Skip to main content
Log in

Representations on pre-columbian spindle whorls of the floral and fruit structure of economic plants

Representaciones precolombinas de los husos o malacates de la estructura de la flor y el fruto de las plantas economicas

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A few of the numerous small clay discs from Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica and South America contain accurate illustrations of the reproductive structures of important economic plants. The arrangement of seeds in fruit sections, axial or parietal, is shown for the Solanaceae (tomato, pepper) and the Cucurbitaceae (squash). The number of locules in Gossypium (cotton) bolls and the external appearance of the boll including the precise arrangement of the gossypol glands are illustrated. What are probably floral diagrams of these plant families are represented. The bell-shaped spindle whorls from the Quimbaya culture of Colombia have varied designs that resemble the campanulate flowers o/Brugmansia (Datura, Solanaceae), which is known for its contorted flowers, and hallucinogenic effects. The native mythology and language, recorded in Mexico at the time of the conquest, indicates a pervasive interest in fruit and flower structure, which is reflected in the designs on the spindle whorls. These functional artifacts provide evidence of the accurate plant observation in the less well known cultures of Colombia and Ecuador.

Resumen

Sólo unos pocos de los numerosos y pequeños discos de cerámica precolombina de Mesoamérica y America del Sur, contienen illustraciones correctas de las estructuras de reproducción déplantas económicas importantes. En ellas se muestra la distribución de las semillas dentro de las secciones axial or parietal de la fruta, como en las Solanaceae (tomate y pimiento) y en las Cucurbitaceae (calabacin). También se ilustra el numero de lóculos en la caúpsula de la Gossypium (algodón), al igual que su apariencia externa y la précisa distribution de las glándulas de gossypol. Además se représenta, lo que probablemente sea, un diagrama de laflor de estafamilia déplantas. En la cultura Quimbaya de Colombia, también se encuentran variados disenos de la forma de campana de los husos semejando las flores acampanadas de la Brugmansia (syn. Datura, Solanaceae). Estas flores han sido conocidaspor sus deformaciones, y sus efectos alutinógenos. Tanto la mitologia como la lengua indigena recogidas en México en la época de la conquista, indican un persistente interés en la estructura de laflor y del fruto de estas plantas, lo cual se ve reflejado en los disenos de los malacates. Estos artefactos tan funcionales, dan evidencia de una observation bastante acertada de las plantas economicas en otras culturas menas conotidas, como son las de Colombia y Ecuador.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Qted

  • Anton, F. 1987. Ancient Peruvian textiles. Thames and Hudson, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. C. 1946. The archaeology of Colombia. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bui. 143, Handbook S. American Indians 11:1–147, 828–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, E. H. 1983. The Codex Magliabechiano. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretting, P. K. 1990. New perspectives on the origin and evolution of New World domesticated plants. Econ. Bot. 44:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotherston, G. 1979. Image of the New World. Thames and Hudson, Inc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukasov, S. M. 1930. The cultivated plants of Mexico, Guatemala and Colombia. Bui. Appl. Bot. Genetics and PI. Breeding, Suppl. 47:180–549, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook de Leonard, C. 1971. Minor arts in the classic period in central Mexico. Ch. 7in G. F. Ekholm and I. Bernai, eds., Archaeology of Northern Mesoamerica, Vol. 11, Part 1, Handbook of Middle American Indians. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordry, D., and D. Cordry. 1968. Mexican Indian costumes. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordy-Collins, A. 1979. Cotton and the Staff God: analysis of an ancient Chavin textile. Pages 51–60in A. P. Rowe and A. L. Schaffer, eds., The Junius B. Bird Pre-Columbian Textile Conference. The Textile Museum and Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Harcourt, R. 1962. Textiles of ancient Peru and their techniques. Univ. Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, C. E., and A. J. O. Anderson. 1963. Florentine Codex. Book 11, No. 14, Part 12. Univ. Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, M. E. 1979. Ceramic depictions of maize: a basis for classification of prehistoric races. Amer. Antiquity 44:757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easby, E. K., and J. F. Scott. 1970. Before Cortes, sculpture of Middle America. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York Graphic Soc.

