Advertisement

Biologia Plantarum

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 58–62 | Cite as

Nonrelatedness between symptoms and cucumber virus 4 content in different cucumber cultivars

  • M. Čech
  • Hana Branišová
Article

Abstract

The virus replication capacity (determined by density gradient centrifugation and spectrophotometric virus assay) and severity of symptoms were compared in ten cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars infected by cucumber virus 4. Except the expected resistant susceptible and symptomless virus carrier plants a new paradoxial group of cultivars was found. This group is characterized by low virus reproduction rate but simultaneously associated with severe symptoms and is responsible for difficulties in the virus transmission and purification. It is concluded that the critical evaluation of the resistance against viruses of TMV-group must include symptomatic and quantitative virus assays, as there need not be a direct relationship between virus symptoms and the virus increase.

Keywords

Tobacco Mosaic Virus Virus Content Cucumber Green Mottle Mosaic Virus Virus Assay Cucumber Cultivar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Nesouvislost mezi priznaky a obsahem viru zelenaskvrnité mozaiky okurky (Cucumber virus 4, Knight) v různj'eh kultivarech okurky

Abstract

V deseti kultivarech okurky(Gucumis sativus L.) infikovanych virem zelenoskvrnité mozaiky okurky (CV 4, Knight) se porovnával maximálni obsah viru (stanoveny spektrofotometricky pro centrifugaci v huatotnim gradientu) s intenzitou priznaků. Vedle rezistentnich, náchylnych kultivarů a bezpfiznakych nosioů viru byla nalezena nova paradoxni skupina, vyznacujici se nizkou reprodukci viru a velmi silnymi pfiznaky. V této skupině lze obtizně pfenáSet i cistit virus. Z pokusů vyplyvá, ze ke kritickému posouzeni rezistenoe vůěi virům ze skupiny viru tabákové mozaiky je nutné doplnit sledováni priznaků kvantitativni analyzou obsahu viru, protoze mezi pfiznaky a reprodukci viru v roatlině nemusi byt pfimy vztah.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bancroft, J. B., Pound, G. S.: Effect of air temperature on multiplication of tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco. — Phytopathology44: 481–482, 1954.Google Scholar
  2. Bawdes, F. C.: Plant viruses and virus diseases. — Waltham, Massachusetts, 1950.Google Scholar
  3. Bawden, F. C., Kassanis, B.: The serological relationship between tobacco mosaic virus and cucumber viruses 3 and 4. — Virology34: 174–175, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheo, P. C.: Subliminal infection of cotton by tobacco mosaic virus. — Phytopathology60: 41 to 46, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheo, P. C., Gerard, J. S.: Differences in virus-replicating capacity among plant species inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus. — Phytopathology61: 1010–1012, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawson, J. R. O.: Contrasting effects of resistant and susceptible tomato plants on tomato mosaic virus multiplication. — Ann. appl. Biol.56: 485–491, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harbison, B. D., Finch, J. F., Gibbs, A. J., Hollings, M., Shepherd, R. J., Valenta, V., Wetter, C.: Sixteen groups of plant viruses. — Virology45: 356–363, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kado, C. I., Knight, C. A.: Host specificity of plant viruses I. Cucumber virus 4. — Virology40: 997–1007, 1970.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kooistra, E.: Significance of the non-appearance of visible disease symptoms in cucumber(Gucumis sativus L.) after infection withGucumis virus 2. — Euphytica17: 136–140, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Lebeurier, G., Hirth, L.: Effect of elevated temperatures on the development of two strains of tobacco mosaic virus. — Virology29: 385–395, 1966.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McRitchie, J. J., Alexander, L. J.: Host-specificLycopersicon strains of tobacco mosaic virus. — Phytopathology53: 394–398, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. Mokrá, V., Cech, M., Pozděna, J., Brcák, J.: Tulip necrosis caused by tobacco mosaic virus. — Phytopathol. Z.76: 46–56, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Walter, J. M.: Hereditary resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in tomato. — Phytopathology46: 513–516, 1956.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Experimental Botany 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Čech
    • 1
  • Hana Branišová
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Experimental Botany, Department of Plant PathologyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPraha 6Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations