Skip to main content
Log in

Growth rate determination of heterogeneous microbial population in swine manure

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of manure concentration on the growth of the heterogeneous microbial population under batch condition was studied. Four manure concentrations were used in the study. The dehydrogenase activity was used as a measure of the active biomass in the manure. The chemical oxygen demand test was used to measure the change in organic material caused by biological activities. The growth curve of the heterogeneous microbial population in swine manure was essentially similar to that of a pure culture grown batchwise in that it had the four principle phases: lag, exponential growth, stationary, and death. The exponential growth phase followed a diauxic growth pattern. High concentration of manure had an inhibitory effect on the microbial growth. Manure diluted less than 1:3 (manure:water) depressed the specific growth rate of the microbial population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghaly, A. E. (1982), Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agricultural Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Loehr, R. C. (1974),Agricultural Waste Management: Problems, Processes and Approaches. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stainer, R. J., Adelberg, E. A., Ingraham, J. L., and Wheelis, M. L. (1979),Introduction to Microbial World. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson, K. and Loehr, R. C. (1974),Crit. Rev. Environ. Cont. 4(2), 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coackley, P. and O'Neill, J. (1975),J. Water Poll. Contr. 74(4), 404–414.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawker, L. E. and Linton, A. H. (1971),Microorganisms' Function, Form and Environment. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewin, G. V., Glendenning, J. R., Helm, A. M., and Rouk, E. (1964),Bioscience 4 (1), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lenhard, G., Ross, W. R., and DuPloor, A. (1964), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Water Pollution Research, Tokyo, Japan.

  9. Bucksteeg, W. (1966), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Water Pollution Research, Munich, Germany.

  10. Ghosh, S. G., Pohland, F. G., and Gates, W. E. (1972),Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 44(3), 376–400.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh, S. G. (1969), Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 230 pp.

  12. APHA (1985), American Public Health Association, New York.

  13. Gaudy, A. E., Gaudy, E. T., and Komolrit, K. (1963),J. Appl. Microb. 5(1), 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhalta, M. N. and Gaudy, A. F. (1965),J. Appl Microb. 12(2), 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porges, N. L., Jasewicz, L., and Hoover, S. K. (1953).J. Appl. Microb. 1(2), 202–208.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stevens, R. J. and Cornforth, I. S. (1974),J. Sci. Food Agric. 25(5), 1249–1261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips, P. A. (1972), Unpublished M.Sc, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghaly, A.E., Kok, R. & Ingrahm, J.M. Growth rate determination of heterogeneous microbial population in swine manure. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 22, 59–78 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922697

Index Entries

Navigation