  • Emmart, E. 1940. The Badianus manuscript, an Aztec herbal of 1552. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enciso, J. 1971. Designs from Pre-Columbian Mexico. Dover Publ. Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. A., and M. E. Moseley. 1983. The Northern Andes. Ch. 4in J. D. Jennings, ed., Ancient South Americans. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, P. A. 1979. The natural history of the cotton tribe. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funes Sánchez, M. A. 1970. Arte Pre-Columbiano Ecuatoriano: las tusaiolas o torteras del literal. Cuadernos de Hist, y Arqueol. 20:155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B. 1979. The gourd. Univ. of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. Neotropical Solanaceae. Pages 48–52in G. T. Prance and J. A. Kallunki, eds., Ethnobotany in the neotropics. Adv. in Econ. Bot. 1. New York Botanical Garden, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyden, D. 1979. Flores, creencias y el control social. Actes du XLII Congres International des Americanistes 6:85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C. F. 1976. The face of the earth. Garland Publ. Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larco Hoyle, R. 1938. Los Mochicas. Vol. 1, Casa Editora “La Crónica” y “Variedades” S. A. Ltda., Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. Las escritura Mochica sobre pallares. Revista Geográphica Americana 18:93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943. La escritura Peruana sobre pallares. Revista Geográphica Americana 20:1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1966. Peru. World Publ. Co., Cleveland.

  • Lister, R. H. 1955. The present status of the archaeology of western Mexico: a distributional study. Univ. Colorado Studies Anthropol. Ser. No. 5, Boulder.

  • Lockwood, T. E. 1979. The ethnobotany ofBrugmansia. Jour. Ethnopharmacology 1:147–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., R. S. MacNeish, and G. R. Willey. 1964. Origins of agriculture in Middle America. Ch. 13in A. R. Wauchope and R. West, eds., Vol. 1, Handbook of Middle American Indians. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M. J., S. I. Gnttman, andW. H. Eshbaugh. 1982. Early evolution of chili peppers(Capsicum). Econ. Bot. 36:361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, J. M. 1987. Cotton. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, L. M., and T. W. Whitaker. 1947. Embroideries of the early Maya period and the crop plants depicted on them. Southw. J. Anthropol. 3:294–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. H. 1972. Spindle whorls from the Teotihuacán Valley, Mexico. Paper Mus. Anthropol. 45:45–79, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasztory, E. 1983. Aztec art. Harry Abrams Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. Feathered serpents and flowering trees with glyphs. Pages 137–161in K. Benin, ed., Feathered serpents and flowering trees: reconstructing the murals of Teotihuacán. Fine Arts Museum, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. L. 1976. Cotton. Pages 196–200in N. W. Simmonds, ed., Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickersgill, B. 1984. Migrations of chili peppers,Capsicum sp., in the Americas. Pages 105–123in D. Stone, ed., Pre-Columbian plant migration. Papers of the Peabody Mus. Arch, and Ethnol., vol. 76. Harvard Univ., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rands, R. L. 1953. The water lily in Maya art: a complex of alleged Asiatic origin. U.S. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bui. No. 151. 34:75–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo Tirado, E. R. 1929. Ensayo etnografico y arqueológico de la provincia de los Quimbayas en el nuevo Reino de Granada. Impr. y Libreria de E. de las Heras.

  • Sahagún, Fr. B. de. 1932. A history of ancient Mexico (1547–1577), trans. F. R. Bandelier, C. M. de Bustamante, ed., Fisk Univ. Press, Nashville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. H. 1961. The wild species ofGossypium and their evolutionary history. Oxford Univ. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuttes, R. E. 1979. Solanaceous hallucinogens and their role in the development of New World cultures. Pages 137–160in J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester and A. D. Skelding, eds., The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Séjourné, L. 1956. Burning water. Thames and Hudson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seier, E. 1901. Codex Fejéruáry-Mayer, Berlin.

  • —. 1902–3. Codex Vaticanus No. 3773 (B), An old Mexican manuscript in the Vatican Library, Berlin and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1906. Codex Borgia, Band II, Berlin.

  • —. 1961. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Amerikanischen Sprach-und Altertumskunde. Band 4, Akademische Druck-U. Verlagsanstalt, Graz, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, F. W. 1979. Indian designs from ancient Ecuador. Dover Publ. Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinden, H. J. 1975. A study of Maya art. Dover Publ. Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. D. 1982. Tlazolteotl-ixcuina: the great spinner and weaver.In E. H. Boone, ed., The art and iconography of late post-classic central Mexico. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towle, M. 1961. The ethnobotany of Pre-Columbian Peru. Viking Fund Publ. Anthropol. No. 30, Wenner-Gren Foundation Anthropol. Res., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., and C. H. Miksicek. 1984. Economic plant species associated with prehistoric agriculture in the Maya lowlands. Eeon. Bot. 38:179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacovleff, E., and F. L. Herrera. 1934–5. El mundo vegetal de los antiguos Peruanos. Revista Mus. Nac. 3:241–322; 4:29–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMeekin, D. Representations on pre-columbian spindle whorls of the floral and fruit structure of economic plants. Econ Bot 46, 171–180 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02930633

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02930633

Key Words

Navigation