, evaluations of lectures in this training intervention were higher for lectures given by EM faculty than by non-EM faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hockberger RS, Binder LS, Graber MA, et al, on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians Core Content Task Force II. The model of the clinical practice of emergency medicine.Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37: 745–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Petrino R, Bodiwala G, Meulemans A, Plunkett P, Williams D, on behalf of the European Society for Emergency Medicine (EuSEM) et al. EuSEM core curriculum for emergency medicine.Eur J Emerg Med 2002; 9: 308–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS. Emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide. 6th edition. New York NY: McGraw-Hill, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold JL, Holliman CJ. Lessons learned from international emergency medicine development.Emerg Med Clin North Am 2005; 23: 133–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas TL. Developing and implementing emergency medicine programs globally.Emerg Med Clin North Am 2005; 23: 177–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aghababian RV, Levy K, Moyer P, et al. Integration of United States emergency medicine concepts into emergency services in the New Independent States.Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26: 368–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bayleygne TM, Shahar A, Tsadic AW, et al. An international training program to assist with establishing emergency medicine in Ethiopia.Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36: 378–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clem KJ, Thomas TL, Wang YT, Bradley D. United States physician assistance in development of emergency medicine in Hangzhou, China.Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32: 86–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Erickson TB, VanRooyen MJ, Werbiski P, Mycyk M, Levy P. Emergency medicine education intervention in Rwanda.Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28: 648–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu EB, Dey CC, Scheulen JJ, Bledsoe GH, VanRooyen MJ. Development of emergency medicine administration in the People’s Republic of China.J Emerg Med 2005; 28: 231–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doezema D, Sklar DP, Roth PB, Rodolico MP, Key G. Development of emergency services in Costa Rica. A collaborative project in international health.JAMA 1991; 265: 188–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holliman CJ, Kirsch TD, Green GB, Wolfson AB, Tom PA. Guidelines for evaluation of international emergency medicine assistance and development projects.Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30: 811–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keyes C, Rodriguez-Gomez G, Quesada-Rodriguez D, Waller J. The Costa Rican emergency medicine residency: design and implementation of a new specialty training program in Central America.Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34: 790–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pirrallo RG, Wolff M, Simpson DE, Hargarten SW. Analysis of an international emergency medical service train-the-trainer program.Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25: 656–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolff M, Pirrallo RG, Hargarten SW. Strengthening emergency medicine in Poland: a training and partnership model.Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 1187–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott G. Weiner.

Additional information

This study was funded exclusively by internal funds from the Tuscan Emergency Medicine Initiative (funded by the Region of Tuscany, Italy) and the Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Italy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiner, S.G., Ban, K.M., Sanchez, L.D. et al. A comparison between the efficacy of lectures given by emergency and non-emergency physicians in an international emergency medicine educational intervention. Int Emergency Med 1, 67–71 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02934725

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02934725

Key words

Navigation