Advertisement

Urologic radiology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 131–138 | Cite as

Role of ultrasound in medical management of patients with renal stone disease

  • Terri J. Vrtiska
  • Robert R. Hattery
  • Bernard F. King
  • J. William Charboneau
  • Lynwood H. Smith
  • Byrn Williamson
  • Duane M. Brakke
Article

Abstract

Eighty-three patients with radiographically opaque renal stones were evaluated prospectively with ultrasound and compared to KUB (kidneys, ureters, bladder) with tomograms (KUB/T) to further define the use of ultrasound in the evaluation of renal calculi. The presence or absence and the size, number, and location of stones were analyzed and correlated for each modality. Ultrasound detected the presence of renal stones in 77 of 83 (93%) patients. However, all of the stones were detected on ultrasound in only 60% of these patients. Thirty percent (80 of 269) of the papillary-calyceal stones seen on KUB/T were missed on US; 66% of the stones missed measured 2 mm or less. Although ultrasound can be used for detection of intrarenal stones, KUB/T is a more accurate imaging examination for determination of size and number of small stones.

Key words

Kidney, calculi Ultrasound (US) comparative studies Tomography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith LH: Medical evaluation of urolithiasis. Etiologic aspects and diagnostic evaluation.Urol Clin N Am 1:241, 1974Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaude JV, Williams JL, Wright PG, Bush O, Derau C, Neuman RC: Sonographic evaluation of the kidney following extracorporeal shock wave therapy.J Ultrasound Med 6:299–306, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Middleton WD, Dodds WJ, Lawson TL, Foley WD: Renal calculi: Sensitivity for detection with US.Radiology 167:239–244, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pollack HM, Arger PH, Goldberg BB, Mulholland SG: Ultrasound detection of nonopaque renal calculi.Radiology 127:233–237, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brennan RE, Curtis JA, Kurtz AB, Dalton JR: Use of tomography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of nonopaque renal calculi.JAMA 244:594–596, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coughlin BF, Risius B, Streem SB, Lorig RJ, Siegel SW: Abdominal radiograph and renal ultrasound versus excretory urography in the evaluation of asymptomatic patients after ESWL.J Urol 142:1419–1423, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwartz G, Lipschutz S, Becker JA: Detection of renal calculi: Value of tomography.AJR 143:143–145, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lafortune M, Gariepy G, Dumont A, Breton G, Lapointe R: V-shaped artifact in the gallbladder wall.AJR 147:505–508, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scanlan KD: Sonographic artifacts and their origins.AJR 156:1267–1272, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terri J. Vrtiska
    • 1
  • Robert R. Hattery
    • 1
  • Bernard F. King
    • 1
  • J. William Charboneau
    • 1
  • Lynwood H. Smith
    • 2
  • Byrn Williamson
    • 1
  • Duane M. Brakke
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyMayo Clinic and Mayo FoundationRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine/Division of NephrologyMayo Clinic and Mayo FoundationRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations