Abstract
For an adjustment of contingency tables to prescribed marginal frequencies Deming and Stephan (1940) minimize a Chi-square expression. Asymptotically equivalently, Ireland and Kullback (1968) minimize a Leibler-Kullback divergence, where the probabilistical arguments for both methods remain vague.
Here we deduce a probabilistical model based on observed contingency tables. It shows that the two above methods and the maximum likelihood approach in Smith (1947) yield asymptotically the ‘most probable’ adjustment under prescribed marginal frequencies.
The fundamental hypothesis of statistical mechanics relates observations to ‘most probable’ realizations. ‘Most probable’ is going to be used in the sense of so-called large deviations. The proposed adjustment has a significant product form and will be generalized to contingency tables with infinitely many cells.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aebi, R., Nagasawa, M. (1992) Large Deviations and the Propagation of Chaos for Schrödinger Processes. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields94: 53–68
Aebi, R. (1995) A Solution to Schrödinger's Problem of Non-Linear Integral Equations. Z. angew. Math. Phys. (ZAMP)46: 772–792
Beurling, A. (1960) An Automorphism of Product Measures. Ann. Math.72: 189–200
Bickel, P.J., Ritov, Y, Wellner, J.A. (1991) Efficient Estimation of Linear Functionals of a Probability MeasureP with, Known Marginal Distributions. Ann. of Stat.19: 1316–1346
Boltzmann, L. (1896) Vorlesungen über Gastheorie. J.A. Barth Verlag, Leipzig
Carnal, H. (1993) Mathématiques et politique. El. Math.48: 27–32
Csiszar, I. (1975)I-Divergence Geometry of Probability Distributions and Minimization Problems. Ann. Probab.3: 146–158
Csiszar, I. (1984) Sanov Property, GeneralizedI-Projection and a Conditional Limit Theorem. Ann. Probab.12: 768–793
Deming, W.E., Stephan, F.F. (1940) On a Least Squares Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table when the Expected Marginal Totals are Known. Ann. of Math. Stat.11: 427–444
Fienberg, S.E. (1970) An Iterative Procedure for Estimation in Contingency Tables. Ann. Math. Stat.41: 907–917
Föllmer, H. (1988) Random Fields and Diffusion Processes. École d'Été de Saint Flour XV–XVII (1985–87). Lecture Notes Math. 1362, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Fortet, R. (1940) Résolution d'un Système d'Équation de M. Schrödinger. J. Math. Pures et Appl. IX: 83–95
Haberman, S.J. (1984) Adjustment by Minimum Discriminant Information. Ann. of Stat.12: 971–988
Ireland, C.T., Kullback, S. (1968) Contigency Tables with Given Marginals. Biometrika55: 179–188
Lanford, O.E. (1973) Entropy and Equilibrium States in Classical Statistical Mechanics. ‘Statistical Mechanics and Mathematical Problems’ (ed. Lenard A.), Lecture Notes in Phys.20, 1–113, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Nagasawa, M. (1989) Transformations of Diffusion and Schrödinger Processes. Probab. Th. Rel. Fields82: 109–136
Nagasawa, M. (1993) Schrödinger Equations and Diffusion Theory. Monographs in Mathematics vol. 86, Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel
Schrödinger, E. (1931) Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, physikalisch-mathematische Klasse: 144–153
Smith, J.H. (1947) Estimations of Linear Functions of Cell Proportions. Ann. Math. Statist.18: 231–254
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aebi, R. Contingency tables with prescribed marginals. Statistical Papers 38, 219–229 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925224
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925224