Skip to main content
Log in

Fermentation of sugars in organe peel hydrolysates to ethanol by recombinantEscherichia coli KO11

  • Session 3 Bioprocessing Research
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conversion of monosaccharides in organe peel hydrolysates to ethanol by recombinantEscherichia coli KO11 has been investigated in pH-controlled batch fermentations at 32 and 37°C. pH values and concentration of peel hydrolysate were varied to determine approximate optimal conditions and limitations of these fermentations. Very high yields of ethanol were achieved by this microorganism at reasonable ethanol concentrations (28–48 g/L). The pH range between 5.8 and 6.2 appears to be optimal. The microorganism can convert all major monosaccharides in organe peel hydrolysates to ethanol and to smaller amounts of acetic and lactic acids. Acetic acid is coproduced in equimolar amounts with ethanol by catabolism of salts of galacturonic acid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agricultural Research Service (1962),Chemistry and Technology of Citrus, Citrus Products and Byproducts. Agriculture Handbook No. 98, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Florida Citrus Processors Association (1993), Statistical Summary 1991–1992 Season. Florida Citrus Processors Association, Winter Haven, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kesterson, J. W. and Braddock, R. J. (1976),By-products and Specialty Products of Florida Citrus. Bulletin #784, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grohmann, K. and Baldwin, E. A. (1992),Biotechnol. Lett. 14, 1169–1174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grohmann, K., Baldwin, E. A., and Buslig, B. S. (1994),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45/46, 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishio, N., Oku, Y., Kawamara, D., and Nagai, S. (1979),Hakko Kogaku Kaishi 57, 354–359.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishio, N. and Nagai, S. (1979),Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 6, 371–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall, M. R., Graumlich, T. R., Braddock, R. J., and Messersmith, M. (1985),J. Food Sci. 50, 1211, 1212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Echeverria, E., Burns, J. K., and Wicker, L. (1988),Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 101, 150–154.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Akao, T., Mizuki, E., Saito, H., Okumura, S. and Murao, S. (1992),Bioresource Technol. 41, 35–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lane, A. G. (1980),J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 30, 345–350.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lane, A. G. (1983),Environ. Technol. Lett. 4, 65–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McNary, R., Wolford, R. W., and Patton, V. D. (1951),Food Technol. 5, 319–323.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizuki, E., Akao, T., and Saruwatari, T. (1990),Biol. Wastes 33, 161–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murdock, D. I. and Allen, W. E. (1960),Food Technol. 14, 441–445.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Subba, M. S., Soumithri, T. C., and Suryanarayana, R. (1967),J. Food Sci. 32, 225–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. von Loesecke, H. W. (1934),Citrus Ind. 15, 8, 9, 20, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barnett, J. A., Payne, R. W., and Yarrow, D. (1990),Yeasts Characteristics and Identification, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ohta, K., Beall, D. S., Mejia, J. P., Shanmugam, K. T., and Ingram, L. O. (1991),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57, 893–900.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Beall, D. S., Ingram, L. O., Ben-Bassat, A., Doran, J. B., Fowler, D. E., Hall, R. G., and Wood, B. E. (1992),Biotechnol. Lett. 14, 857–862.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guimaraes, W. V., Dudey, G. L., and Ingram, L. O. (1992),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40, 41–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barbosa, M. F. S., Beck, M. J., Fein, J. E., Potts, D., and Ingram, L. O. (1992),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 1382–1384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burchhardt, G. and Ingram, L. O. (1992),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 1128–1133.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wood, B. E. and Ingram, L. O. (1992),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2103–2110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grohmann, K., Baldwin, E. A., Buslig, B. S., and Ingram, L. O. (1994),Biotechnol. Lett. 16, 281–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pecina, R., Bonn, G., Burtscher, E., and Bobleter, O. (1984),J. Chromatogr. 287, 245–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawford, H. G. and Rousseau, J. D. (1993),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 39/40, 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ingram, L. O., Alterthum, F., Ohta, K., and Beall, D. S. (1990),Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 31, 21–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Beall, D. S., Ohta, K., and Ingram, L. O. (1991),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38, 296–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mckenzie, H. A. (1969), inData for Biochemical Research, 2nd ed., Dawson, R. M. C., Elliott, D. C., Elliott, W. H., and Jones, K. M., eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 481–490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

South Atlantic Area, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Mention of a trademark or proprietary product is for identification only, and does not imply a guarantee or warranty of the product by the US Department of Agriculture. All programs and services of the US Department of Agriculture are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grohmann, K., Cameron, R.G. & Buslig, B.S. Fermentation of sugars in organe peel hydrolysates to ethanol by recombinantEscherichia coli KO11. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 51, 423–435 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02933445

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02933445

Index Entries

Navigation