Journal of Genetics

, Volume 72, Issue 2–3, pp 73–83 | Cite as

RFLP approach to breeding for quantitative traits in plants—a critique

  • V. Arunachalam
  • Shanti Chandrashekaran


A number of recent papers suggest that use of RFLPs as markers offers a clear advantage in breeding for improvement in quantitative traits (QTs). The concepts underlying establishment of linkage between RFLP markers and QT loci stem from three papers on tomato published during 1987–1991. Essentially, continuously varying QT phenotypes are assigned to RFLP genotype classes, which can be considered to be determined by a single, diallelic gene with codominant alleles. Linkage is inferred through statistical analysis. Similarly, interaction between markers and QT is also tested by an analysis of variance. Here, the statistical methods employed in these three papers to detect linkage are critically evaluated, especially because subsequent investigations take the concepts developed in these papers as proven. In this paper, we examine the three fundamental papersde novo. We scrutinize the methods employed and the inferences drawn to bring to light what we believe are conceptual drawbacks.


RFLP molecular markers quantitative traits linkage analysis of variance plant breeding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blake T., Lybeck N. and Hayes P. 1991 Good, bad and untested ideas in RFLP and QTL analysis.Plant Breeding Abstr. 61: 1–7Google Scholar
  2. Ellis T. H. N. 1986 Restriction fragment length polymorphism markers in relation to quantitative characters.Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lander E. S. and Botstein D. 1986a Mapping complex genetic traits in humans: New methods using a complex RFLP linkage map.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 11: 49–62Google Scholar
  4. Lander E. S. and Botstein D. 1986b Strategies for studying heterogeneous genetic traits in humans by using a linkage map of RFLPs.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 7353–7357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lander E. S. and Botstein D. 1989 Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.Genetics 121: 185–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mather K. 1951Measurement of linkage in heredity (London: Methuen)Google Scholar
  7. Osborn T. C., Alexander D. C. and Fobes J. F. 1987 Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms linked to genes controlling soluble solids content in tomato fruit.Theor. Appl. Genet. 73: 350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Paterson S., Lincoln S. E. and Tanksley S. D. 1988 Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms.Nature 335: 721–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Paterson A. H., Damon S., Hewitt J. D., Zamir D., Rabinowitch H. D., Lincoln S. E., Lander E. S. and Tanksley S. D. 1991 Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments.Genetics 127: 181–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rick C. M. 1974 High soluble solids content in large fruited tomato lines derived from a wild green fruited species.Hilgardia 42: 493–510Google Scholar
  11. Risch N. 1992 Genetic linkage: Interpreting LOD scores.Science 255: 803–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tanksley S. D. and Hewitt J. 1988 Use of molecular markers in breeding for soluble solids content in tomato-a re-examination.Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 811–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thoday J. M. 1961 Location of polygenes.Nature 191: 368–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zerba K. E., Kessling A. M., Davignon J. and Sing C. F. 1991 Genetic structure and the search for genotype-phenotype relationships: An example from disequilibrium in theApoB gene region.Genetics 129: 525–533PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Arunachalam
    • 1
  • Shanti Chandrashekaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of GeneticsIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations