Skip to main content
Log in

The evolutionary maintenance of sexual reproduction: The solutions proposed for a longstanding problem

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolutionary maintenance of mixis is one of the major unsolved problems in modern biology. This paper reviews the phenoraenon of sex, the hypotheses for its maintenance, and recent evidence bearing on the hypotheses. One elegant experiment supports the idea that bacterial transformation, an analogue and possible forerunner of eukaryolic mixis, functions as a repair mechanism. All mechanisms that produce a short-term advantage for sex in eukaryotes and that are supported by experimental results rely on strong genotype by environment interactions for fitness. While many environmental factors are involved, most prominently parasites, disease, and coarse-grained environmental heterogeneity of other sorts, each is effective only insofar as it is involved in a genotype by environment interaction for fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander H. M. 1989 An experimental field study of anther-smut disease ofSilene alba caused byUstilago violacea: genotypic variation and disease resistance.Evolution 43: 835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics J. and Ellstrand N. C. 1984 Experimental studies of the evolutionary significance of sex. I. A test of the frequency-dependent selection hypothesis.Evolution 38: 103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G. 1982The masterpiece of nature (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell G. and Maynard Smith J. 1987 Short-term selection for recombination among mutually antagonistic species.Nature (London) 328: 66–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson B. O. 1985 Biased conversion as the primary function of recombination.Genet. Res. Camb. 47: 77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P. 1987 Pollinators increase the cost of sex by avoiding female flowers.Ecology 68: 444–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury J. W. and Andersson M. B. (eds) 1987Sexual selection: Testing the alternatives (Dahlem Workshop Report) (New York: John Wiley)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremermann H. J. 1980 Sex and polymorphism and strategies of host-pathogen interactions.J. Theor. Biol. 87: 641–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne R. A. 1980 Compedtion experiments between parthenogenetic and sexual strains of the brine shrimp,Artemia salina.Ecology 61: 471–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull J. J. 1983Evolution of sex determining mechanisms (Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull J. J. 1987 Sex-determining mechanisms: an evolutionary perspective. InThe evolution of sex and its consequences (ed.) S. C. Stearns (Basel: Birkhäuser) pp. 93–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Case T. J. and Taper M. L. 1986 On the coexistence and coevolution of asexual and sexual competitors.Evolution 40: 366–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov E. L. 1982The theory of sex allocation (Princeton: University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. E. and Newman C. M. 1989 Host-parasite relations and random zero-sum games: the stabilizing effect of strategy diversification.Am. Nat. 133: 533–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow J. F. and Kimura M. 1965 Evolution in sexual and asexual populations.Am. Nat. 99: 439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar M. A. and Crozier R. H. 1988 Sex with dead cells may be better than no sex at all.Trends Ecol. Evol. 3: 249–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand N. C. and Antonovics J. 1985 Experimental studies of the evolutionary significance of sex. II. A test of the density-dependent selection hypothesis.Evolution 39: 657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R. A. 1930The genetic theory of natural selection (Oxford: Clarendon)

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma D. 1986Evolutionary biology 2nd edn (Sunderland: Sinauer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghisclin M. T. 1974The economy of nature and the evolution of sex (Berkeley: University of California Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W. D. 1980 Sex vs. non-sex vs. parasite.Oikos 35: 282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W. D., Axelrod R. and Tanese R. 1990 Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (in press)

  • Hedrick P. W. and Whittam T. S. 1989 Sex in diploids.Nature (London) 342: 231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra R. H. 1987 The evolution of sexes. InThe evolution of sex and its consequences (ed.) S. C. Stearns (Basel: Birkhäuser) pp. 59–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes D. J. and Hebert P. D. N. 1988 The origin and genetic basis of olbligate parthenogenesis inDaphnia pulex.Evolution 42: 1024–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y and Sasaki A 1987 Evolution of the number of sexes.Evolution 41: 49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J. 1978 A hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations.Evol. Theor. 3: 191–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakar S. D. 1987 Some two-locus models for the evolution of sex determining mechanisms.Theor. Popul. Biol. 32: 188–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayakàr S. D. and Spurway H. 1966 Sex ratios of some mason wasps.Nature (London) 212: 306–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley S. E., Antonovics J. and Schmitt. J. 1988 A test of the short-term advantage of sexuat reproduction.Nature (London) 331: 714–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M. and Jenkins C. D. 1989a Genetic segretation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.Nature (London) 339: 300–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M. and Jenkins C. D. 1989b Sex in diploids.Nature (London) 342: 232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koella J. C 1988 The tangled bank: The maintenance of sexual reproduction through competitive interactions.J. Evol. Biol. 1: 95–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondrashov A. S. 1988 Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction.Nature (London) 336: 435–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski J. and Stearns S. C. 1989 Hypotheses for the production of excess zygotes: Models of bethedging and selective abortion.Evolution 43: 1369–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. 1975 Pest pressure and recombination systems in plants.Am. Nat. 109: 437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis W. M. Jr. 1987 The cost of sex. InThe evolution of sex and its consequences (ed.) S. C. Stearns (Basel: Birkhäuser) pp. 33–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively C. M. 1987 Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism.Nature (London) 328: 519–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margulis L. 1981Symbiosis in cell evolution (San Francisco: Freeman)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. 1971 What use is sex?J. Theor. Biol. 30: 319–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. 1978The evolution of sex (Cambridge: University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod R. E. and Levin B. R. (eds) 1988The evolution of sex (Sunderland: Sinauer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod R. E., Wodjciechowski M. F. and Hoelzer M. A. 1988Genetics 118: 31–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller H. J. 1932 Some genetic aspects of sex.Am. Nat. 66: 118–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker M. A. 1988 Genetic uniformity and disease resistance in a clonal plant.Am. Nat. 132: 538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock G. B. 1989 Suspending disbelief-of Wynne-Edwards and his reception.J. Evol. Biol. 2: 205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossignol J.-L. 1969 Existence of homogeneous categories of mutants exhibiling various conversion patterns in gene 75 ofAscobolus immersus.Genetics 63: 795–805

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossignol J.-L., Paquette N. and Nicolas A. 1978 Aberrant 4:4 asci, disparity in the direction of conversion, and frequencies of conversion inAscobolus immersus.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 43: 1343–1352

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns S. C. (ed.) 1987The evolution of sex and its consequences (Basel: Birkhäuser)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann A. 1913Vorträge über Deszendenztheorie (Jena: Gustav Fischer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G. C. 1966Adaptation and natural selection (Princeton: University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliiams G. C. 1975Sex and evolution (Princeton: University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williaras G. C. and Mitton J. B. 1973 Why reproduce sexuaily?J. Theor. Biol. 39: 545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D. S. 1983 The group selection controversy: history and current status.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 159–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards V. C. 1962Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior (London: Oliver and Boyd)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stearns, S.C. The evolutionary maintenance of sexual reproduction: The solutions proposed for a longstanding problem. J. Genet. 69, 1–10 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931662

Keywords

Navigation