Skip to main content
Log in

Spelling improvement for college students who are dyslexic

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic problems of the dyslexic child often persist in adult life. Such problems as spelling can interfere with the performance of such adult learners in college. Federal legislation requires reasonable accommodation for these students. At some colleges, this consists of allowing use of tape recorders in lectures and sometimes allowing extra time on examinations. Remediation of reading, writing, and spelling among dyslexic college students is often not addressed. This study reports the use of a modified Orton-Gillingham approach in comparison with a nonphonetic approach and with a group receiving no remediation. The results indicate a significant increase in spelling performance for the group receiving the modified Orton-Gillingham remediation. This contrasts with no significant change in the group receiving nonphonetic remediation and in the control group (no remediation), and indicates that adulthood is not too late for appropriate intervention for the dyslexic student. Colleges offering such intervention and the students receiving it will benefit from improved performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruck, M. 1985. The adult functioning of children with specific language disabilities: A follow-up study.In I. Siegel (ed.).Advances in Applied Developmental Psychology. New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. 1987. The adult outcomes of children with learning disabilities.Annals of Dyslexia 37: 252–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crank, J. N. 1985. Crucial learning and instructional skills for skill-deficient college students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. MF01/PC01.

  • Dalke, C. 1988. Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Test Battery profiles: A comparative study of college freshmen with and without learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 21(9): 567–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, M. L. and Greene, V. E. 1983. An evaluation of the results of standardized testing of elementary Project Read and SLD students based on district-wide tests administered in October, 1983. Bloomington, MN: Bloomington Public Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucci, J., Gottfredson, L., and Childs, B. 1985. A follow-up study of dyslexic boys.Annals of Dyslexia 35:117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, P., Schneiders, C., Paradise, L., and Reiff, H. 1990. Persisting problems of adults with learning disabilities: Self-reported comparisons from their school-age and adult years.Journal of learning Disabilities 23(9): 570–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, A. and Stillman, B. 1960.Remedial Training for Children with Specific Disabilities in Reading, Spelling, and Penmanship. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, B. 1987.Spelling Power. Providence, RI: Jamestown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, B. P. 1985. Higher education for learning disabled college students: They deserve it. Clearinghouse on Higher Education/ERIC.

  • Guyer, B. P. and Sabatino, D. 1989. The effectiveness of a multisensory alphabetic phonetic approach with college students who are learning disabled.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22(7): 430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. and Kauffman, J. 1991.Exceptional Children: Introduction to special education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S. and Wilkinson, G. S. 1984.Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, S. P. (ed.). 1986. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers (6th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. 1988.Learning Disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. and Shankweiler, D. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write.Remedial and Special Education 6: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangrum, C. T. and Strichart, S. S. 1984.College and the Learning Disabled Student. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. and Mercer, A. R. 1987.Teaching Students with Learning Problems (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hearn, C. 1989. Recognizing the learning disabled college writer.College English 51(3): 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardtsen, J. M. 1982. Special education courses for the learning disabled: Alternative techniques for teaching special education and education courses to learning disabled students in the university. Ellensburg, Washington: Central Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, N. 1982. Reading, spelling, handwriting: Traub systematic holistic method.Annals of Dyslexia 32:135–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. 1981.Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. 1988.The Wilson Reading System. Hopedale, MA: Educomp Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. E. 1982. Let me try to make it clearer: Alternative techniques for teaching traditional English grammar to learning disabled students in the university. Ellensburg, Wash.: Central Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guyer, B.P., Banks, S.R. & Guyer, K.E. Spelling improvement for college students who are dyslexic. Annals of Dyslexia 43, 186–193 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928181

Keywords

Navigation