Skip to main content
Log in

Asymptotic estimators of the sample size in a record model

  • Articles
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The connection between Stirling numbers of the first kind and records is well-known. Applying this relationship, we derive bounds for the maximum likelihood estimator of the sample size based on the number of observed records. The proof proceeds by a remarkable expression of the mode of the unsigned Stirling numbers of the the first kind due to Hammersley. Moreover, this representation of the mode leads to an accurate approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charalambides, C. A. andSingh, J. (1988). A review of the Stirling numbers, their generalizations and statistical applications.Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 17, 2533–2595.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dharmadhikari, S. andJoag-Dev, K. (1988).Unimodality, Convexity, and Applications. Academic Press, Boston.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Erdös, P. (1953). On a conjecture of Hammersley.J. London Math. Soc. 28, 232–236.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, N. (1978). Breaking records and breaking boards.Amer. Math. Monthly 85, 2–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. L., Knuth, D. E. andPatashnik, O. (1994).Concrete Mathematics. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachussetts, 2nd ed.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, J. M. (1951). The sums of products of the natural numbers.Proc. London Math. Soc. 1, 435–452.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E. andPólya, G. (1959).Inequalities. University Press, Cambridge, 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. (1950).Calculus of Finite Differences. Chelsea Publishers, New York, 2nd ed.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, Y. L. (1975).Mathematical Functions and their Approximations. Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Rebollo, J. L., Barranco-Chamorro, I., López-Blásquez F. andGómez-Gómez, T. (1996). On the estimation of the unknown sample size from the number of records.Statist. Probab. Letters 31, 7–12.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, S. B. andDutta, S. K. (1986). Some discrete distributions involving Stirling numbers.Sankhyā Ser. A 48, 301–314.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rényi, A. (1962). Thèorie des èlèment saillants d’une suite d’observations. InColloquium on Combinatorial Methods in Probability Theory, 104–117, Aarhus Universitet, Denmark. Matematisk Institut.

  • Rohatgi, V. K. (1976).An Introduction to Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sibuya, M. (1988). Log-concavity of Stirling numbers and unimodality of Stirling distributions.Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 40, 693–714.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilf, H. S. (1994).Generatingfunctionology. Academic Press, Boston, 2nd ed.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erhard Cramer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cramer, E. Asymptotic estimators of the sample size in a record model. Statistical Papers 41, 159–171 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02926101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02926101

Keywords

Navigation