Advertisement

Intereconomics

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 221–228 | Cite as

Is there a new reforming spirit at international organisations?

The example of UNCTAD IX
  • Berend Diekmann
UNCTAD
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

When the G7 summit in Lyon discussed the reform of multilateral institutions, the spotlight fell unexpectedly on UNCTAD. The final communiqué stated that UNCTAD IX was a milestone on the road towards the renewal of the organisation. The outcome of the conference was also cited as proof of the effectiveness of G7 initiatives to reform international institutions. Finally, the communiqué went so far as to declare that the reform of UNCTAD was a point of reference (in other words, a model) for the reform of the entire economic and social apparatus of the United Nations. What progress did UNCTAD IX really bring? Is it appropriate to regard UNCTAD IX as a yardstick for the reform of other organisations?

Keywords

World Trade Organisation Trade Policy Subsidiary Body Trade Efficiency Technocratic Elite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, No. 59 of 12th July 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See K. Dicke: Effizienz und Effektivität internationaler Organisationen—Darstellung und kritische Analyse eines Topos im Reformprozeß der VN, Berlin 1994, p. 98.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See R. Marxen: UNCTAD, in: R. Wolfrum (ed.): Handbuch der VN, Munich 1991, p. 888.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See K. Dicke, op. cit. Effizienz und Effektivität internationaler Organisationen—Darstellung und kritische Analyse eines Topos im Reformprozeß der VN, Berlin 1994, p. 115.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See Resolution 1995 (XIX): Establishment of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development as an Organ of the General Assembly, in: F. Knipping et al. (eds.): Das System der VN und seine Vorläufer, Vol. I/1, Munich 1995, pp. 634 ff.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    See Auswärtiges Amt: ABC der VN, 2nd ed., Bonn 1995, p. 72.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See R. Marxen, op. cit., UNCTAD, in: R. Wolfrum (ed.): Handbuch der VN, Munich 1991, p. 893.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    See, for example, J. C. Jessen: UNCTAD VIII in Cartagena—ein Neubeginn?, in: Nord-Süd aktuell, No. 1, 1992, pp. 116 ff.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See, for example, Neue Zürcher Zeitung: Deutlicher Handlungsbedarf bei der UNCTAD, 13th/14th January 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    See B. Diekmann: Die Kreditvergabepolitik des IWF, in: Konjunkturpolitik, No. 2, 1994, pp. 158 ff., and Neue Zürcher Zeitung, op. cit. Deutlicher Handlungsbedarf bei der UNCTAD, 13th/14th January 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    See Commission on Global Governance: Our Global Neighbourhood, New York 1995, pp. 153 ff.; and R. von Weizsäcker et al.: The UN in its Second Half-Century: A Report of the Independent Working Group on the Future of the UN, New York 1995, pp. 28 ff.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    See UNCTAD: Midrand Declaration and a Partnership for Growth and Development, Document TD/377, 24. 5. 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Ibid., See UNCTAD: Midrand Declaration and a Partnership for Growth and Development, Document TD/377, 24. 5. 1996 paragraphs 83–85.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Ibid., See UNCTAD: Midrand Declaration and a Partnership for Growth and Development, Document TD/377, 24. 5. 1996 paragraphs 87–99.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    One example was last year’s discussion of unemployment in OECD countries in the 1995 Trade and Development Report. See UNCTAD: Trade and Development Report, New York and Geneva 1995, pp. 119 ff.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    ECOSOC Resolution E 1995/INF/4/Add. 2 of 31.8.1995.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    See K. Dicke, op. cit., Effizienz und Effektivität internationaler Organisationen—Darstellung und kritische Analyse eines Topos im Reformprozeß der VN, Berlin 1994, p. 207.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    See B. Engels: Globale “Trade Efficiency” und einzelwirtschaftliches Marketing in den Nord-Süd-Beziehungen, in: Nord-Südaktuell, No. 4, 1994, pp. 652 ff.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    See K. Dicke, op. cit., Effizienz und Effektivität internationaler Organisationen—Darstellung und kritische Analyse eines Topos im Reformprozeß der VN, Berlin 1994, p. 102.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    See the remarks of the Secretary-General of UNCTAD in: Entwicklungspolitische Informationen, No. 6, 1996, p. 6.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    See the significant language used in UNIDO: Press Release IDO/1619 of 8.5.1996.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    See UNCTAD, op. cit., See the remarks of the Secretary-General of UNCTAD, paragraph 109.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    See A. Plaga: Verwaltung und Haushalt, in: Vereinigte Nationen, 1/1996, p. 31.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    See Entwicklungspolitische Informationen, op. cit., No. 6, 1996, p. 6.Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    See R. Richter et al.: Neue Institutionenökonomik, in: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, No. 3, 1995, p. 132.Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    See D. North: Transaction Costs, Institutions and Economic History, in: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, No. 140, 1984, p. 204.Google Scholar
  27. 28.
    See Neue Zürcher Zeitung, op. cit. Deutlicher Handlungsbedarf bei der UNCTAD, 13th/14th January 1996.Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    On the typology of a new technocratic elite from developing countries, see J. Williamson: In Search of a Manual for Technopols, in: J. Williamson (ed.): The Political Economy of Policy Reform, Washington 1994, pp. 15 ff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© HWWA and Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berend Diekmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Ministry of EconomicsBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations